Why is not a good enough question ^-^tzimize said:Because is not a good enough/an answer! >:|El Poncho said:
Questions need to have a point. Simply asking someone why is a valid enough question as because is a valid enough answer.tzimize said:Well only gramatically, it lacks a question mark, and besides god would know anyway, and I dont think god would be a grammar nazi :>Hubilub said:Askingtzimize said:Because is not a good enough/an answer! >:|El Poncho said:himme why is not really a question.
HA!
God would know what I asked, I shouldnt even have to say it, but feeling I need to I would ask "why?".El Poncho said:Why is not a good enough question ^-^tzimize said:Because is not a good enough/an answer! >:|El Poncho said:
Not really. As I said, god would know why "what" and the "what" would be "everything", because is not sufficient to answer that. Or anything. Unless the question is: How do you spell "because"? or something like that.Hubilub said:Questions need to have a point. Simply asking someone why is a valid enough question as because is a valid enough answer.tzimize said:Well only gramatically, it lacks a question mark, and besides god would know anyway, and I dont think god would be a grammar nazi :>Hubilub said:Askingtzimize said:Because is not a good enough/an answer! >:|El Poncho said:himme why is not really a question.
HA!
Dude thats deep.tzimize said:God would know what I asked, I shouldnt even have to say it, but feeling I need to I would ask "why?".El Poncho said:Why is not a good enough question ^-^tzimize said:Because is not a good enough/an answer! >:|El Poncho said:
But that is drawing the conclusion that you would be able to comprehend the answer. If God certainly was real, then the saying that trying to explain how God acts is like trying to explain to an ant how a TV works would apply, therefore he would know that even trying to answer that question in a way that you would understand would be impossible, and therefore the answer "Because" is as good as you're ever going to understand why.tzimize said:Not really. As I said, god would know why "what" and the "what" would be "everything", because is not sufficient to answer that. Or anything. Unless the question is: How do you spell "because"? or something like that.Hubilub said:Questions need to have a point. Simply asking someone why is a valid enough question as because is a valid enough answer.tzimize said:Well only gramatically, it lacks a question mark, and besides god would know anyway, and I dont think god would be a grammar nazi :>Hubilub said:Askingtzimize said:Because is not a good enough/an answer! >:|El Poncho said:himme why is not really a question.
HA!
If god is omnipotent I am sure he is powerful enough to eitherHubilub said:But that is drawing the conclusion that you would be able to comprehend the answer. If God certainly was real, then the saying that trying to explain how God acts is like trying to explain to an ant how a TV works would apply, therefore he would know that even trying to answer that question in a way that you would understand would be impossible, and therefore the answer "Because" is as good as you're ever going to understand why.tzimize said:Not really. As I said, god would know why "what" and the "what" would be "everything", because is not sufficient to answer that. Or anything. Unless the question is: How do you spell "because"? or something like that.Hubilub said:Questions need to have a point. Simply asking someone why is a valid enough question as because is a valid enough answer.tzimize said:Well only gramatically, it lacks a question mark, and besides god would know anyway, and I dont think god would be a grammar nazi :>Hubilub said:Askingtzimize said:Because is not a good enough/an answer! >:|El Poncho said:himme why is not really a question.
HA!
I just say that to keep the damn paparazzi of my ass.sinclose said:I thought you weren't married.Hubilub said:"Not good I'm afraid. I haven't been getting any poontang ever since I forced my son to die for the sins of all mankind.Hazy said:"So... how's the wife?"
2000 years without sex is something not even God can handle, I'll tell you that."
Then God would have to make you Omniscient, and I seriously doubt he would let one simple man become Omniscient, if even for a second.tzimize said:If god is omnipotent I am sure he is powerful enough to eitherHubilub said:But that is drawing the conclusion that you would be able to comprehend the answer. If God certainly was real, then the saying that trying to explain how God acts is like trying to explain to an ant how a TV works would apply, therefore he would know that even trying to answer that question in a way that you would understand would be impossible, and therefore the answer "Because" is as good as you're ever going to understand why.tzimize said:Not really. As I said, god would know why "what" and the "what" would be "everything", because is not sufficient to answer that. Or anything. Unless the question is: How do you spell "because"? or something like that.Hubilub said:Questions need to have a point. Simply asking someone why is a valid enough question as because is a valid enough answer.tzimize said:Well only gramatically, it lacks a question mark, and besides god would know anyway, and I dont think god would be a grammar nazi :>Hubilub said:Askingtzimize said:Because is not a good enough/an answer! >:|El Poncho said:himme why is not really a question.
HA!
1: Be smart enough to explain it to me in an understandable way or
2: Make me smart enough to understand it
Actually, God had to have created literally everything if it exists. Swimming pool manufacturers didn't build the universe from scratch, but God did.squidbuddy99 said:You know, God. The Creator. Allah. Whatever ethereal origin of life ou have.Decoy Doctorpus said:Technically God (if he exists) didn't invent cerebral edemas any more than swimming pool manufacturers invented drowning.squidbuddy99 said:First I would buy him a Coke for creating the movie and martial arts legend that was Bruce Lee, my role model. Then I'd slap it out of his hands for inventing cerebral edemas. Douche.
As for your question. Hard to answer really. Which version of God are dealing with?
Oh, and I'm still not going to forgive him for the oedema thing.
Does that mean if I catch you you will grant me three wishes?! *lays Hubilub traps*Hubilub said:I'd say "Hey, who put this mirror in front of me?"
That's right. I am God.
I find that just as likely as me being allowed to meet him and ask him a question. Its a "what if" thread after all.Hubilub said:Then God would have to make you Omniscient, and I seriously doubt he would let one simple man become Omniscient, if even for a second.tzimize said:If god is omnipotent I am sure he is powerful enough to eitherHubilub said:But that is drawing the conclusion that you would be able to comprehend the answer. If God certainly was real, then the saying that trying to explain how God acts is like trying to explain to an ant how a TV works would apply, therefore he would know that even trying to answer that question in a way that you would understand would be impossible, and therefore the answer "Because" is as good as you're ever going to understand why.tzimize said:Not really. As I said, god would know why "what" and the "what" would be "everything", because is not sufficient to answer that. Or anything. Unless the question is: How do you spell "because"? or something like that.Hubilub said:Questions need to have a point. Simply asking someone why is a valid enough question as because is a valid enough answer.tzimize said:Well only gramatically, it lacks a question mark, and besides god would know anyway, and I dont think god would be a grammar nazi :>Hubilub said:Askingtzimize said:Because is not a good enough/an answer! >:|El Poncho said:himme why is not really a question.
HA!
1: Be smart enough to explain it to me in an understandable way or
2: Make me smart enough to understand it
Alright, so let's say that God makes you omniscient so that you can comprehend his answer.tzimize said:I find that just as likely as me being allowed to meet him and ask him a question. Its a "what if" thread after all.Hubilub said:Then God would have to make you Omniscient, and I seriously doubt he would let one simple man become Omniscient, if even for a second.tzimize said:If god is omnipotent I am sure he is powerful enough to eitherHubilub said:But that is drawing the conclusion that you would be able to comprehend the answer. If God certainly was real, then the saying that trying to explain how God acts is like trying to explain to an ant how a TV works would apply, therefore he would know that even trying to answer that question in a way that you would understand would be impossible, and therefore the answer "Because" is as good as you're ever going to understand why.tzimize said:Not really. As I said, god would know why "what" and the "what" would be "everything", because is not sufficient to answer that. Or anything. Unless the question is: How do you spell "because"? or something like that.Hubilub said:Questions need to have a point. Simply asking someone why is a valid enough question as because is a valid enough answer.tzimize said:Well only gramatically, it lacks a question mark, and besides god would know anyway, and I dont think god would be a grammar nazi :>Hubilub said:Askingtzimize said:Because is not a good enough/an answer! >:|El Poncho said:himme why is not really a question.
HA!
1: Be smart enough to explain it to me in an understandable way or
2: Make me smart enough to understand it