High five!Guy Jackson said:What makes me laugh is that so many people are so obsessed with getting second place!
<<< PC Gamer
XD
Edit:
Damn, ninja'd (sort of) by TerranReaper.
Because i can relate.
High five!Guy Jackson said:What makes me laugh is that so many people are so obsessed with getting second place!
<<< PC Gamer
XD
Edit:
Damn, ninja'd (sort of) by TerranReaper.
You have just won this thread.theonlyblaze2 said:Does it really matter this much? I have a 360 and it is the shit. My cousin has a PS3 and it is the shit. They are both great gaming consoles. Now what we should be talking about is how terrible the Wii is.
The singular chip is more poweful yes, but PS3 packs more of them so it brings more horsepower to the table.MaxP779 said:The 360 has the more powerful graphics chip therefore it usually has the "better graphics" however the difference is minimal and generally isn't noticeable unless you study screenshots or something.
you DO know the "console wars" are basicly flame wars that have stuff like this:"(WII/PS3/360) IZ TEH BEST AND (WII/PS3/360) IZ TEH SUCK" right?Aby_Z said:Opinions. Everyone has them. It's really that simple.
Just putting it out there, but the Wii has some fine first party games that succeed based on their own merits. Like Monster Hunter 3, a fantastic game that Nintendo had seemingly stolen directly off the (figurative) plates of PS3 owners. Heck, Monster Hunter 3 proved that using friend codes for online was purely optional.Kagim said:"Why does it matter Faceless Mister Kagim thinks the Wii is only good for Super nintendo and N64 games?"
As someone said before these aren't a "console war". It's the fanboy war. And I think both sides are .. mentally-slower than what could be considered average.Karvas said:War...war never changes
So in the knowledge that this probably wont convert anyone.
I really don't see the point of he console wars. People go out of their way to defend their console, while it should be the companies that should be bending over backwards to make sure you keep paying for their product.
Instead of defending the xbox people should be whining to Microsoft for some of the cool stuff the PS3 has. vice versa.
I personally believe the console wars are pretty healthy really. Has anyone got harmed by it? no.BOBdotEXE said:Every single time COD make a report about their mapPacks coming out first on the xbox360, or Gameplay footage shows xbox game-play instead of PS3, instantly that video gets flooded with responses about why (****) is the best console, and the other is junk! and all that!
What I want to know is why so every one get so upset?
Both the Xbox 360 and PS3 are good console, both have good points, and bad;
saying one is complete junk just because it dose not have support X, or Play X, dose that make it junk? No, that makes it Not For You!
and then their are those people who say "well, I have both and the (*****) is defiantly better!"
Good for you! You bought two consoles and Like one better.
Personally for me I got an xbox360, because my friends had it, and I wanted to Play online with them, (and also for halo, until I actually played it, and now regret buying it)
I mean think about it, they both have different things goo about them, they are setup for different people!
it would be better if at least they could come up with better arguments..
Anti-Xbox
-no blueRay
-$$$ for online
-only FPS games
-RROD
-bad graphics
Anti-PS3
-no good games (just writing what I hear.)
-terrible online play
-no party system
-took out "other OS"
how ever they both have some other nice features, like the PS3 Web browser, or Xbox's ability to Save Games to the Harddrive (or boot from Flash drive/memory card)
The main Question is why the big fuss? it's just a game(console)!