Vanguard_Ex said:
bigorexia said:
I apologize if this has been mentioned but I do hate these kinds of stories for one big reason.
You say the judge mentioned being disturbed by video games on a youths mental health, well I ask you this:
What about the millions of other people who play violent video games on regular basis and don't snap? Its the same kinda thing people do when for instance a mother has a "premonition" that her child is in danger and it turns out he/she is. That "premonition" only stands out because it was true that one time. She just forgets about every other time she thought something along those lines and it didn't come true.
Somebody get this man a diploma, because I can't recall the last time I saw such a good point.
Welcome to the Escapist, I'll make sure you get a nice room ;D
i agree. mr. vanguard, my friend, makes yet another good point.
it's like slapping a bandaid on the problem, when the cause itself needs to be addressed.
if it hadn't been a gun it could have been a baseball bat, a knife, a shoe, a stick, a fork, etc. you going to ban all that? what people need to realize is that the gun doesn't whisper 'hey kid, shoot your mom, yeaaah.' no, dumbasses, the kid wanted to kill his parents and it just so happens that guns are the easiest method available.
so please, stop being hypocrites. blaming guns is just as dumb as blaming video games.