axlryder said:
Based on your previous statements, you seem to be under the impression that being in a relationship doesn't bring extremely useful and unique experience about relationships and people in general.
Interesting. I never said that. Repeating; "You get experience from everything you do or don't do, except if you're comatose or something."
The "uniqueness and usefulness" part is something you made up and projected.
That is a sentiment that echos a lack of experience with serious relationships or different kinds of partners.
Maybe. There's just one little problem - that's not what I said. Merely what you wish I'd said.
Learning how to balance yourself and accommodate your partner is a considerable and potentially difficult task.
Oh gee, can you teach me what's 2+2 as well? That one's a
toughie.
What's more, your experience runs contrary to the norm, that's what makes it odd.
So? You got some oddness censor built-in in that brain of yours, that refuses to let you see or consider odd things?
Not because it differs from my own. To be blunt, if some guy lasts 30 seconds and doesn't even know the basics of stimulating a girl, then likelyhood is he's probably not going to be all that impressive in the sack. Similarly, if a girl just lies there, well it's sort of like doing a warm corpse. Little awkward.
I don't see the relevance of this to what I said. Again, you're addressing what you wish I'd said, and not what I actually
did say. Which is..."the quality of sex depends on
more than just how good you are at it." See the word? "More"? As in, "in addition to"?
Why the hell are you spinning it as if I said how good you are at it doesn't matter at all? Because I didn't.
You also presume I'm "uncomfortable" with what you say, but I honestly just think it sounds naive and silly, thus my dismissive attitude.
TomAto, TomatOH; stop projecting. You don't like what you're hearing, so you dismiss it, we've all been there and done that. Some of us have moved on from it.
Also, "enough to know a thing or two" could be one relationships for all I know. For one who claims I shouldn't be presumptuous, you yourself seem to be equally so.
See, thing is, I
know how many relationships I've been in. And I
know what I know about them.
You don't. You
chose to assume and then went on to spin a little story to validate your assumption. Reality don't work that way, sorry.