No, you're not evil, I mean if THAT'S enough to be considered Evil then the bar's lower then I thought.
I am NOT a donor, am I EDIT: a bad person? EDIT!
- Thread starter headshotcatcher
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Mwa ha ha ha, MWA HA HA HA HA HAAA...AAAAHHH HA HA HA HA HA HAAAAAA!!!headshotcatcher said:
(The above was Evil Laugh #582.)
No, you're not evil. I am.
No, what I'm saying is that if someone wants to DONATE (keyword) their organs then fine. But if someone doesn't then there's no reason we should persecute them for it! Who are we to say how they go about it!?zero_blahs said:so it would block people from going well now that i need this organ im going to sign this card then unsign it?Madara XIII said:voorhees123 said:If you are not a donor then you are not allowed to receive donor organs. Seems fair to me. Why can't that not be a law? Maybe they should make everyone a donor by law, but you have to opt out. If you decide you do not want to donate, then you are screwed if you need a transplant.
What about people who can't donate organs due to their frail state or failing? Should we deny them an organ?
Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeah NO. There's a reason BS like this isn't implemented. Honestly let people decide how to distribute THEIR body parts.
Either way this goes to show that you shouldn't force society on such a decision. I mean don't we have Ownership of our own body? If not then by God this only proves that humans are indeed the most twisted things to ever walk this earth.
Pffft Suuuuuuuuuure and I'm captain Basch fon Ronsenburg of DalmascaFalloutJack said:
I'm the evil one here!! For only I can call upon Azethoth to wreak havoc amongst these disgusting creatures called Humans.....MWAHAHAHAHAHA
*Searches pockets*....Um ya got a Cellphone with at least 2000 lightyears of reception?
I think when you die your body should automatically go to medical research and / or parts should be donated. You don't use your body when you're dead, you're just being selfish by requesting it be kept untouched. Really though, where would you rather have your body? In a place where it will benefit people, or in a ditch?
I love your thinking!NeuroticDogDad said:
I do apologise because I don't think it was clear in my post but I'm not trying to say you're wrong or even necessarily change your mind but to understand you because it's quite obvious that the way we think isn't the same. Don't get excited, angry or frustrated, I'm not misquoting or taking things out of context intentionally and unfortunately I don't have the time or short term memory to either go through all your posts again and again or remember them one time through but I'm trying my best.Celtic_Kerr said:
In the artificial/natural statement and indeed the cast analogy I'm merely trying to provide a context to your statements. It appears you selectively choose what you're comfortable with without a clear trend as to the natural or artificial.
Organ transplants are artificial and you're not comfortable with them but a cast is artificial and you would be ok with it?
Both the dental procedure you underwent and the vicodin are artificial and you were ok with one but not the other?
You also didn't explain why you considered the dam natural and organ transplants unnatural. Both are simply creations of creatures of the earth. "Artifical" simply means made by man, man being part of nature.
In fact, I never understood why artificial and natural are antonyms. Have you got any opinions on why that is?
As a side note, should we continue in this off-topic way or should I create a specific thread for this discussion?
Not a donar, I don't want people carving me up if I'm in a coma, hell I'd prob wake up during the damn surgery. At any rate, I do applaud the people who are brave enough to check yes.
This summarise it pretty much. But then again you do seem to be a morally weak being, avoiding to do something that will not bring you any real harm but expect others to do it if you where in the need for an other doing what you would not.emeraldrafael said:
So I conclude that in you're probably not stereotypical evil, but being morally weak is pretty much as morally evil as you get without spreading suffering, like selling drugs or killing people for kicks.
Oh it does. It bothers me very much, and I want to avoid surgery as much as possible. But if my life is at stake, I'm going to have to get over my phobias. That doesn't meant I would be comfortable with it though. People might think my desire to cling to life is selfish, and it probably is. I just don't like the idea of being cut open and having my guts removed while I am still technically "alive", and will try to avoid it under all circumstances. Even if I am brain dead. I know people might not consider that being alive, but I do. That's the whole reason I'm uncomfortable with the process.NeuroticDogDad said:
Besides, odds are that if you need an organ transplant you're not healthy enough to give one anyways. So the whole question seems kind of moot, unless you are questioning this from a moral standpoint. In which case I would have to wonder why you think it's acceptable to let any person die just because they won't give up their body.
Greetings Captain! No, sorry. I never carry cellphones. And Azathoth isn't even evil. He is, in fact, entirely mindless with Nyarlathotep being the nigh-omnipotent echo of his soul made manifest to serve the Outer Gods. Most evil cultists look upon those who try to summon Azathoth as CRAZY, since the 'thoth will just bump the planet and it'll EXPLODE.Madara XIII said:
just ask yourself why you are not an organ donor and figure if that is a good reason.headshotcatcher said:
I really should get my donor card set up.
They can use my organs, or any other body remains for that matter, in any way they like. Use them as a paper weight or to fix that rocking table.
I don't care. I have no use for them.
And if my organs can improve someone else's life or keep him/her from dying for even a month or so, it would be awesome.
They can use my organs, or any other body remains for that matter, in any way they like. Use them as a paper weight or to fix that rocking table.
I don't care. I have no use for them.
And if my organs can improve someone else's life or keep him/her from dying for even a month or so, it would be awesome.
Your not being persecuted though you wouldnt get the organ because you were selfish with your own so you pass away with your organs all safe inside you.Madara XIII said:No, what I'm saying is that if someone wants to DONATE (keyword) their organs then fine. But if someone doesn't then there's no reason we should persecute them for it! Who are we to say how they go about it!?zero_blahs said:so it would block people from going well now that i need this organ im going to sign this card then unsign it?Madara XIII said:voorhees123 said:If you are not a donor then you are not allowed to receive donor organs. Seems fair to me. Why can't that not be a law? Maybe they should make everyone a donor by law, but you have to opt out. If you decide you do not want to donate, then you are screwed if you need a transplant.
What about people who can't donate organs due to their frail state or failing? Should we deny them an organ?
Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeah NO. There's a reason BS like this isn't implemented. Honestly let people decide how to distribute THEIR body parts.
Either way this goes to show that you shouldn't force society on such a decision. I mean don't we have Ownership of our own body? If not then by God this only proves that humans are indeed the most twisted things to ever walk this earth.
BAD!maturin said:
OP: No. Just scared. But, in all seriousness, people probably need those, so just suck it up and get the little red stamp on the card.