Guardians of the Galaxy V2 Trailer

[Parasondox]

TOYS!! Poor parents. Their little ones will demand a Baby Groot and Disney has once again controlled the toy market.

GO PLASTIC!!

 

[Phoenixmgs_v1legacy]

The trailer was so good, I've probably watched it like 10 times now. Guardians is easily my most anticipated movie. I can't wait to see/hear all the songs on the soundtrack and I hope Gunn finds a great place to use the Bowie song from the cut scene.

So, basically as trite and cliche as the first one?

Its also the most blatently "Disney-ish" of all the Marvel movies.

The comic books themselves are probably nothing like the movies.

The Guardians of the Galaxy count a raccoon and a walking, "talking" tree among their members. If the comics aren't like the movies, and took that shit seriously, then they must be hot garbage.

Implying you can't take Tree People:


And talking animals:


Seriously

One, a talking raccoon does not equate to a fucking talking lion, especially when he is voiced by Liam Neeson and is that world's version of God.

Two, I think we both know what I meant by serious.
http://cdn.newsapi.com.au/image/v1/567ef66439f22bfd05d850ecc1927a90

1. There is also talking Beavers in the movie, and in the sequals talking Rats/Ferrets.


2. No that is badass/awseome.

This is serious:

There is nothing badass or awesome about Snyderman.

Yes he is:

That fight was awful. Also they should've given Wonder Woman the kryptonite spear, because that's what any intelligent person would do.

Than she would have been stabbed by Doomsday.

Or you know she could have thrown it at Doomsday while Superman distracted him. You know since as someone trained with traditional Ancient Greek arms would surely know how to throw a javelin.

Or Doomsday would have the endurance to remove it before the Kryptonite kills him.

Think about it may only pierce the flesh but could not fully penetrate through and he just rips it off, and worse he crushes the spear.

Honestly all these complaints is because of that fact Superman died, when we all know he's coming back to setup Justice League.

I knew this before the movie even came out, I knew this when Doomsday was first revealed.

I don't get why anyone would defend such a horribly written movie. Nothing makes sense in the whole movie. And, I love Synder's movies including Man of Steel and Sucker Punch. But BvS is something I really can't believe exists.

 

[Samtemdo8_v1legacy]

The trailer was so good, I've probably watched it like 10 times now. Guardians is easily my most anticipated movie. I can't wait to see/hear all the songs on the soundtrack and I hope Gunn finds a great place to use the Bowie song from the cut scene.

So, basically as trite and cliche as the first one?

Its also the most blatently "Disney-ish" of all the Marvel movies.

The comic books themselves are probably nothing like the movies.

The Guardians of the Galaxy count a raccoon and a walking, "talking" tree among their members. If the comics aren't like the movies, and took that shit seriously, then they must be hot garbage.

Implying you can't take Tree People:


And talking animals:


Seriously

One, a talking raccoon does not equate to a fucking talking lion, especially when he is voiced by Liam Neeson and is that world's version of God.

Two, I think we both know what I meant by serious.
http://cdn.newsapi.com.au/image/v1/567ef66439f22bfd05d850ecc1927a90

1. There is also talking Beavers in the movie, and in the sequals talking Rats/Ferrets.


2. No that is badass/awseome.

This is serious:

There is nothing badass or awesome about Snyderman.

Yes he is:

That fight was awful. Also they should've given Wonder Woman the kryptonite spear, because that's what any intelligent person would do.

Than she would have been stabbed by Doomsday.

Or you know she could have thrown it at Doomsday while Superman distracted him. You know since as someone trained with traditional Ancient Greek arms would surely know how to throw a javelin.

Or Doomsday would have the endurance to remove it before the Kryptonite kills him.

Think about it may only pierce the flesh but could not fully penetrate through and he just rips it off, and worse he crushes the spear.

Honestly all these complaints is because of that fact Superman died, when we all know he's coming back to setup Justice League.

I knew this before the movie even came out, I knew this when Doomsday was first revealed.

I don't get why anyone would defend such a horribly written movie. Nothing makes sense in the whole movie. And, I love Synder's movies including Man of Steel and Sucker Punch. But BvS is something I really can't believe exists.

You are just exaggrating the movie's bad qualities. I have seen this movie 3 times, the 3rd being the Dircetor's Cut.

I know the movie has flaws, but goddamn this isn't Spiderman One More Day level of awful. I know how awful a Superhero property can get and BvS comes no where near close. But like I said the reason BvS is what it is is becuase of WB.

1. Because WB really wants to make a movie franchise of DC properties fast.

2. Because Man of Steel underperformed so they got cold feet and wanted Batman, Wonder Woman, Lex Luthor, and Doomsday, and all the characters to set up future movies. Becasue Batman sells. We could have gotten Man of Steel 2 but no put Batman in there.

 

[Gordon_4_v1legacy]

The trailer was so good, I've probably watched it like 10 times now. Guardians is easily my most anticipated movie. I can't wait to see/hear all the songs on the soundtrack and I hope Gunn finds a great place to use the Bowie song from the cut scene.

So, basically as trite and cliche as the first one?

Its also the most blatently "Disney-ish" of all the Marvel movies.

The comic books themselves are probably nothing like the movies.

The Guardians of the Galaxy count a raccoon and a walking, "talking" tree among their members. If the comics aren't like the movies, and took that shit seriously, then they must be hot garbage.

Implying you can't take Tree People:


And talking animals:


Seriously

One, a talking raccoon does not equate to a fucking talking lion, especially when he is voiced by Liam Neeson and is that world's version of God.

Two, I think we both know what I meant by serious.
http://cdn.newsapi.com.au/image/v1/567ef66439f22bfd05d850ecc1927a90

1. There is also talking Beavers in the movie, and in the sequals talking Rats/Ferrets.


2. No that is badass/awseome.

This is serious:

There is nothing badass or awesome about Snyderman.

Yes he is:

That fight was awful. Also they should've given Wonder Woman the kryptonite spear, because that's what any intelligent person would do.

Than she would have been stabbed by Doomsday.

Or you know she could have thrown it at Doomsday while Superman distracted him. You know since as someone trained with traditional Ancient Greek arms would surely know how to throw a javelin.

Or Doomsday would have the endurance to remove it before the Kryptonite kills him.

Think about it may only pierce the flesh but could not fully penetrate through and he just rips it off, and worse he crushes the spear.

Honestly all these complaints is because of that fact Superman died, when we all know he's coming back to setup Justice League.

I knew this before the movie even came out, I knew this when Doomsday was first revealed.

I don't get why anyone would defend such a horribly written movie. Nothing makes sense in the whole movie. And, I love Synder's movies including Man of Steel and Sucker Punch. But BvS is something I really can't believe exists.

You are just exaggrating the movie's bad qualities. I have seen this movie 3 times, the 3rd being the Dircetor's Cut.

I know the movie has flaws, but goddamn this isn't Spiderman One More Day level of awful. I know how awful a Superhero property can get and BvS comes no where near close. But like I said the reason BvS is what it is is becuase of WB.

1. Because WB really wants to make a movie franchise of DC properties fast.

2. Because Man of Steel underperformed so they got cold feet and wanted Batman, Wonder Woman, Lex Luthor, and Doomsday, and all the characters to set up future movies. Becasue Batman sells. We could have gotten Man of Steel 2 but no put Batman in there.

$668million doesn't read like under-performing to me, it seems a very respectable return for the character's first foray into film since the dismal Superman Returns. You should have gotten Man of Steel 2.

 

[hermes]

Did they just give away the big monster and battle in the trailer? Like that's the shit we're not supposed to see! Show us something besides the epic finale!

At least you can give Video Game Trailers this, they never spoil the end.

Either this or Warner Bros trailers.
They couldn't avoid showing the big bad in BvS and Suicide Squad, and they spoiled the "twist" of two Terminator movies in a row (the, arguably, only inspired parts of those movies).

Also, I agree that there is very little badassery in looking at a constipated Supes angst sadly through a shaky lens. I would take a dozens "disney-ish" Guardians movies over a single Snyder version of self serious "dark age" comics every day of the week (or, for what is worth, over the current comic version of Guardians)

 

[Samtemdo8_v1legacy]

The trailer was so good, I've probably watched it like 10 times now. Guardians is easily my most anticipated movie. I can't wait to see/hear all the songs on the soundtrack and I hope Gunn finds a great place to use the Bowie song from the cut scene.

So, basically as trite and cliche as the first one?

Its also the most blatently "Disney-ish" of all the Marvel movies.

The comic books themselves are probably nothing like the movies.

The Guardians of the Galaxy count a raccoon and a walking, "talking" tree among their members. If the comics aren't like the movies, and took that shit seriously, then they must be hot garbage.

Implying you can't take Tree People:


And talking animals:


Seriously

One, a talking raccoon does not equate to a fucking talking lion, especially when he is voiced by Liam Neeson and is that world's version of God.

Two, I think we both know what I meant by serious.
http://cdn.newsapi.com.au/image/v1/567ef66439f22bfd05d850ecc1927a90

1. There is also talking Beavers in the movie, and in the sequals talking Rats/Ferrets.


2. No that is badass/awseome.

This is serious:

There is nothing badass or awesome about Snyderman.

Yes he is:

That fight was awful. Also they should've given Wonder Woman the kryptonite spear, because that's what any intelligent person would do.

Than she would have been stabbed by Doomsday.

Or you know she could have thrown it at Doomsday while Superman distracted him. You know since as someone trained with traditional Ancient Greek arms would surely know how to throw a javelin.

Or Doomsday would have the endurance to remove it before the Kryptonite kills him.

Think about it may only pierce the flesh but could not fully penetrate through and he just rips it off, and worse he crushes the spear.

Honestly all these complaints is because of that fact Superman died, when we all know he's coming back to setup Justice League.

I knew this before the movie even came out, I knew this when Doomsday was first revealed.

I don't get why anyone would defend such a horribly written movie. Nothing makes sense in the whole movie. And, I love Synder's movies including Man of Steel and Sucker Punch. But BvS is something I really can't believe exists.

You are just exaggrating the movie's bad qualities. I have seen this movie 3 times, the 3rd being the Dircetor's Cut.

I know the movie has flaws, but goddamn this isn't Spiderman One More Day level of awful. I know how awful a Superhero property can get and BvS comes no where near close. But like I said the reason BvS is what it is is becuase of WB.

1. Because WB really wants to make a movie franchise of DC properties fast.

2. Because Man of Steel underperformed so they got cold feet and wanted Batman, Wonder Woman, Lex Luthor, and Doomsday, and all the characters to set up future movies. Becasue Batman sells. We could have gotten Man of Steel 2 but no put Batman in there.

$668million doesn't read like under-performing to me, it seems a very respectable return for the character's first foray into film since the dismal Superman Returns. You should have gotten Man of Steel 2.

But WB was aiming for that movie to be a billion dollar box office smash, because again the Box Office standard that they helped established with the Success of The Dark Knight and the Lord of the Rings films.

 

[Samtemdo8_v1legacy]

Did they just give away the big monster and battle in the trailer? Like that's the shit we're not supposed to see! Show us something besides the epic finale!

At least you can give Video Game Trailers this, they never spoil the end.

Either this or Warner Bros trailers.
They couldn't avoid showing the big bad in BvS and Suicide Squad, and they spoiled the "twist" of two Terminator movies in a row (the, arguably, only inspired parts of those movies).

Also, I agree that there is very little badassery in looking at a constipated Supes angst sadly through a shaky lens. I would take a dozens "disney-ish" Guardians movies over a single Snyder version of self serious "dark age" comics every day of the week (or, for what is worth, over the current comic version of Guardians)

Man-childish decadence is what I think of Guardians of the Galaxy.

I rather watch something that is closer to Watchmen than Modern post Renissance, Hanna Montana Disney.

 

[Laughing Man]

You are just exaggrating the movie's bad qualities. I have seen this movie 3 times, the 3rd being the Dircetor's Cut.

Not sure he did exaggerate the movie's bad qualities, he said it was poorly written and it fucking was. The Director's cut didn't make it any less of an utter mess it just spent a little bit longer spreading the mess around.

'Save Martha'

That's all that needs to be said for that movie, Marvel could get away with something like that because THEY get that Superhero movies are a bit dumb and a bit goofy (and GOG puts that fact front and centre) but you can't spend the entire time making your Superhero franchises devoid of levity and fun and super grim and then have scripting as dumb as 'save Martha'.

 

[hermes]

Did they just give away the big monster and battle in the trailer? Like that's the shit we're not supposed to see! Show us something besides the epic finale!

At least you can give Video Game Trailers this, they never spoil the end.

Either this or Warner Bros trailers.
They couldn't avoid showing the big bad in BvS and Suicide Squad, and they spoiled the "twist" of two Terminator movies in a row (the, arguably, only inspired parts of those movies).

Also, I agree that there is very little badassery in looking at a constipated Supes angst sadly through a shaky lens. I would take a dozens "disney-ish" Guardians movies over a single Snyder version of self serious "dark age" comics every day of the week (or, for what is worth, over the current comic version of Guardians)

Man-childish decadence is what I think of Guardians of the Galaxy.

Funny, "man-childish decadence" is what I think every time I hear someone defend Batman v Superman or describe it as "edgy"...

 

[Kenbo Slice]

So, basically as trite and cliche as the first one?

Its also the most blatently "Disney-ish" of all the Marvel movies.

The comic books themselves are probably nothing like the movies.

The Guardians of the Galaxy count a raccoon and a walking, "talking" tree among their members. If the comics aren't like the movies, and took that shit seriously, then they must be hot garbage.

Implying you can't take Tree People:


And talking animals:


Seriously

One, a talking raccoon does not equate to a fucking talking lion, especially when he is voiced by Liam Neeson and is that world's version of God.

Two, I think we both know what I meant by serious.
http://cdn.newsapi.com.au/image/v1/567ef66439f22bfd05d850ecc1927a90

1. There is also talking Beavers in the movie, and in the sequals talking Rats/Ferrets.


2. No that is badass/awseome.

This is serious:

There is nothing badass or awesome about Snyderman.

Yes he is:

That fight was awful. Also they should've given Wonder Woman the kryptonite spear, because that's what any intelligent person would do.

Than she would have been stabbed by Doomsday.

No she wouldn't have. Superman gives her spear, Superman distracts Doomsday, she pokes him with spear and shoves it deep in him, they get away and Doomsday dies. End movie.

The film is a textbook example of poor writing, directing, and editing.

 

[Samtemdo8_v1legacy]

So, basically as trite and cliche as the first one?

Its also the most blatently "Disney-ish" of all the Marvel movies.

The comic books themselves are probably nothing like the movies.

The Guardians of the Galaxy count a raccoon and a walking, "talking" tree among their members. If the comics aren't like the movies, and took that shit seriously, then they must be hot garbage.

Implying you can't take Tree People:


And talking animals:


Seriously

One, a talking raccoon does not equate to a fucking talking lion, especially when he is voiced by Liam Neeson and is that world's version of God.

Two, I think we both know what I meant by serious.
http://cdn.newsapi.com.au/image/v1/567ef66439f22bfd05d850ecc1927a90

1. There is also talking Beavers in the movie, and in the sequals talking Rats/Ferrets.


2. No that is badass/awseome.

This is serious:

There is nothing badass or awesome about Snyderman.

Yes he is:

That fight was awful. Also they should've given Wonder Woman the kryptonite spear, because that's what any intelligent person would do.

Than she would have been stabbed by Doomsday.

No she wouldn't have. Superman gives her spear, Superman distracts Doomsday, she pokes him with spear and shoves it deep in him, they get away and Doomsday dies. End movie.

The film is a textbook example of poor writing, directing, and editing.

Have you forgotten that in the movie Wonder Woman had to hold down Doomsday with her Magic Lasso Rope? Leaving Doomsday binded for Superman to do the Killing Stab?

 

[Samtemdo8_v1legacy]

You are just exaggrating the movie's bad qualities. I have seen this movie 3 times, the 3rd being the Dircetor's Cut.

Not sure he did exaggerate the movie's bad qualities, he said it was poorly written and it fucking was. The Director's cut didn't make it any less of an utter mess it just spent a little bit longer spreading the mess around.

'Save Martha'

That's all that needs to be said for that movie, Marvel could get away with something like that because THEY get that Superhero movies are a bit dumb and a bit goofy (and GOG puts that fact front and centre) but you can't spend the entire time making your Superhero franchises devoid of levity and fun and super grim and then have scripting as dumb as 'save Martha'.

Mabye I am not too offended and bothered at the whole Martha bit because it concerns Batman and lately I have had it with Batman in general.

Its why I do not care for Suicide Squad whether it be good or bad because its in essence a Batman movie and Batman is annoyingly overdone for me.

 

[Phoenixmgs_v1legacy]

You are just exaggrating the movie's bad qualities. I have seen this movie 3 times, the 3rd being the Dircetor's Cut.

I know the movie has flaws, but goddamn this isn't Spiderman One More Day level of awful. I know how awful a Superhero property can get and BvS comes no where near close. But like I said the reason BvS is what it is is becuase of WB.

1. Because WB really wants to make a movie franchise of DC properties fast.

2. Because Man of Steel underperformed so they got cold feet and wanted Batman, Wonder Woman, Lex Luthor, and Doomsday, and all the characters to set up future movies. Becasue Batman sells. We could have gotten Man of Steel 2 but no put Batman in there.

There is not one single plot point that makes sense. Like why does Lois investigate a bullet and not the bombing? Why is Lex even using some very ever so slightly different bullets anyways? Why does Lex bomb the Capitol? Why does Lex need help to bring in a krytonite that I'm sure he can just smuggle in quite easily yet gets super easy access to the Kryptonian ship? Literally nothing makes sense. And, I noticed that right away when watching the movie, it's not like I saw some YouTube video like How it Should've Ended or Honest Trailers and was like "oh yeah, that doesn't make sense, this movie now sucks".

 

[Samtemdo8_v1legacy]

You are just exaggrating the movie's bad qualities. I have seen this movie 3 times, the 3rd being the Dircetor's Cut.

I know the movie has flaws, but goddamn this isn't Spiderman One More Day level of awful. I know how awful a Superhero property can get and BvS comes no where near close. But like I said the reason BvS is what it is is becuase of WB.

1. Because WB really wants to make a movie franchise of DC properties fast.

2. Because Man of Steel underperformed so they got cold feet and wanted Batman, Wonder Woman, Lex Luthor, and Doomsday, and all the characters to set up future movies. Becasue Batman sells. We could have gotten Man of Steel 2 but no put Batman in there.

There is not one single plot point that makes sense. Like why does Lois investigate a bullet and not the bombing? Why is Lex even using some very ever so slightly different bullets anyways? Why does Lex bomb the Capitol? Why does Lex need help to bring in a krytonite that I'm sure he can just smuggle in quite easily yet gets super easy access to the Kryptonian ship? Literally nothing makes sense. And, I noticed that right away when watching the movie, it's not like I saw some YouTube video like How it Should've Ended or Honest Trailers and was like "oh yeah, that doesn't make sense, this movie now sucks".

What is wrong with the idea of her investigating a bullet? Isn't that evidence on its own? You can trace where the bullets came from these days right?

 

[twistedmic]

There is not one single plot point that makes sense. Like why does Lois investigate a bullet and not the bombing?

Because she was at the site of the shooting/massacre and wanted to know who was responsible for it. She was curious about the bullet. She investigated both.

Why is Lex even using some very ever so slightly different bullets anyways?

Because he makes more money when people use his products. Maybe the bullet has better armor-penetration qualities than other bullets. He doesn't want to use a competitors product. He felt like it.

Why does Lex bomb the Capitol?

To fuck with Superman. To kill the Senator that would not give him what he wanted. To try and turn the public against Superman.

Why does Lex need help to bring in a krytonite that I'm sure he can just smuggle in quite easily yet gets super easy access to the Kryptonian ship?

Shipping things into the country legally is far cheaper and easier than smuggling it in. If Kryptonite was legal he could sell his Kryptonite weapons to very rich people/companies. The military guy (can't remember his rank or branch) had less scruples than Senator Finch.

 

[Phoenixmgs_v1legacy]

What is wrong with the idea of her investigating a bullet? Isn't that evidence on its own? You can trace where the bullets came from these days right?

There's nothing fundamentally wrong with investigating the bullet, but that plot point goes literally nowhere and investigating the Capitol bombing could've went somewhere and brought Lex's bad side to public light so there isn't so much freaking hate against Superman and so Supes could get some relief feeling positive at least once in the movie. That whole Africa scene doesn't even need to exist because literally the ONE thing Man of Steel did setup was the fact that very powerful aliens (both bad and good) exist and at least having a conversation about what should happen as it's not nearly that improbable that Superman could switch sides and/or more aliens coming eventually. Not to mention the destruction that occurred to Metropolis and asking the question if Superman should just leave. With what has happened already and what is known, why would you stop Lex bringing in Krytonite when it's very conceivable humans might indeed need it for actual defense purposes and Lex isn't suspected of anything nefarious yet? The movie just follows no logic whatsoever. I was totally psyched to see the movie opening night (being a huge Snyder fan, really liking MoS, and there's fucking Batman too) and I really couldn't believe what I saw.

 

[Phoenixmgs_v1legacy]

Because she was at the site of the shooting/massacre and wanted to know who was responsible for it. She was curious about the bullet. She investigated both.

Why is Lex even using some very ever so slightly different bullets anyways?

Because he makes more money when people use his products. Maybe the bullet has better armor-penetration qualities than other bullets. He doesn't want to use a competitors product. He felt like it.

Why does Lex bomb the Capitol?

To fuck with Superman. To kill the Senator that would not give him what he wanted. To try and turn the public against Superman.

Why does Lex need help to bring in a krytonite that I'm sure he can just smuggle in quite easily yet gets super easy access to the Kryptonian ship?

Shipping things into the country legally is far cheaper and easier than smuggling it in. If Kryptonite was legal he could sell his Kryptonite weapons to very rich people/companies. The military guy (can't remember his rank or branch) had less scruples than Senator Finch.

He blows up the Capitol just to fuck with Superman while leaving himself open to be found out?

There's no reason krytonite should even be illegal and I doubt Lex cares about paying some extra smuggling money to get something in.

I didn't see your reply before posting my above reply, which goes into much better detail as to why nothing makes sense.

 

[twistedmic]

He blows up the Capitol just to fuck with Superman while leaving himself open to be found out?

And to eliminate Senator Finch, who didn't let him do whatever he wanted.

There's no reason krytonite should even be illegal and I doubt Lex cares about paying some extra smuggling money to get something in.

Other than the stated fact that Kryptonite was radioactive, making it similar to shipping uranium or plutonium across country borders.

 

[Gordon_4_v1legacy]

Did they just give away the big monster and battle in the trailer? Like that's the shit we're not supposed to see! Show us something besides the epic finale!

At least you can give Video Game Trailers this, they never spoil the end.

Either this or Warner Bros trailers.
They couldn't avoid showing the big bad in BvS and Suicide Squad, and they spoiled the "twist" of two Terminator movies in a row (the, arguably, only inspired parts of those movies).

Also, I agree that there is very little badassery in looking at a constipated Supes angst sadly through a shaky lens. I would take a dozens "disney-ish" Guardians movies over a single Snyder version of self serious "dark age" comics every day of the week (or, for what is worth, over the current comic version of Guardians)

Man-childish decadence is what I think of Guardians of the Galaxy.

I rather watch something that is closer to Watchmen than Modern post Renissance, Hanna Montana Disney.

You should check out the works of Garth Ennis, even if you don't enjoy them you'd probably find them fascinating.