TheSchaef said:
Well, for starters, my wife would be pissed.
[serious response]
...even though in your examples I may not be personally affected, I recognise that a woman, a child, an innocent bystander is being harmed and through my posession of basic human empathy my morals are offended.
Really? What innocent bystander is harmed by a 19yo drinking alcohol, or by a duuuude smokin' wweeeed, maaaaan? What pedestrian is harmed by a motorist driving 75, and what vegan by my consumption of a delectable veal parmigiana dinner?
[/serious]
I misspoke there a bit. When I said "All of these" I should have said "All of these I personally disagree with". My argument still stands that I can be morally opposed to peadophillia even though I am not a child, but have no qualms with Gay Marriage because it doesn't affect me personally atm due to harm caused and not caused in each case.
but to go through each example:
Well, the 19yo drinking alcohol isn't a good example as I am personally against the drinking age being 21 in America, but being Australian, where it's 18, (and I think it should be 16) my opinion on American drinking laws might not hold much weight. Change your question to being about underage drinking, people are harmed by fostering a drinking culture in early adolescence which causes more instances of alcoholism, drunk driving and alcohol-related violence.
As for the weed thing, again, not a good example as I am pro-legalisation as it is a relatively mild substance that has very few side effects and risks compared with harder substances, and legalisation but regulation will take money out of the hands of criminals. I am against harder drugs because of the increased risk of death or injury to the user or bystanders.
Speeding, again, bad example because there's nothing wrong with speed in controlled circumstances, that's why we can go fast on country roads. It's reckless driving that increases the risk of accident and harm that I take issue with.
The vegan thing is a bit trickier. The question was "If you were a vegan, why would making meat illegal seem wrong to you if it didn't affect you?", not "why should meat be illegal?". I'm not a vegan so I can't speak for them, but if I was I would be against the criminalisation of meat because I recognise that my choice would be my own and not give me license to infringe upon the rights of others.