While this is true, the going is slow. 32-bit OSes are still being distributed, as are 32-bit processors. Until 32-bit is deemed legacy, this state of affairs will continue.Dogmeat T Dingo said:Uh, we're making the change to 64bit systems already. Heck, the computer I'm typing on is using a 64bit OS. By 2032, nothing will be still running on 32bit. We'll probably all be enjoying our awesome 4096bit processors and laughing at how primitive those 64bit machines from the good ol days were.KBKarma said:Fun fact: In 2038, on January 19th, at 3:14:07, the Unix Epoch Clock (a 32-bit signed number) will go from 2^31 - 1 to 2^31. Since it's a signed binary number, the Epoch Clock will go from 2147483647 to -2147483648. Since the Epoch Clock measures the amount of seconds since 00:00:00 on January 1st, 1970, the Epoch Clock will now read the time as 13th December, 1901, at 20:45:53. This will wipe out most 32-bit clock representations. 64-bit OSes will overcome this, but most people (and embedded systems) still use 32-bit systems. More info here [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_2038_problem].
However, this won't happen, since it will kill all older machines. Consumers won't stand for that sort of thing, no matter what the reasoning. So, there are high odds that, while we may have 4096-bit processors (if Moore's Law holds and processing power continues to double every 24 months, we may, theoretically, have 524288-bit processors, but I doubt Moore's Law applies in that area), there'll still be some 32-bit machines lodged somewhere out-of-the-way, but, as is common in these situations, vital. Like government offices.