I believe we may just have a gaming travesty on our hands...

Recommended Videos

WraithGadra

New member
Dec 3, 2007
68
0
0
I suppose I shouldn't be surprised that this thread is full of the standard "How DARE other people enjoy MY HOBBY!" whining. I can understand not liking the show, even though I find it entertaining. I can understand not liking the people on the show. I can understand being annoyed at the people responsible for the show. What I don't understand is this "ruining the hobby" nonsense. How exactly does a not very popular TV show affect how you spend your free time in any way? The WCG doesn't have any input on what games get made and bought. Competitive gaming has been put on TV before and the industry has moved on just fine. Get over yourselves.

The other things I don't understand is the posturing (I can walk all over them!) and the "Games aren't meant to be competitive" statements. In the former, you don't have enough information to definitively say that. In the latter, who says? Why do they say that? You can compete in anything if you want to and can find someone else who wants to as well. It's ridiculous to say "You can't enjoy this product that way" when it doesn't affect anyone else.
 

crono738

New member
Sep 4, 2008
550
0
0
irishdelinquent said:
Well, that looks utterly stupid. However, I have a definite solution on how to solve the problem. The whole "draw" of the show is that they play out video games in real life? Well, let's have them play Smart Bomb. They have 30 seconds to disarm a bomb...that can't be disarmed, and is triggered remotely in 5 seconds. Instant ratings, and an apology to every true gamer that this show slaps in the face.
That post was made of win.

And yes...the show fails about as much as Battlefield Earth...
 

ThaBenMan

Mandalorian Buddha
Mar 6, 2008
3,682
0
0
SharPhoe said:
ThaBenMan said:
I think people are misunderstanding one thing - you're all saying they're not "real" gamers. They've won other competitions before this (it lists their achievements at different parts), so apparently they do have the skills. And as for their appearance, well, they're not fat pimply walking stereotypes, but they're not models either. And they probably have to be in fairly good shape to do the real life challenges.

You're all acting like this is a threat to our livelihood as gamers or something. I just think you need to relax, and just ignore it if you don't like it.
Consider that you watched it yourself and can speak from experience, yeah, I can respect that opinion. Sure, venting against the show isn't gonna do anything to stop it, but hey, at least it's a logical, unfeeling outlet to release pent-up frustration on, right?
I guess so. I just don't want to be a pariah for actually kind of liking it O_O

The finale is on tuesday night at 10. I'll probably check it out.
 

scotth266

Wait when did I get a sub
Jan 10, 2009
5,202
0
0
Griever18 said:
Well.....needless to say Sci Fi has lost what little respect I still had for them.
What, Who Wants to be a Superhero didn't do it for ya? Oh well...

But yes, this is stupid, pointless, all of the above... I feel sort of insulted that these people call themselves gamers.
 

ThorUK

New member
Dec 11, 2008
158
0
0
See my reply to video on there. In case it's off the front page, here it is again:

Daft idea, I have something better: find the best FPS players out there, gear them up, put them on a deserted island, and give them a Free For All, Battle Royale style! Winner wins 10 million dollars, or bottlecaps, whichever is worth mroe at the time.

I blame consoles and casual game(r)s.
 

ThorUK

New member
Dec 11, 2008
158
0
0
WraithGadra said:
I suppose I shouldn't be surprised that this thread is full of the standard "How DARE other people enjoy MY HOBBY!" whining. I can understand not liking the show, even though I find it entertaining. I can understand not liking the people on the show. I can understand being annoyed at the people responsible for the show. What I don't understand is this "ruining the hobby" nonsense. How exactly does a not very popular TV show affect how you spend your free time in any way? The WCG doesn't have any input on what games get made and bought. Competitive gaming has been put on TV before and the industry has moved on just fine. Get over yourselves.

The other things I don't understand is the posturing (I can walk all over them!) and the "Games aren't meant to be competitive" statements. In the former, you don't have enough information to definitively say that. In the latter, who says? Why do they say that? You can compete in anything if you want to and can find someone else who wants to as well. It's ridiculous to say "You can't enjoy this product that way" when it doesn't affect anyone else.
I think what bothers most people is the fact that they would get associated with a "casual gamer" look - i.e. the public perception of people who play games as a large proportion of their free time will be shaped by programmes such as those. It's a disturbing and troubling thought, but people's opinions and perceptions can be very heavily shaped by what they see on TV.

I for one look down on casual and (some) console games, since they often defeat the point of gaming for me (ie in a FPS I expect a certain amount of realism, games like TF2 and BF Heroes just don't work for me).
 

NeoDeath90

New member
Feb 11, 2009
451
0
0
Haha, oh, I watched that one day and almost shed a tear while looking at my hard earned 360. I bought that thing with two week's worth of paychecks, and I thought to myself "I'm sorry, my friend. They're turning us into a mockery."
 

twistedshadows

New member
Apr 26, 2009
905
0
0
ThorUK said:
I blame consoles and casual game(r)s.
Why do you blame consoles? I can understand why the rising trend of casual games might have something to do with it (to a degree), but there are hardcore gamers out there who game on consoles.
 

twistedshadows

New member
Apr 26, 2009
905
0
0
The whole thing is ridiculous. I hate reality shows to begin with, but this just brought it to a whole new level.
 

Kirosilence

New member
Nov 28, 2007
405
0
0
Uh.. Dg.. Uhhg.. FAIL FAIL FAIL!

YOU ARE BUILT OF FAIL! You shall be rendered into such! Uhg, I thought we would resist reality TV longer than this, gaming has been tainted.
 

SimuLord

Whom Gods Annoy
Aug 20, 2008
10,077
0
0
nilcypher said:
I really don't see what the problem is here. Yes the show looks stupid, but no one is forcing you to watch it. Besides, it's a sign that gaming is becoming a mainstream activity, which is a good thing surely?
(wanted to address this last night, didn't want to double-post, so you get it today)

No. It most emphatically is NOT a good thing. At risk of treading on the same ground as Scott Ramsoomair (who said it as well as anyone), the last thing we need is more shovelware-buying lowest-common-denominator yahoos polluting our hobby with their insistence on Flanderized crap. Having gaming go mainstream attracts the wrong kind of attention, attention we'd all be better off without.

Look at Fallout 2. That game was as close to "mature" and "adult" as I've ever seen. Drugs, child killing, a city that in its futuristic dystopia is...well, exactly like Reno in 2009 only with more radiation and Jet instead of crystal meth, but I digress. Fallout 3 couldn't walk that same line because it's a mainstream blockbuster and if they made too much of the seedier elements of Capitol Wasteland society the media would've thrown a shit fit so we got severely Flanderized Fallout instead. Yeah, it was a great game, Bethesda Softworks' guys know what they're doing, but it wasn't Fallout in anything but name. The Jack Thompsons and Hillary Clintons and Leland Yees of the world have ensured that games will never be able to fly far enough under the radar to make another Fallout 2 possible.

In the endless chase for money whole genres have fallen by the wayside because they're neither cheap enough to make nor dumbed-down enough to sell. City builders are practically extinct, point-and-click adventures are only viable on shoestring budgets and electronic distribution models and show up in retail as either shovelware or rarities, and what we're left with is an industry where everything is either huge-budget eye candy for the masses or glorified Flash games sold to the casual market. And let's not even get started on stuff like Imagine: Fashion Designer; as my wife put it, "if my mom bought me something like that instead of Starcraft back when I was 12 I'd think games are stupid too" when we saw "Pet Vet: Horsez" or something equally stupid on a recent trip to Best Buy and I pointed out that those games sell really well to parents of 9-to-12 year old girls.

When gamers could stay safely out of sight, out of mind, and under the radar, we got classic games by the bucketload. Now that the ignorant Great Unwashed are the core audience, the people who built the industry from the ground up, the consumers that made the whole business possible in the first place, we don't matter anymore. There aren't enough of us and there will never be enough of us because if gaming was the sort of hobby where anyone could be hardcore, those old genres would still sell. As far as I'm concerned I'd rather be a closeted gamer, revealing that fact only when, say, a coworker saw me at Best Buy with a copy of Empire: Total War in my hands rather than seeing a disgusting funhouse mirror image of gamers on Sci-Fi or SyFy or FuckOffAndDie or whatever the fuck that channel's calling itself these days.

Then again, I'm not trying to generate web traffic and income to a website about games that benefits from having more pairs of eyes looking at it. I'm just gazing forlornly at my collection of city builders and trade sims and realizing it's been over four years since anyone made a good one (Port Royale 2, released in September of '04, and the company that made it doesn't make trade games anymore).
 

SharPhoe

The Nice-talgia Kerrick
Feb 28, 2009
2,617
0
0
SimuLord said:
No. It most emphatically is NOT a good thing. At risk of treading on the same ground as Scott Ramsoomair (who said it as well as anyone), the last thing we need is more shovelware-buying lowest-common-denominator yahoos polluting our hobby with their insistence on Flanderized crap. Having gaming go mainstream attracts the wrong kind of attention, attention we'd all be better off without.
-snip-
...Can I warrant a guess here and say that you've probably perused the TV Tropes Wiki before?
 

Deleric

New member
Dec 29, 2008
1,393
0
0
Better Idea. Find the best Call of Duty: Modern Warfare player in the entire world.

Then send them to Iraq.
 

SimuLord

Whom Gods Annoy
Aug 20, 2008
10,077
0
0
SharPhoe said:
SimuLord said:
No. It most emphatically is NOT a good thing. At risk of treading on the same ground as Scott Ramsoomair (who said it as well as anyone), the last thing we need is more shovelware-buying lowest-common-denominator yahoos polluting our hobby with their insistence on Flanderized crap. Having gaming go mainstream attracts the wrong kind of attention, attention we'd all be better off without.
-snip-
...Can I warrant a guess here and say that you've probably perused the TV Tropes Wiki before?
I've been using "lowest common denominator" since...well, early 1990s at any rate, but you're absolutely right that I'm a Troper and lifted "Flanderized" from that site.
 

McGee

New member
Mar 31, 2009
217
0
0
That looked........God awful. Some of those things would be fun with friends, like Halo 3 paintball, but put it on a reality show and it becomes the dumbest thing ever.
 

Logan Westbrook

Transform, Roll Out, Etc
Feb 21, 2008
17,672
0
0
SimuLord said:
Trimmed away for length
You're completely correct, you can see in in other media too. After all, there's no such thing as a good TV show or a good movie or even good books anymore.

Sarcasm aside, if gaming becomes more mainstream, the customer base increases which means developers and publishers make more money and with a sufficiently stable source of income, they become more willing to take risks, because they know that one game isn't going to ruin them.

There's a precendent for this in fact with Ico, released when Sony were making money hand over fist with the Playstation, and again with Shadow of the Colossus, when they were making loads of the back of the Playstation 2.

And perhaps you're happy to skulk in the shadows, but personally I'm bored of feeling slightly embarrassed when I admit that I'm a gamer to someone and I'm bored of gaming getting blamed every time some kid goes nuts with a gun, because gaming is still misunderstood by the general public. If gaming continues to be the elitist paradise you want it to be, it will continue to draw the ire of the Clintons and Thompsons of this world and only by appealing to a broader audience will gaming progress its self-imposed ghetto
 

SharPhoe

The Nice-talgia Kerrick
Feb 28, 2009
2,617
0
0
nilcypher said:
Sarcasm aside, if gaming becomes more mainstream, the customer base increases which means developers and publishers make more money and with a sufficiently stable source of income, they become more willing to take risks, because they know that one game isn't going to ruin them.

There's a precendent for this in fact with Ico, released when Sony were making money hand over fist with the Playstation, and again with Shadow of the Colossus, when they were making loads of the back of the Playstation 2.

And perhaps you're happy to skulk in the shadows, but personally I'm bored of feeling slightly embarrassed when I admit that I'm a gamer to someone and I'm bored of gaming getting blamed every time some kid goes nuts with a gun, because gaming is still misunderstood by the general public. If gaming continues to be the elitist paradise you want it to be, it will continue to draw the ire of the Clintons and Thompsons of this world and only by appealing to a broader audience will gaming progress.
Wow... that cut deep. but I can see the point you're making. Positive stereotyping, even if poorly done, is still positive.