IGN's top 25 consoles of all time [Completed listing]

Recommended Videos

theultimateend

New member
Nov 1, 2007
3,621
0
0
Is it odd that I hated almost all the systems on that list and thought they were terrible?

If half that list died in a fire the world would be better off (no particular half, just roughly 10 systems or so).

Julianking93 said:
You're the first person to actually act rationally to this. I do have my view and that is PS3 is better, you have your's and that is 360's better, its your opinion, I know I can't change that so I'm not going to.

But as for the part about exclusives, almost all 360 exclusives are on PC and to name a game that's been proted to PS3 that was originally a 360 exclusive; Bioshock.

And the 360 failure rate has not been exaggerated. Its been confirmed that its 54.6% The console is good, I like the idea of a 360. I enjoy Gears of War (which I can get on PC) but that's the only exclusive I like. But the console it self is shit. The hard ware sucks, you can't deny that.

And, on a side note, why the fuck is the Wii at number 10????!!!
Yeah as I mentioned before I'm the only person of all my friends and colleagues who hasn't had to purchase a second 360. I do play mine less and it is a newer one so that might be it but it still is startling how many different people with different lifestyles had their consoles break.

I don't think any of the systems I own have broken other than a PS2 and it had way too many hours on it for me to bash it.

I didn't understand the allure of the PS3 until I recently grabbed a slim. There is something about the presentation of everything on it that is so satisfying. Likewise I find that all my 360 games are better on my PC anyways (mostly because they can actually be modded and once I'm done with them I can cheat on them). Likewise it wasn't until I owned a PS3 that I actually bought a digital game.

The microsoft point system is so unfriendly to me. I hate doing the conversion in my head since the points are not one for one. I get on the PSN and I see the exact dollar price (plus tax at checkout) of whatever I want. I like that. When I was in Japan I left thinking I was poor and ended up having 85 dollars in change because of dealing with their different currency system, that sort of stuff would happen in reverse on the Xbox Live marketplace, I'd figure I am only spending 5 bucks each time and forget its something like 7.50.

As for the Wii (again which I own) it does have small but solid collection of games, however on the flip side it has what...thousands of shovelware titles now? It's a shame that it is so easy to produce something on the Wii and have it sell.

For each current gen console I can think of roughly 5 games that I absolutely love and roughly 3-5 more that aren't too bad. The major negative for the 360 is that (I believe) every one of those games for it I already own on my PC. Maybe that's not a negative though, perhaps I should applaud companies for releasing them to both for convenience.
 

VanityGirl

New member
Apr 29, 2009
3,472
0
0
I'm glad the 360 was up there. I do have to agree that the online for the 360 is absolutely amazing. I prefer it to PSN mainly because of the ways I can keep in touch with my friends.

I was surprised PS3 was so low though, I figured because of bluray it would be higher up, but I guess not. :(
 

Magnatek

A Miserable Pile of Honesty
Jul 17, 2009
1,695
0
0
Sega Genesis actually made top 5? That's cool. I didn't expect it to be that high (Personally was expecting #8). Of course, it's obvious why NES topped this chart. Without that, the console craze would never have truly started (Sorry, Atari fans, but them's the breaks in the ****** Review(+2 points in my book for figuring out the word and getting that reference)).
 

tsolless

New member
Jul 15, 2009
243
0
0
I agreed with the list for the most part. I personally prefer some of these consoles over another and my list would be different but after seeing their criteria I can see why this was arranged like it was.
 

Ninja_X

New member
Aug 9, 2009
616
0
0
I'm happy to see the playstation 1 and 2 so high on the list.

PS2 especially, deserves one of the top spots. :)
 

Spicy meatball

New member
Feb 17, 2009
170
0
0
Ah!!!.. the better console finally won. The shining light that launched all other shining lights.

You shall be missed NES!
 

Dys

New member
Sep 10, 2008
2,343
0
0
obliterate said:
Dude why is the ps3 in 15th place...dude the first xbox is in 11 what the hell ?
Somehow the xbox 360 beat the original xbox. I don't dislike my xbox 360 or anything, but it sure as all hell hasn't been as influencial, I can't think of a single exclusive that wasn't a sequal to an earlier game (Halo, Fable etc). Surely microsofts introduction of online multiplayer to console gamers is more significant than...umm, shiny graphics and recycled games? Am I missing something significant here?
 

Spicy meatball

New member
Feb 17, 2009
170
0
0
Pendragon9 said:
Yep. More proof IGN is full of dimwitted and biased idiots.
Did you even read the reviewing criteria or their reasons for why the NES was picked for #1?.

I'm sure you didn't but here is why:

Prior to 1985 in the US, Nintendo was a strong name in the arcade with Donkey Kong and it was cleaning up in the toy aisle with its Game & Watch handhelds. But the home console industry was buried under the figurative dust after the industry collapsed on itself, and "videogame" was considered a bad word. Nintendo set to change all that with the Nintendo Entertainment System.

The company was already seeing insane success with the Famicom in Japan with its release in 1983, and after two years, it was time to bring that success to a new territory. After a failed attempt to partner with Atari to bring the system to the US, the company decided to do the job itself. The Famicom hardware was given a sleeker, more Western-friendly appearance, and the NES was born. The initial release in 1985 was only a test in specific US markets, but it was shipped across the country after the Holiday season in 1986.

Nintendo instituted a strict licensing program to ensure that the industry crash ? with its glut of games of questionable quality -- would not happen with the NES. No unlicensed games would be tolerated on the NES platform. All games would have to be approved by Nintendo and third parties could only create a certain number of games a year for the NES, while the same games could not be made for competing consoles for two years.

The strategy worked. Nintendo's quality first-party efforts as well as the incredibly powerful third-party support resurged and revived the home videogame industry. If Nintendo didn't step up to the plate, the industry as a whole may have turned out entirely different.
Now if you disagree fine, but you need to have a reason as to why you disagree other than "they are full of dimwitted and biased idiots"
 

Pendragon9

New member
Apr 26, 2009
1,968
0
0
Spicy meatball said:
Pendragon9 said:
Yep. More proof IGN is full of dimwitted and biased idiots.
Did you even read the reviewing criteria or their reasons for why the NES was picked for #1?.

I'm sure you didn't but here is why:

Prior to 1985 in the US, Nintendo was a strong name in the arcade with Donkey Kong and it was cleaning up in the toy aisle with its Game & Watch handhelds. But the home console industry was buried under the figurative dust after the industry collapsed on itself, and "videogame" was considered a bad word. Nintendo set to change all that with the Nintendo Entertainment System.

The company was already seeing insane success with the Famicom in Japan with its release in 1983, and after two years, it was time to bring that success to a new territory. After a failed attempt to partner with Atari to bring the system to the US, the company decided to do the job itself. The Famicom hardware was given a sleeker, more Western-friendly appearance, and the NES was born. The initial release in 1985 was only a test in specific US markets, but it was shipped across the country after the Holiday season in 1986.

Nintendo instituted a strict licensing program to ensure that the industry crash ? with its glut of games of questionable quality -- would not happen with the NES. No unlicensed games would be tolerated on the NES platform. All games would have to be approved by Nintendo and third parties could only create a certain number of games a year for the NES, while the same games could not be made for competing consoles for two years.

The strategy worked. Nintendo's quality first-party efforts as well as the incredibly powerful third-party support resurged and revived the home videogame industry. If Nintendo didn't step up to the plate, the industry as a whole may have turned out entirely different.
Now if you disagree fine, but you need to have a reason as to why you disagree other than "they are full of dimwitted and biased idiots"
I'm referring to their placings of the 360, Wii and PS3. They have it so damn jumbled up, and for no good reason other than they think the 360 is SO ZOMG AWESOME. The Then they put the Wii up with the N64, even though the Wii has done nothing to deserve that spot. Motion controls, big deal. IT's nothing compared to the first true 3d games like Super Mario 64. They didn't even have a strong listing of games when they came out, whereas the N64 had a myriad of games and kept them coming.

The Gamecube did more than the 360 ever could, but apparently people just love skipping over good games. Yes, the 360 has online andhasa bunch of games, but it did nothing for the industry.Everything was already there when the 360 decided to come in. Games already had online when it came in, yet people like to say the 360 just suddenly put it on the map. Also, the Ps1 beats it in EVERY SINGLE CATEGORY. Online play is nothing compared to revolutionizing 3d games.

Now, as much as i don't like to admit it, the Ps3's placing isn't too far off. It's great, but it too didn't really bring too much to the table.The blu ray is very nice, but every single person here hates it because it's cool to hate on the new format. So not much I can say there.

However,it should be above the original XBOX. Come on. I know it's IGN. They're biased against the Ps3. They always have been. So i see why they put it so low.

I would've done the list very differently. The few things I agree with were the PS2's and NES's listing, but I do not like the atari's place on there. besides Nostalgia,I just don't see it beating the PS2. Criteria or not.

Edit: While I'm editing, I'm gonna go ahead and agree with Caz below this post. I read the criteria, and the list just didn't really match.
 

caz105

New member
Feb 22, 2009
311
0
0
How has the 360 influenced the game industry? Surely the PS3 and Wii were a bigger influence with the beginning of blu-ray and motion tracking (respectively) becoming mainstream. The 360 had the first good online for consoles, but the PC had that for years before the Xbox.
 

Spicy meatball

New member
Feb 17, 2009
170
0
0
caz105 said:
How has the 360 influenced the game industry? Surely the PS3 and Wii were a bigger influence with the beginning of blu-ray and motion tracking (respectively) becoming mainstream. The 360 had the first good online for consoles, but the PC had that for years before the Xbox.
True, but the PC isn't a console and infact, the Xbox was the first console to match the PC in FPS gaming and combat interface interface. i.e- Halo and the 360 ran with it. With Live and overall better sequels. Also it was the first with the integrated wireless controller that did not need an external dongle for connectivity.

Blue ray is amazing as a technology but revolutionary?. I'm sorry if it was there would be such a rush to collect blue ray players/ blue ray movies right now, but there just isn't. Besides, with the next gen xbox looking at Direct Download and play capability there is little need for Blue Ray..at least for Microsoft.
 

captain awesome 12

New member
Dec 28, 2008
671
0
0
I just really don't see the need for a Top 25 Consoles list. At least in my opinion, there haven't been enough quality consoles over the past few decades to warrant a list of 25 of them. I could see something like 15 or 10, but with 25 it seemed like IGN's stretching itself and making allowances for consoles that were pretty much crap. Also, I think this should have been more specific. The hell does "Top" mean anyway? Doesn't it mean best? This seems much more like "Most Influential" than best. Oh and where the hell is the Commodore 64 on that list? One of Yahtzee's favorite games is on there how the hell could you forget it IGN? Bunch of tossers! =P
 

Joshimodo

New member
Sep 13, 2008
1,956
0
0
caz105 said:
How has the 360 influenced the game industry? Surely the PS3 and Wii were a bigger influence with the beginning of blu-ray and motion tracking (respectively) becoming mainstream. The 360 had the first good online for consoles, but the PC had that for years before the Xbox.

CONSOLE list. CONSOLE.

Blu-Ray players and motion controls were also available for PCs before consoles. They aren't listing "features that PCs did first".



captain awesome 12 said:
This seems much more like "Most Influential" than best.
Read the bloody criteria.

I agree with each placement, bar I'd swap the PS1 with the 360's placement, though that's only one spot.