Not really. My typical play style is go into sneak mode, summon a monster to distract people, and snipe them off, one by one from a nearby tree. Other people would just get in the way. Me and my spider daedra have been doing fine on our own.
I Wish Skyrim Had Co-op Anybody Agree?
- Thread starter Legion IV
- Start date
Recommended Videos
A. play with someone else because:Jaranja said:
B. the person you're playing with isn't your friend anymore
Here we go, someone who doesn't want co-op. I ain't gonna yell at you or call you an idiot. All im gonna say is: You don't HAVE to play Co-Op if you don't want to. And I can understand some people not wanting to.DuctTapeJedi said:
Anyway, disregard what I just said and PLAY CO-OP,
Rimmy
I have one thing to say to that idea...
SQUEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHHHH.
*Cough*.
But yes, me and my best friend 13 year old girl about skyrim every few days, as were both devout WRPG fanatics, and each spent hundreds of hours on oblivion and morrowind, Frankly the only think stopping skyrim from being the best game I ever play would be the ability for us to terrorize the games inhabitants together xD.
Sadly, its just not a co-op IP, and that's rarely subject to change this late into a games career.
Even still..Sqeeeeeeh and whatnot.
SQUEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHHHH.
*Cough*.
But yes, me and my best friend 13 year old girl about skyrim every few days, as were both devout WRPG fanatics, and each spent hundreds of hours on oblivion and morrowind, Frankly the only think stopping skyrim from being the best game I ever play would be the ability for us to terrorize the games inhabitants together xD.
Sadly, its just not a co-op IP, and that's rarely subject to change this late into a games career.
Even still..Sqeeeeeeh and whatnot.
Looks like noone really noticed what i posted. Its all just singleplayer this singeplayer that. I gave a good reason and thought it would be great.
heres my real question, what could it hurt to add it?
Plus people are saying how it would work blah blah. Like i said use the system SAints Row 2 Co-op worked.
If the only argument is, its singleplayer and it'll break immersion then thats just stupid.
If there was co-op in oblivion imagine the fun itd be hunting with a friend for this fabled unicorn i never saw. Or raiding a dark dungeon. Better yet, planning a infiltration of the castle and taking out a key figure.
Fine dont make it so you cant do the main plot. I dont care i was mainly refering to the stuff you could do with your pal. Just imagine them putting all these easter eggs in the game, mabye making some places un fast travelible, you and your buddy steal or hop on a horse and GRAND adventure ensues! Who knows what you'll find on your way there, hopefully you might run into an abbonded camp halfway there to take a much needed rest and check your rations. On your way there you might find a an odd looking area off in the forest and you'll find its a cult of warlocks. Am talking just imagine a real world, ever evolving, always changing somthings always happing, so much unknown. All you have is you and your buddy. Morrowind did this all it was legendary, all it missed was that co-op.
It just seems like everyone here is letting the game do the roleplaying for them, mabey people forget of rpgs of the old. Just let the game tell you what to do, follow and complete.
its just sad, look say the excuse of "itd take to long for them to do it" I'll accept that but these arguments of SP only. its crap. its just sad. Also like i said not massive co-op just 2 player, 4 player max.
heres my real question, what could it hurt to add it?
Plus people are saying how it would work blah blah. Like i said use the system SAints Row 2 Co-op worked.
If the only argument is, its singleplayer and it'll break immersion then thats just stupid.
If there was co-op in oblivion imagine the fun itd be hunting with a friend for this fabled unicorn i never saw. Or raiding a dark dungeon. Better yet, planning a infiltration of the castle and taking out a key figure.
Fine dont make it so you cant do the main plot. I dont care i was mainly refering to the stuff you could do with your pal. Just imagine them putting all these easter eggs in the game, mabye making some places un fast travelible, you and your buddy steal or hop on a horse and GRAND adventure ensues! Who knows what you'll find on your way there, hopefully you might run into an abbonded camp halfway there to take a much needed rest and check your rations. On your way there you might find a an odd looking area off in the forest and you'll find its a cult of warlocks. Am talking just imagine a real world, ever evolving, always changing somthings always happing, so much unknown. All you have is you and your buddy. Morrowind did this all it was legendary, all it missed was that co-op.
It just seems like everyone here is letting the game do the roleplaying for them, mabey people forget of rpgs of the old. Just let the game tell you what to do, follow and complete.
its just sad, look say the excuse of "itd take to long for them to do it" I'll accept that but these arguments of SP only. its crap. its just sad. Also like i said not massive co-op just 2 player, 4 player max.
I could see it working with a few restrictions if only to test the waters.
I'd limit it to two players a time.
I'd limit it to two players a time.
Together we stand against the tide of single players!Legion IV said:
Or maybe just some guys on the forum but anyway.
I love immersion. But not everything has to be immersive. For example, the ArmA 2 campagian was so immersive it was like getting sucked down a drain into the ocean of immersion. However, the multi-player (while still fucking awesome) wasn't AS immersive. And how is two people not immersive? What? It's okay to have one person saving the world but two AND OH GOD IT'S A CLUSTERFUCK! Really?
Co-op..... just co-op,
Rimmy
It's easy enough to throw a half-assed co-op option for people that enjoy it. Resistance fall of man did this great. Basically just nonsensically double up the main character, and increase the difficulty a tad to account for it. If people find it would be game breaking they can just play singleplayer, you shouldn't selfishly say no to it just because you don't want it yourself. There's something really really special about co-op that has yet to be really tapped into in a meaningful game. Sure I can enjoy resident evil 5 style co-op but I think it would be amazing to play a deep rpg where companions are controlled by others, who can all go their own way or stick together and experience quests and cultural exploration together.