If you could rule any country other then your own, what would it be?
- Thread starter Guvnorium
- Start date
Recommended Videos
No, if you want a small country go with Liechtenstien, it's only 160 square kilometres.Fingolfin High-King of the Noldor said:I would control Luxembourg because I have always found interesting and it's small enough that I don't have that much crap to worry about.
Luxembourg has a very good GDP.olaffub42 said:No, if you want a small country go with Liechtenstien, it's only 160 square kilometres.Fingolfin High-King of the Noldor said:I would control Luxembourg because I have always found interesting and it's small enough that I don't have that much crap to worry about.
Venezuela: Reasoning is simple. This is a nation with a significant oil reserve found in a beautiful tropical landscape that I am comfortable within. it is also home to one of the races of history I am greatly interested in and would allow for further study of this long lost culture.
The people are already pro-socialist, understanding the benefits of government based corporative bodies and how good they can be for everyone, not just the rich. They have also proven, thrice, to rise up in support of their leaders when larger nations like the US or their own rich population try and stage a coup. They are very much socialists, which is what happens when the government uses corporate money to give them homes and food. I would further that, giving them information networks, government owned manufacturing bases, and a range of other programs designed to be a bizarre blending of fascism (Government and business in cahoots) and socialism. All designed to make any nation stronger, wealthier and of course better off.
I would feel safer with such people backing me then say the US, in which the people would resist every move I put forth to make their lives better through socialism. Propaganda is too think in the US for any successful move for the government to bettering it's people. They don't want any of that 'icky socialism' crap even if it means the difference between their own family eating or starving.
The people are already pro-socialist, understanding the benefits of government based corporative bodies and how good they can be for everyone, not just the rich. They have also proven, thrice, to rise up in support of their leaders when larger nations like the US or their own rich population try and stage a coup. They are very much socialists, which is what happens when the government uses corporate money to give them homes and food. I would further that, giving them information networks, government owned manufacturing bases, and a range of other programs designed to be a bizarre blending of fascism (Government and business in cahoots) and socialism. All designed to make any nation stronger, wealthier and of course better off.
I would feel safer with such people backing me then say the US, in which the people would resist every move I put forth to make their lives better through socialism. Propaganda is too think in the US for any successful move for the government to bettering it's people. They don't want any of that 'icky socialism' crap even if it means the difference between their own family eating or starving.
But does Luxembourg have an airport, why yes it does, does Liechtenstein absoluetely not.Fingolfin High-King of the Noldor said:Luxembourg has a very good GDP.olaffub42 said:No, if you want a small country go with Liechtenstien, it's only 160 square kilometres.Fingolfin High-King of the Noldor said:I would control Luxembourg because I have always found interesting and it's small enough that I don't have that much crap to worry about.
Although I have been to Luxembourg it is really nice.
North Korea, imagine the total power. You could get those people to do anything you want....ANYTHING!
Oh I'd sooooo have Azerbaijan, just because of the name. I've never been able to bring it up in normal conversation regularly without nonsensically derailing the discussion, but if I ruled there all would be well.
