Wasen't the serial killer in Se7en called John Doe?burzummaniac said:"John Doe" seems perfectly reasonable. Make it so that he mutilates his victims, making it impossible to tell their identities. When someone unknown is found dead, they are named "John Doe"
I think how he eludes capture while committing these messy murders would be pretty intense.conflictofinterests said:I'd call him caught. People that sloppy don't tend to manage the "serial" part of "serial killer" well.
If you want to write a serial killer you need to study them first, especially since the psychological profile you've given in this post doesn't actually describe a serial killer. A random whackjob? yes. Serial killer? No. For someone to actually be a serial killer, they have to fit a very distinct profile, more of a specific personality type and just being crazy and killing people isn't actually enough. If you're really interested in writing a serial killer, then I recommend looking up Whoever Fights Monsters: My Twenty Years Hunting Serial Killers for the FBI by Robert K. Resser and Tom Shachtman. It covers a lot of the biggies like Ted Bundy, John Wayne Gacy, David Berkowitz ("Son of Sam"), Charles Manson, etc. It'll give you a better idea of what it actually takes to hunt serial killers and what they're like.okogamashii said:He is completely batshit, lives in L.A and basically mutilates just about anyone he can get his hands on. Any ideas?
EDIT: Like his serial killer name ie. Jack the Ripper, the Happy Face Killer, something that the news people call him.
EDIT EDIT: He's nuts, and he kills people because of it (yeah, I know most crazy people aren't actually violent). He only kills in LA, but he's not specific to one part of the city. There's really no link between his victims, but his MO is to cut their throats, then hack up the bodies. This is done really poorly, as he has no medical knowledge. He is pretty non-specific as to where he dumps the bodies.