Well, like movies the market is flooded with games/movies.. much more now than ever before. Most use reviews as a guideline to steer them toward or away from certain games so the few they buy per month/year are of quality and not mass produced crap. Its not perfect, but it really helps weed thru the Kane & Lynchs of the world.EvilPicnic said:I think this is part of the problem. Unlike movies (which have become somewhat codified) games are so varying in style that being 'the best at what it is and does' isn't enough. There are too many fields that a game can be 'the best' of:- RTS, JRPG, MMORPG, FPS etc etc. - that these scores don't translate across genre.Googenstien said:I expect scores for it to be in the 9-10 range. Its the best of what it is and does
We need a new metric for judging games by. The only reason publications continue to use /10 is to make headlines (such as IGN Gives Uncharted 3 a 10 out of 10), to sell games for publishing partners, and laziness.
Now of course there is influence and if you go to different sites/blogs for reviews you can get a better idea and see where advertising and trinkets influenced a score to sell games. I wouldnt put it past every major site has this happen.. I know many times I pegged PC Gamer as one years ago for having full sized ads of a game where within they also rave about it.
A new system would be good but people have been trying this with movies now for years.. thumbs up/down, See it!/miss it!, 0-100 scale... Nothing really took off and 0-10 seems to be, as you said best for headlines
I am not going to buy every game out there to find a good one and will use sites like IGN, Gamespot, this site, blogs, classic game room.. and use those reviews to get a better idea of how a game is.