I guess there might be a middle ground. If you invite such things, then fine, but I think what Leon was saying is that simply being here doesn't mean that stylistic critique is the sole purpose of posting. Do staffers and contributors post their articles on this site so that the grammar and style can be analyzed and dissected? I consider people here, as a general rule, who write consistently in the same style to be sort of 'mini-contributors' and if I like their style, even if not grammatically perfect, I will read their stuff.darth jacen said:hi, leon.LeonLethality said:Snipity
I have to disagree slightly with you on your point that the this section isn't for critiquing. I personally relish in the ripping apart of my reviews so that I can fix them and improve. I mainly review old games for the purpose that no one will care and only read the review to critique it. Though if someone is like me and enjoys a good PS2 game or something of the such and read my review just to find out about a game that's great as well! But as a reviewer (used lightly for the moment) I think this site really is as Samurai said a step above the rest for the English side of things. I know many sites that host reviews that are no where near as good as here for critiques and tips. Just a few things for thought I suppose.
So like I said, if you're forthcoming and say "Critique the grammatical correctness and stylistic approach of my posts" then fine; but if not, why, as a part of the general community, would you stylistically and editorially snipe at someone on anything other than the facts and opinions contained within the content? Also, if you feel it necessary to critique style and grammar, why would you do so in a rather curt and borderline insulting manner? It just seems like bad form and psychologically distracting from the "help" you were trying to deliver.