How do you get through to racists who have utterly dejected the term "racist"?

Recommended Videos

Frission

Until I get thrown out.
May 16, 2011
865
0
21
Why is there a sudden resurgence of neo-nazi propaganda?

I hated the video and thought they were the scum of the earth.

Please don't try defending them.
 

Kiyeri

New member
Mar 8, 2010
98
0
0
Gecko clown said:
Using the words "final solution" to describe diversity, classy, very classy.

Its unfortunate that all the people in this video are from the southern states because I've been waiting for an excuse to not think that they're all hicks.
Hey, just because the minority of hicks in the South are extremely vocal about their stupidity, doesn't mean we all are. I live in the South, and I can count the number of them I've met on one hand.

OT: Oh racism, you pop up so often nowadays. I didn't actually watch the video, but I can get the idea of what these ladies said. I would like to ask them why they even bothered to post this video. Did they think they'd start something great? Like a mass-movement to "retake" their rights as white people? Or were they just bored and wanted to stir something up, poke an already sore subject of racism. At least if you're going to put yourself out there, do a good job of it. Don't go spouting off your opinions like facts unless you want to be shouted at for being an idiot/bigot.
 

BloatedGuppy

New member
Feb 3, 2010
9,572
0
0
Why aren't more of you talking about the OP's misuse of the word "dejected" in the thread title?

Seriously guys it's really bugging me. I can't even pay attention to these racists.
 

CaptainMarvelous

New member
May 9, 2012
869
0
0
Always fun in America to hear white folks talking about genocide. I always want a native to roll up and ask
"A what country?"

OT: Teach their kids better is all i can think of
 

Phuctifyno

New member
Jul 6, 2010
418
0
0
I hate to be that guy, but it itches so bad.... Dejected doesn't mean what you think it means. You were thinking rejected. Even ejected might have worked. No blame; easy mistake.

OT: There are some people there is just no getting through to. As you get older, you start to realize that stupid is very real, very common, and isn't going anywhere (any time soon). To remain optimistic, you'll have to put faith in evolution. Videos like this can definitely put that faith in peril. It certainly made me feel... (wait for it) ...dejected.
 

Phuctifyno

New member
Jul 6, 2010
418
0
0
BloatedGuppy said:
Why aren't more of you talking about the OP's misuse of the word "dejected" in the thread title?

Seriously guys it's really bugging me. I can't even pay attention to these racists.
Just a minute too soon. I got your back.
 

Canadamus Prime

Robot in Disguise
Jun 17, 2009
14,334
0
0
Well they do raise some valid points, but "white genocide?" "white countries?" "final solution?" What absurdity is this? What the hell is a "white country?" I don't know of any "white countries." Also I've never heard of anyplace that excludes white people. White people have never been discriminated against so there's no need to actively discourage the behaviour.
 

Legion

Were it so easy
Oct 2, 2008
7,190
0
0
BloatedGuppy said:
Why aren't more of you talking about the OP's misuse of the word "dejected" in the thread title?

Seriously guys it's really bugging me. I can't even pay attention to these racists.
I think my mind automatically read it as rejected. I honestly hadn't noticed.
 

SeanSeanston

New member
Dec 22, 2010
143
0
0
canadamus_prime said:
White people have never been discriminated against so there's no need to actively discourage the behaviour.
But... that's not strictly true.

As an example, people are attacked for being white, it does happen. It's not surprising either, you'd expect it to happen like anything else. There's no point making light of certain people's problems in life just because they were born as part of a certain "group" (as though race or gender or some such is a kind of club where everyone meets together now and then to share collectively in their collective resources) and you feel that group has it well overall or some such. It doesn't balance anything, it doesn't help anything.

And of course, plenty of white people have been discriminated against by other white people, which may be worth mentioning also as an aside.

And when we don't have dissenting voices, voices on both sides of an issue, everything goes to **** because there no checks or balances. It's inevitable. Nothing wrong with questioning things and making sure things stand up to scrutiny and looking at other views.
There's no need for oversimplification either just because it hurts one's brain to have to face the complicated realities.
 

CorvusFerreum

New member
Jun 13, 2011
316
0
0

Okay, first things first: we need to get their terminology right.

Beeing looked at funny, because you say you don't want any more blacks in your country is not genocide.

This is genocide

Second of all: The Nazis didn't want to kill 6 million jews, they wanted to kill all jews. They just got to six million before they were stopped.

Perhaps it is because I'm german, but using words like genocide in such a trivial context just makes me incredibly sad and angry. Maybe those idiots should visit places where such events occured to get some perspective. Sadly there are enough of those throughout the world.
 

lionsprey

New member
Sep 20, 2010
430
0
0
Was that video technically racist?
it did not seem racist to me, xenophobic and just crazy yes but not racist.
if anything the most racist thing in it would be assuming it's only racism if white people do it, such as their example with marrying within ones own "race". the other people wanting to marry within their own race are equally racist.
 

General Vagueness

New member
Feb 24, 2009
677
0
0
Andy of Comix Inc said:
Watching it, I got sad, and then amused, and then sad again, and concerned, and after five minutes of it all I could feel was worried. These people have, in all sincerity, taken up the mantle of believing that anti-racism is actually anti-white. Like, they have convinced THEMSELVES of that. Also note that they've convinced themselves that apparently keeping whites out of black and Asian churches, communities, and countries is a thing. (I'm sure they can go wherever in the world they want to. They just don't want to. What with all the starvation and violent dictatorships 'n all.)

"They tell us, 'Africa is for the Africans! Asia is for the Asians! But white countries are for everyone!'"
What might be meant there is how white people invading somewhere is shown as a bad thing. There might be a point there if it wasn't much more common for white people to be the invaders than the invaded (the only reversals of this that come to mind are the Moorish conquering of Iberian peninsula and the Mongol invasion of eastern Europe).

Andy of Comix Inc said:
So how... how do you talk to people like this? I'm convinced it's a kind of insanity - they have made up (or just poorly interpreted or inferred meaning from) arguments, argue against those arguments, and in doing so completely and utterly cement mistruths in themselves. How do you fight such things? You could ignore it, but others won't.
Yeah, if they're idiots.

Andy of Comix Inc said:
How do you get through to someone who has built up such impeccable defense regarding people changing their minds?
You don't. Their minds are made up. Whether that's "made up" in the sense that they're concluded or in the sense that they're fictional, I'll let you decide.
 

Wargamer

New member
Apr 2, 2008
973
0
0
Guys, here's the problem: they are right.

It is all one way. Consider the following: it is acceptable for black men to make racial slurs against white men, but not the other way around. That is racism; it's racist against whites. It states that blacks have more rights than whites.

The way to solve racism is not to go in ham-fisted and demand that white people "accept" black people, or asians, or whatever little group you fight for. That is what makes white people walk over to the nazi booth and read their pamphlets on ethnic cleansing.

The way you solve it, in fact, is to shut the fuck up. You stop using words like "hate crime", and stop defining people by their skin colour. A black man getting shot by a white guy is not a "hate crime", it's murder. An asian who gets robbed at knife-point is not the victim of a "hate crime", they're victims of a mugging.

Until the 'pro-minority' people learn that, all they're doing is digging a hole that they'll never climb out of.
 

Thaluikhain

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 16, 2010
19,538
4,128
118
SeanSeanston said:
Bhaalspawn said:
Seriously? Men's Rights movement
Oh come on, that's perfectly legitimate when you see how fathers' rights are often treated etc. Let's not pretend this is some kind of zero sum game where if you're in favour of X then you're against Y. If people can have feminist movements and women's rights movements (as opposed to simply "gender equality" which one would think would cover all possibilities) then it seems rather childish to not allow others those same equal rights without glaring at them with suspicion. Kind of seems to undermine one's position as being rather disingenuous when one is so defensive about other people having a voice regarding their own rights, as though it's something so amazingly threatening.
While that is true, there's a big difference between Men's Rights and men's rights. You have any number of people working to support the rights of men, and that is of course a noble endeavor, but the Men's Rights movement is simply a backlash against women having more rights than they used to. Similar to the way groups with things like "Family" "Values" or "Traditional" in their name are usually only interested in spreading homophobia, or countries with "People's" or "Democratic" in the title tend to be accused of human rights abuses and tyranny.

SeanSeanston said:
Andy of Comix Inc said:
When you get to things like Men's Rights, White Rights... you're taking a group that has, by society, been very much "in control" for a long, long time;
But what difference does that make? We don't live in a long, long time: we live right now. It's not justifiable to point to things in the past (i.e. that don't exist) about people who lived in the past (i.e. who don't exist) and use it to make judgements on the present (i.e. things that do exist).

You can't make the world treat people more equally by treating people unequally. That just looks childish and bitter.
Assuming that the group that has been in power all that time has suddenly stopped being in power and all problems caused during that time have been resolved, yes.
 
Sep 24, 2008
2,461
0
0
If there's one thing I took from this, it's the same thing I've taken from every major social or cultural movement since I was born (1980):

People love to be Victims.

It's probably the biggest addiction on the earth. There are documentaries devoted to how difficult it is to be Born rich [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0342143/]. And the people who are rich found this to be galling, apparently [http://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/12/style/biting-the-silver-spoon-that-feeds-him-on-film.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm].

This video is trying to appeal to the side of whites that want to be the victim, with "making sense" in the beginning, as some people say. I'm sure that everyone who lives in a pretty diverse area has felt some form of racism. But as people who live to play the victims, a few of us hold on to those incidents more than others. For every white person who can cite stories about being abused because of their ethnicity, they probably couldn't count the incidents where other people just accepted them or rejected them based on who they are. Same for blacks. Same for Asians.

Also, for people who don't know, South Africa is basically the reverse USA. With the white population being around 29 or so percent. Hell, a quick search in the US Census shows that America's black population is only 13%. More whites make up the population of South Africa than Blacks make up the population if the USA. But yeah, that's a black country.
 

aba1

New member
Mar 18, 2010
3,248
0
0
RhombusHatesYou said:
aba1 said:
Based on this video I am committing genocide to my "race" for having "Asian" kids.
Oh yeah, to most White Supremacists being a 'race traitor' is the worst crime there is, and the worst form of 'race traitor' is a white person who has kids with someone who isn't white.
I never really thought about it before but I guess they would have that opinion... interesting.
 

Loonyyy

New member
Jul 10, 2009
1,292
0
0
You don't? You just educate everyone else, and wait for these sad fuckers to die.

Most of us have heard the jokes about racist grandparents right? It's because they're a product of a different upbringing, and they see no problem with it. People tend to stick with the things they already do. Once they get a community around them, they're very hard to stop. The effort it would take to engage such vile people to knock some sense into them really isn't worth it. I mean, seriously, is anyone here interested in spending a long period of time to rehabilitate these people until they're at the bare minimum of a decent human being?

We ignore stupid people like this, and occassionally laugh at them. Because that's better than crying.
 

teebeeohh

New member
Jun 17, 2009
2,896
0
0
Mexicans are not actually related to the Aztecs.
and isn't every race problem ultimately an economic one? we don't hate foreigners, we hate that they may impact our standard of living.