I am curious...why should God "have to be provable"?

Recommended Videos

vamp rocks

New member
Aug 27, 2008
990
0
0
i think everyone should just live the way that they want to... and stop demanding others for evidence of their god of choice... or trying to convert people to their god of choice...

my motto in life is "do whatever the hell you want... just dont push it on me"
 

vampirekid.13

New member
May 8, 2009
821
0
0
Arsen said:
I am not trying to spark a religious discussion.
Don't say "This will not end well...".

I am just simply requesting reasons as to why people would demand something along a scientific, provable, guidlines for personal self-reliance.

because there are 2 kinds of people, the ones that have "faith" or whatever they call it where they blindly believe anything written in some book, and then there are the ones that believe nothing unless they see it.


now in todays world, where with our technology we can look into space, we can see atoms, and molecules and we know so much why would god not have to be provable?

after all if you dont see it...it generally doesnt exist.
 

Daveman

has tits and is on fire
Jan 8, 2009
4,202
0
0
teutonicman said:
If I say that I can fly, most people would reply "ok, prove it".
yeah this, I don't get why people think you don't need proof (i.e. reverse of the argument presented by the OP).

If you personally don't need proof of something to believe it then what stops you believing that grass is actually purple and the sea is made of lava?

Also if you don't need proof of something for it to be true then our judicial system must seem like mockery to you.
 

L33tsauce_Marty

New member
Jun 26, 2008
1,198
0
0
A quote Constantine: "Yes but you KNOW that god exists." Referring to an argument why he is isn't destined for heaven.
 

DalekJaas

New member
Dec 3, 2008
1,028
0
0
Datalord said:
According to Quincy theory, it is technically impossible to change someone's beliefs, i could get God to come down from heaven and start performing miracles all over the place, and the hardcore atheists wouldn't believe its God,

So the question isn't really, can we prove God exists, or do we need to prove God exists, The question is, does the concept of a God, benefit society.

Personally i believe that the concept of a God, whether or not he exists, benefits society, without the catholic church, we never would have had the Renaissance, because the scientific/artistic movement started when the church (albeit through arguably corrupt means) brought enough wealth to Italy to allow for real scientific research. Also, the concept of a God, has shown to strengthen moral beliefs, (this is in general, don't quote me and complain about the suicide bombers, or the Kool-aid, or the mormon compound in Texas)
God was also responsible for crusades spanning a hundred years in which a large number of innocent people were killed. Witch-hunts, modern and ancient prejudices, the medieval period in which society in Europe stopped. Wars and crimes in modern Ireland. God can't even decide how he wants to be worshipped their are that many versions of Christianity arguing with each other. God is responsible for fakes and phonys tricking ignorant people out their money through the promise of healing or benefits. God is responsible for segregation, fear and terror.

I thought the renaissance was inspired by a revival in learning brought on by the study of ancient Greek and Roman mythology. Ending the god-inspired middle ages.

Anyway I don't care, I was trying to build an arguement, but I will say this, blind faith leads to the worst things in the world. People will kill for their gods, if it was provable that god was no more than a story then the world could be better off.

Besides Christianity has almost had its run, people are getting smarter, soon enough God will be there alongside Zeus in children's mythology books.
 

Duskwaith

New member
Sep 20, 2008
647
0
0
Nmil-ek said:
Duskwaith said:
TheDuckbunny said:
Because there are two 'truths' in this world. Religion and Science. Science is provable, so everyone that believes in science comments about religion not being provable and thus being the lesser truth.

Wow, just came up with that on the spot.
Science isnt always proveable, science and religion are almost a ying-yang type realationship.

Like we know that everything is basicly atoms but we dont know why they are there and if someone created them or put them there.

What science dosnt know is religion. What religion dosnt know is science.
Science progresses and evolves however, new methods of testing are developed, new evidence is brought forward and old evidence is removed. Religion meanwhile always remains static, always says the same things and only adapts when science says no sorry thats absolutley provably wrong. How long did the church try and hold back gravity or the fact that the earth was quite obviously round?

Or that fact that they keep changing their minds yet continuously prattle on about being infalable like the roman church suddenly deciding limbo does not exist you cant change your mind one day and still claim to have all the answers does not work like that.
"Peter you are the rock on which i shall build my church upon. What ever you loose in this kingdom will be loosed in my kingdom, what ever you gain in this kingdom will be gained in my kingdom"

So the Roman Catholic church has the power to declare what exsists and what dosnt in its dogma as decreed my the late JC himself.

Back then that idea was extremly radical and radicalism isnt really wanted in many religions.
 

Deacon Cole

New member
Jan 10, 2009
1,365
0
0
Country
USA
If you enter enough religious discussions, particularly on the existence of god, what you'll find once you wade through the bullshit, is that there is no reason to believe in any god. Most of the reasons people have for believing can often be explained via alternative explanations that do not require any supernatural cause. It's also unfortunate that our brains have evolved with certain instincts and feature that make a spiritual realm seem credible, but this does not stand up to scrutiny.

I have long since stopped seriously asking for evidence because theists have none. All they have are bald assertions and logic fallacies. So now I only ask to attempt to demonstrate that they are believing something they have no reason to believe. This never works since our brains have also evolved to not change its mind so easily, but it's just more straw on the camel's back.
 

esperandote

New member
Feb 25, 2009
3,605
0
0
It isn't supposed to be. Is like you trust your wife that is not going to cheat on you or that she hasnt. You gotta trust.
 

WlknCntrdiction

New member
May 8, 2008
813
0
0
To be honest, there are far more important things going on and to deal with in life than God. All we should want to know is that we are born, we live the life we dictate and then we die. I would like to know whether there is a God or not, but we won't find out in my generation, nor the one after that, etc etc so why worry so much about it? Let the scientist people do their thing, when they finally disprove God then they'll tell us, I'll continue to live my life and tend to more important things.

But actually on topic, I don't believe it until I see it. I akin the Bible to a big book of chinese wisphers. God supposedly came down and gave MAN the ten commandments, the Bible, etc etc. Now you're going to tell me that MAN(that is fallible and corrupt and lying and controlling and forgetful)carried that same message throughout the ages up until now, translated it into several hundred languages and nothing, and I mean NOTHING was changed, moved, added or deleted in any way?

Sorry, but I call bullshit on that one.
 

Akai Shizuku

New member
Jul 24, 2009
3,183
0
0
I don't feel like arguing with people at the moment, although I probably will later...so I'm just going to answer the thread question.

When a rabbit jumps through the snow, it leaves a footprint. Think about that for a moment. Cause and effect. This is elementary logic. Nothing happens without some sort of reason. I have a chart, and it's going to offend people, but I don't care.

[http://tinypic.com]

'Nuff said.
 

Space Spoons

New member
Aug 21, 2008
3,335
0
0
To most of the people who really care about religion, God's existence doesn't have to be provable. That's the definition of faith; you don't always have to see to believe.

It's the people who adamantly persist that God doesn't exist that demand his existence be proven. I'm not usually given to making sweeping generalizations, but it seems that this is usually because adamant and vocal nonbelievers seem to think themselves better and/or smarter than the pious. This believe drives them to try and prove to a vastly religious society that their way, the athiest way, is better, by challenging the faithful to prove what essentially cannot be proven.
 

whaleswiththumbs

New member
Feb 13, 2009
1,462
0
0
comadorcrack said:
God dosn't need to be Provable. Thats why Its called a "Faith".
Faith that something is real, while others show proof that it is not, that would be called ignorance. If you need help putting those together Faith = Ignorance

Well, If a man needs science to be proven in order to beleive it, God should be.

I'm not atheist, infact i don't care which is the truth or not, I just want the truth, the raw un filtered truth.
 

Cliff_m85

New member
Feb 6, 2009
2,581
0
0
eels05 said:
I cant see how God,which ever one were talking about,can be proven.How can something which apparently operates outside of natural laws ever be understood.
Believers should just be content to have faith and ignore the percieved antagonism.
Psychic powers operate outside of natural laws, and we found them to be complete hokum. Psychics don't exist.

Magic operates outside of natural laws, and we found that to be complete nonsense. Magic is done through purely natural laws.

Telekenesis operates outside of natural laws, once again we found it to be bullshit. It doesn't exist.

See where I'm going?
 

Cliff_m85

New member
Feb 6, 2009
2,581
0
0
Akai Shizuku said:
I don't feel like arguing with people at the moment, although I probably will later...so I'm just going to answer the thread question.

When a rabbit jumps through the snow, it leaves a footprint. Think about that for a moment. Cause and effect. This is elementary logic. Nothing happens without some sort of reason. I have a chart, and it's going to offend people, but I don't care.

[http://tinypic.com]

'Nuff said.

False. Where are the thousands of boxes that correspond with the thousands of gods you can worship? Disbelief/belief in Zeus, Allah, Frith, etc.?

If you worship Frith and the Christian God is true, then you go to Hell. Etc.
 

Foolishman1776

New member
Jul 4, 2009
198
0
0
Modern empiricism demands that everything be observable, definable, and repeatable, or it doesn't exist. Modern science is so completely full of itself it has decided it is the only possible answer to absolutely everything. God does not fit into the modern empiricist's view and cannot be observed, defined, or made in a test tube, and therefor cannot exist, they say. Of course, in the end, everyone still has faith in science, as the average person doesn't have access to a particle accelerator, or knowledge of quantum physics, even if they did. In short, most people are actually taking scientists' word for it, in much the same way people of faith take holy books' or religious leaders' word for it. It was actually quite amusing to me, the day I realized that modern science is in many ways a religion.

Cliff_m85 said:
Psychic powers operate outside of natural laws, and we found them to be complete hokum. Psychics don't exist.

Magic operates outside of natural laws, and we found that to be complete nonsense. Magic is done through purely natural laws.

Telekenesis operates outside of natural laws, once again we found it to be bullshit. It doesn't exist.

See where I'm going?
Except that you're wrong, it is logically impossible to disprove anything. All science has proven is that under all circumstances they are able to observe, with all available metrics they have, it doesn't work. Remember, people used to SCIENTIFICALLY believe that the universe orbited the earth. They believed this based on information available at the time, in time it was proven that the earth orbits the sun. So things go, as our knowledge grows, our ability to expand our knowledge grows, to think that we have all the answers, and that we can do the logically impossible is the height of hubris.
 

WlknCntrdiction

New member
May 8, 2008
813
0
0
Space Spoons said:
To most of the people who really care about religion, God's existence doesn't have to be provable. That's the definition of faith; you don't always have to see to believe.

It's the people who adamantly persist that God doesn't exist that demand his existence be proven. I'm not usually given to making sweeping generalizations, but it seems that this is usually because adamant and vocal nonbelievers seem to think themselves better and/or smarter than the pious. This believe drives them to try and prove to a vastly religious society that their way, the athiest way, is better, by challenging the faithful to prove what essentially cannot be proven.
I don't think myself better than it. I don't see why you would live half a life worrying about what will happen to you when you die, you've got a life to live yet, worry about that first, you can worry about death well when you're dead.
People just put it waaaaaay to high up on their list of things to do, worry about surviving, God will worry about you dying, or not, well, if he exists that is:p