did you consider that videogame programmers just may not be experts on romantic interaction in the irst place?
True, but even a well scripted romance like in AC:B can be enough. You have enough control that you do things for the romance/lover, but when it comes to interaction it's all scripted. I think it is a good stepping stone. I don't much like the BioWare interactive romance, especially not in DA2.Bad Jim said:The main problem with romance in games is that games are an interactive medium. You can script romance, but to do it interactively requires an AI that can pass as human. Romantic interests that are clearly based on simple game mechanics are not very compelling.
And clearly, all girls like Twilight. In fact, I'm sacrificing a kitten to New Moon right now, as all women must do.Panda Mania said:Of course the developers are missing out on a huge chunk of the market. If anyone disagrees with that, I give you...Twilight.
No. Can't you people fucking read? Half of this thread is of people assuming the OP was making a generalisation about all women, simply because he found romance to be a poorly attached aspect of gaming, and that is detrimental to the enjoyment of those who like games with a good romance (like his girlfriend). He never said that all girls must have romance in games. He just pointed out that it is a large part of the market that is being unsubscribed to by devs.AnythingOutstanding said:So does this mean that girls only care about Romance or something?
I always appreciate people of higher intelligence who can understand the underlying message and not take something like a topic title at face value. Thanks for defending the post.maninahat said:No. Can't you people fucking read? Half of this thread is of people assuming the OP was making a generalisation about all women, simply because he found romance to be a poorly attached aspect of gaming, and that is detrimental to the enjoyment of those who like games with a good romance (like his girlfriend). He never said that all girls must have romance in games. He just pointed out that it is a large part of the market that is being unsubscribed to by devs.
And he is right. Think about it: we have both action movies and romantic movies. Same with books. Same with plays. Same with practically every other medium other than games. AAA Games are almost invariably about killing something. Will we ever see one where the emphasis is on love?
Try reading the OP before replying. The title is just an attention grabber. I clearly state that some girls like the same action games as guys, the entire point is that I know someone who is part of a group who are being completely ignored in the gaming community. All girls? No. But many. The success of romantic comedies and romance novels attests to the interest there is in that theme. I also said that I like romances in most of my favorite novels, so don't start going off on me about pidgeon holing guys as well.Mark Hardigan said:Your girlfriend likes romance, and she's a girl... therefore all girls like romance? You need to rework your logic. I am a guy. I prefer RPGs over FPS. Therefore, all men prefer RPGs over FPS. I am a guy, and I am allergic to milk. Therefore, all men are allergic to milk. See how faulty this logic is?
I agree that many games are disregarding the female audience, but it is not because they don't have romance. That's like saying that all games are disregarding everyone who likes portal because not every single game has cake.
Which one?? If you mean the generalization that "all girls want romance" then that's you making the generalization. Let me quote myself:CarlMinez said:All generalizations are wrong. Including this one.
Hi, welcome to the Escapist forums!digitelanimefan said:snip
No no, see it's a paradox.Wolfram01 said:Which one?? If you mean the generalization that "all girls want romance" then that's you making the generalization. Let me quote myself:CarlMinez said:All generalizations are wrong. Including this one.
"Please keep in mind I'm not saying girls can't like that, and I really wish my gf was one of those who can enjoy a game for the simple fun of exploration and blowing stuff up, but she's not like that. And I'm sure she's not alone, not by a long shot."
Ah... well then.CarlMinez said:No no, see it's a paradox.Wolfram01 said:Which one?? If you mean the generalization that "all girls want romance" then that's you making the generalization. Let me quote myself:CarlMinez said:All generalizations are wrong. Including this one.
"Please keep in mind I'm not saying girls can't like that, and I really wish my gf was one of those who can enjoy a game for the simple fun of exploration and blowing stuff up, but she's not like that. And I'm sure she's not alone, not by a long shot."
I stated that all generalizations are false, thus making a generalization which in itself must also be false. I meant this generalization i did just now when saying that all generalizations are false.
I don't think you made any generalizations. It's just that I read some comments talking about generalizations so I just wanted to post something witty - though not in anyway relevant to your OP.Wolfram01 said:Ah... well then.CarlMinez said:No no, see it's a paradox.Wolfram01 said:Which one?? If you mean the generalization that "all girls want romance" then that's you making the generalization. Let me quote myself:CarlMinez said:All generalizations are wrong. Including this one.
"Please keep in mind I'm not saying girls can't like that, and I really wish my gf was one of those who can enjoy a game for the simple fun of exploration and blowing stuff up, but she's not like that. And I'm sure she's not alone, not by a long shot."
I stated that all generalizations are false, thus making a generalization which in itself must also be false. I meant this generalization i did just now when saying that all generalizations are false.
But why bring it up at all? I was hoping to avoid any brash generalizations in the OP, particularily with the little quote I replied with previously.