orangeban said:
The interesting argument to consider is when people supposedly chose to be gay. Presumably at puberty, when you start to really feel a sex drive, but that's stupid, the order in which I "became" gay wasn't: I choose to be gay, I start getting boners for dudes, instead it went, I got boners for dudes, I realised I could very well be gay.
You got the early version of that post, so maybe my position wasn't very clear.
I think you're absolutely right, and the people responsible for that particular study were wrong. Sexual orientation is not the same thing as arousal. Normal people experience varying degrees of arousal all the time without it becoming a sexual orientation. As a bisexual, I have a real problem with the idea of determining sexual orientation simply from arousal or even sexual experience.
A sexual orientation, for me and I suspect for you, is a mental and social thing which you arrive at in response to a wide range of things which happen in your life, including experiencing arousal and having sex, but not in any way limited to those things. In my case I'm bisexual, yet for most of my life I've only pursued and had sex with women. I only became bisexual personally and socially when I began to assert a desire for men as a part of my identity, you could argue I was closeted before, but generally speaking neither I or the world had any idea that I was anything but straight. On the other hand, if eventually I settle down in a monogamous relationship with either a man or a woman for the rest of my life, it won't stop me being bisexual.
Plenty of people go most of their lives thinking they're one sexual orientation and then have an experience which turns it around, or which doesn't. I know plenty of people who have had frequent sexual encounters outside of their normal sexual orientation but don't feel it impacts on who they are.
I don't think that's proof that people choose or even that people change, but you have to separate out what is changing and what isn't. There probably is some genetic influence and there may well be some psychological influence on things like arousal or object choice - but those things are
not the same thing as sexual orientation.
Most people generally assume those two things are the same, which is why idiots like this "therapist" can get away with believing that changing people's sexual orientation is changing their arousal states and object choice. It's an amateur mistake which makes me very skeptical about anything this person is saying.