lol no sorry I'll be honest, I couldn't be bothered to read past the first page of posts.hazakura said:Did none of you just here what I said?
lol no sorry I'll be honest, I couldn't be bothered to read past the first page of posts.hazakura said:Did none of you just here what I said?
Someone brought this up during a university astrophysics lecture I was in a while ago. The professer practically screamed at themwerepossum said:She also beleives the moon landing was fake.
Dude, that surprises you? As an Australian, I apparently sound like Steve Irwin, and go to school and in a Kangaroo!cleverlymadeup said:my friend met a guy who told him that Canada was in the dark ages and we lived in igloos and had snow all year round, the funny part is they were standing on the shores of the detroit river, even funnier is detroit is north of windsor![]()
If only I'd been drinking while reading this...it would have come out of my nose.juandonde said:I tape broken hard drives and un used fridge magnets to my testicles at night so I don't wake up in the morning with testicular cancer.
I am sorry but there is no way at all to break lightspeed it is physically impossible, according to relativity (I would explain why that is the case but I don't want to type a book and it would only confuse everyone). We have proven it by accelerating a particle to 99% of light speed and we could not get it all the way up to light speed, the particle just kept on increasing in mass (which was exactly what it should have done according to relativity).MRMIdAS2k said:1) once out of the gravitational pull of earth, there's no air to slow you down, so (in theory) you can accelerate exponentially, and (eventually) break lightspeed. SO, all they had to do was accelerate, not to lightspeed, but it got them there REALLY quick.
Did you know just 20 nuclear warheads exploding in a close time-frame can kill the entire human race? Its very believable in my opinion. not from them exploding but the debris thrown up in the air unless its air-burst could block out the sun, killing the plants. which in turns fills the world with the dangerous gases we spew from respiration. And oxygen would then be sucked up with no exchange for more.Lord Krunk said:They actually banned a Looney Tunes episode called "Duck Dodgers" because it implied that Nuclear weapons could destroy the world.
Political correctness, and all.
Well 99% can be rounded to 100% and we can make believe. Also have you ever thought of strapping a million heat resistance plastic rockets on a golf ball and trying that?chaostheory said:I am sorry but there is no way at all to break lightspeed it is physically impossible, according to relativity (I would explain why that is the case but I don't want to type a book and it would only confuse everyone). We have proven it by accelerating a particle to 99% of light speed and we could not get it all the way up to light speed, the particle just kept on increasing in mass (which was exactly what it should have done according to relativity).MRMIdAS2k said:1) once out of the gravitational pull of earth, there's no air to slow you down, so (in theory) you can accelerate exponentially, and (eventually) break lightspeed. SO, all they had to do was accelerate, not to lightspeed, but it got them there REALLY quick.
I know that, that's what makes my statement so hilariously outrageous.Bulletinmybrain said:Did you know just 20 nuclear warheads exploding in a close time-frame can kill the entire human race? Its very believable in my opinion. not from them exploding but the debris thrown up in the air unless its air-burst could block out the sun, killing the plants. which in turns fills the world with the dangerous gases we spew from respiration. And oxygen would then be sucked up with no exchange for more.Lord Krunk said:They actually banned a Looney Tunes episode called "Duck Dodgers" because it implied that Nuclear weapons could destroy the world.
Political correctness, and all.
Thats why i'm for a missle defense system. Even if it costs a trill dollars I think human life living is worth whatever it takes.Lord Krunk said:I know that, that's what makes my statement so hilariously outrageous.Bulletinmybrain said:Did you know just 20 nuclear warheads exploding in a close time-frame can kill the entire human race? Its very believable in my opinion. not from them exploding but the debris thrown up in the air unless its air-burst could block out the sun, killing the plants. which in turns fills the world with the dangerous gases we spew from respiration. And oxygen would then be sucked up with no exchange for more.Lord Krunk said:They actually banned a Looney Tunes episode called "Duck Dodgers" because it implied that Nuclear weapons could destroy the world.
Political correctness, and all.
But it's true, you know!
Yeah I talked about that. But still with the rising strength of nukes big stuff can still happen.Alotak said:Yer, but most Nukes are airburst because it causes the most destruction at ground level.
Also the most stupid thing i think people have ever believed was when War of the Worlds was broadcast in america. ho ho ho. Fools