M Night Shyamalan booed by NYC audience... though I'm not sure why?

Recommended Videos

Mr. Grey

I changed my face, ya like it?
Aug 31, 2009
1,616
0
0
So M. Night Shyamalan isn't directing or writing it? But people from two movies I absolutely could not enjoy, are? Specifically Quarantine and 30 Days of Night. I didn't like the direction of the Quarantine... the writing didn't help any either. Which brings up that I immensely disliked the writing of 30 Days of Night as well. Yet we have the direction of the Quarantine and the writing of 30 Days of Night in the case of Devil.

No wonder I found this trailer funny, looks like I made the right call for myself.
 

allyhewitt

New member
Jun 15, 2009
90
0
0
good, i'm glad this happened. well done new tork! it makes cinema bosses realise that we have the power and we have a voice
 

inFAMOUSCowZ

New member
Jul 12, 2010
1,586
0
0
its M night, while i enjoy all his stuff from sixth sense. To the crappy Avatar movie. You just need to accepet his movies for what ther are.
 

AgDr_ODST

Cortana's guardian
Oct 22, 2009
9,317
0
0
I had the misfortune of having to suffer through his unintentional comedy that was The Happening and his mauling of The Last Airbender. I personally for those very good reaons say Fuck you M. Night and the high horse you rode in on. I hope a mob of people that hate his shitty recent efforts as much as I did murder him
 

BlumiereBleck

New member
Dec 11, 2008
5,402
0
0
MiracleOfSound said:
tomtom94 said:
I guess people have decided that his movies just...suck.
Huh... I quite enjoyed his movies, though I only saw Sixth Sense, the Village and Unbreakable.
He pissed way to many people off with the last airbender
 

AugustFall

New member
May 5, 2009
1,110
0
0
Did you see The Last Airbender? None of his fans think his newer films hold up against the ones that made him famous.
 

Harkonnen64

New member
Jul 14, 2010
559
0
0
ProfessorLayton said:
Ever since the Happening, people have turned against him. The movie didn't look too bad, though the acting wasn't great. People are jerks though and most likely won't even give him a chance anymore.
We gave him a chance, then he made the Last Airbender...
 

RanD00M

New member
Oct 26, 2008
6,947
0
0
I thought that that trailer was nice.I'm kinda...Excited for this movie now.Even if this is the first time that I hear about it.

And that old lady is totally the Devil.
 

reg42

New member
Mar 18, 2009
5,390
0
0
Well it looks alright, although I predict a stupid plot twist.

I'm guessing they were laughing because he's turned himself into a joke.
 

Crowghast

New member
Aug 29, 2008
863
0
0
It's just a plain stupid idea. You can hear the announcer guy struggling to sound foreboding while describing what is happening.

[i\]"What happens when you're stuck in an elevator? And one of you is [b\]DEE DEBBIL?[/b] From the mind of M. Night Shyamalan."[/i]

Seriously? The devil is in an elevator? The ENTIRE movie will surround the events of a couple jackasses in an enclosed space? The line "Someone turn on the liiiiiiiiiiightsararar-" whilst in an elevator can only be answered with pointing your finger at the screen and jeering loudly.

Shyamalan's a horrible writer. He isn't a bad director, he just has really terrible ideas for what to direct in his movies. And now he [i\]isn't even directing it[/i].
 

WorldCritic

New member
Apr 13, 2009
3,021
0
0
So five people get stuck in an elevator and one of them supposedly begins to attack the others. Sounds like a hilariously boring movie and I would laugh even if it did sound good because it's M. Night Shyamalan.
 

Crowghast

New member
Aug 29, 2008
863
0
0
Kakkoi said:
I don't get it either, I -like- most of his movies. I've seen all of them and the only one's I didn't like were The Last Airbender and the Happening. I really think people make fun of him because it's the -in- thing to do. And I don't think the 3 strikes your out thing is a good excuse, how about Tim Burton? Steven Spielberg? No, people mock him because if a critic says his movie sucks then it must be so.

EDIT: I just read the article, he didn't write or direct it but it was his idea apparently.
Spielberg and Burton have made their fair share of box-office bombs, but they've got many, many more movies to show their success. Whenever they bombed, they were able to follow-up with better movies. Spielberg has been involved with over 100 movies, some good some bad. Burton has been involved with at least 16 films that I know of.

Shyamalan has very few under his belt, only 9 films. Two of those movies almost no-one has ever heard of and likely will never watch: [i\]Praying With Anger (1992)[/i] and [i\]Wide Awake (1998)[/i] gained him practically no rception at all. [i\]Sixth Sense[/i] was groundbreaking in the film industry, was a humongous success, and gained him great praise, both critically and popularly. It is still his best, and strongest work. [i\]Unbreakable[/i] followed and, although not as successful, was still a strong film. What I considered, personally, to be an excellent follow-up.

But after that, he followed Unbreakable with movies that were just plain mediocre. Not bad, just... not good.

There was [i\]Signs[/i], which was pretty dumb now that I think about it, but sort of okay. Then [i\]The Village[/i], which was also dumb thinking back on it, but also pretty okay.

And what's left? [i\]Lady in the Water[/i], [i\]The Happening[/i], and [i\]The Last Airbender[/i]. NOT good follow-ups to a couple mediocre films. It's like a domino effect, except that as the dominos knock eachother over, they keep getting worse and worse. And the problem that sets him apart from Spielberg and Burton? [i\]He still hasn't made a good movie yet.[/i]

Nothing will allow "Devil" to succeed in bringing Shyamalan out of his rut short of magical wizard power/three genie wishes/Divine intervention.
 

Treeinthewoods

New member
May 14, 2010
1,228
0
0
I boo him whenever I can simply because I have not forgiven him for The Village. He made that movie, he should have to pay the price for the rest of his life.

He should take on a partner for his next movie, I have a suggestion...

Uwe and M. Night present PONG! (The Movie). What a twist!
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,909
0
0
MiracleOfSound said:
Therumancer said:
I think he irritated a lot of people with some of his plot twists, not to mention the fact that some of his best work is routinely ruined by massively ridiculous moments other than the plot twists. Even "Signs" which had mixed, but general positive reviews, featured this ridiculous bit with one of these horrible alien invaders being defeated in the climactic momenet by a hick with a baseball bat... despite having somehow been a global threat.
Not to mention the plot hole of an Alien species advanced enough for intergalactic travel yet is dumb enough to invade a planet whose surface is almost entirely made up of the one thing they're allergic to
That bit doesn't especially bother me. On the flip side there is plenty of fiction about humans working to colonize incredibly hostile enviroments with dangerous natives for one reason or another. This is more or less the premise of Avatar, though it's sort of explained that it's due to seeking a nessicary mineral (though why it's so nessicary and valuable is not explained in detail, and the big problem I have there). "Signs" didn't really explore the motivations of the Aliens in much detail, choosing to leave them mysterious, but I could think of tons of reasons why they might choose to invade an enviroment that hostile to them, especially if they could somehow terraform.

I can even get into the idea of a species with intergalactic travel not being all that tough in combat. I mean science is not a linear thing, and a lot of discoveries are made as accidents while pursueing other things. What's more what people decide to research is based on the imagination. We discovered tons of things we could do with lasers that were never conceived of until we found them while trying to make the "laser gun" a reality even though the basic idea is impractical as there are more efficient ways of putting holes in things. Intergalactic travel could be discovered as a byproduct of some other area of research, or perhaps from a resources on an alien homeworld that doesn't have an Earth equivilent. Let's say a species found space travel based on something similar to the old Space 1889 game where they used "Liftwood" and propelled off of some alternate dimension like "ether" that they discovered that humans never found because we long ago became disenchanted with bothering to try and find ways to do something like that. They have space craft, perhaps even faster ones than the RPG (which was mostly in solar system) however when they get here they would be using weapons technology over a century out of date, and their technology would require an engagement doctrine which would put them into direct conflict with far superior weapons: like Jets firing missles. There have been numerous science fiction concepts that have explored ideas like this, and done so in a satisfactory enough fashion where I do not nessicarly agree that a species with intergalactic travel is by definition going to be vastly superior in all aspects to one that has not discovered it.

I can even deal with the concept of aliens being rather wimpy in all respects compared to humans. Series like Alan Dean Foster's "The Damned" and David Drake/David Weber's "Ranks Of Bronze", and "The Excalibur Option" (I think I have the latter title right) explored this concept. Rather than humanity's romance with the superhuman being true, aliens turn out to be much more fragile than we are, think slower on average, and don't have any kind of mind blowing psionic powers or anything. They have however been around longer and had more time to develop their tech so they have that edge, but wind up needing humanity becaus of our inherant abillities, while also being scared of them as well as the explosive rate at which we are innovating (or whatever).

The thing is that "Signs" was nothing that deep or well thought out. The Aliens show up and despite these mysterious warnings from wherever (I don't think that bit was ever really explained adequetly) we aren't prepared since we didn't take it seriously. These aliens are apparently strong enough where they are able to terrorize the entire population, the military did okay if I remember correctly, but wasn't exactly able to drive them off. They eventually wound up losing in a variation of "War Of The Worlds" because the enviroment is simply a lot more hostile than they expected (and I mean, I can deal with that explanation, plenty of good science fiction has dealt with humans having the same problem and having to back off and come back better prepared). The big issue is that with all of the damage these aliens were doing globally, they can't deal with hicks using strategies like "we're going to hide in the basement, lock the door, and plug up the cracks Nyah, nyah, nyah", and some dude is going to beat one of these things which is presumably a warrior on the vanguard of what was a fairly successful invasion using an improvised club. I mean even winning a fight with an alien using a club is fine, but he wasn't exactly some he-man, or action hero or something, he was a bloody hick... it wasn't even especially epic, I mean when you get down to it, it was kind of sad. If these guys blew chips that bad, how did they ever get that far? I mean I know the alien got chopped with a knife before that, but even that was in the catagory of "WTF" given that it was in the process of failing to deal with a bunch of civilians hiding in a perfectly normal house. The army, or heck even the police, should have made complete mince meat out of these dudes going by what we saw. They were just that pathetic.
 

DigitalSushi

a gallardo? fine, I'll take it.
Dec 24, 2008
5,718
0
0
Therumancer said:
These aliens are apparently strong enough where they are able to terrorize the entire population, the military did okay if I remember correctly, but wasn't exactly able to drive them off. They eventually wound up losing in a variation of "War Of The Worlds" because the enviroment is simply a lot more hostile than they expected (and I mean, I can deal with that explanation, plenty of good science fiction has dealt with humans having the same problem and having to back off and come back better prepared). The big issue is that with all of the damage these aliens were doing globally, they can't deal with hicks using strategies like "we're going to hide in the basement, lock the door, and plug up the cracks Nyah, nyah, nyah", and some dude is going to beat one of these things which is presumably a warrior on the vanguard of what was a fairly successful invasion using an improvised club. I mean even winning a fight with an alien using a club is fine, but he wasn't exactly some he-man, or action hero or something, he was a bloody hick... it wasn't even especially epic, I mean when you get down to it, it was kind of sad. If these guys blew chips that bad, how did they ever get that far? I mean I know the alien got chopped with a knife before that, but even that was in the catagory of "WTF" given that it was in the process of failing to deal with a bunch of civilians hiding in a perfectly normal house. The army, or heck even the police, should have made complete mince meat out of these dudes going by what we saw. They were just that pathetic.
The point of Signs was that it was an ordinary family trying to survive against all odds, I don't mean survive an alien attack, I mean survive something foreign and attacking the normal "American" architype family.

The family started out perfect, the father was a man of god, the mother was merely their as all mothers were and the children were protected by a bad ass uncle/godfather figure, all that goes to shit before the movie starts and thats a huge point in the movie, the aliens are the backdrop, the broken family is the actual story;
The uncle that supports superstition ( a real bad ass uncle protects his nieces and nephews and doesn't fuel their nightmares)
The father that has lost his way
The mother that isn't there.

Its about the family, its why the children are such a huge part of the film right until Uncle is a bad ass again and beats down the much better equiped Alien.

They were fighting not being a perfect family that couldn't hold together, the Aliens are merely a subtext to that, still its funny film.
 

dalek sec

Leader of the Cult of Skaro
Jul 20, 2008
10,237
0
0
Skullkid4187 said:
MiracleOfSound said:
tomtom94 said:
I guess people have decided that his movies just...suck.
Huh... I quite enjoyed his movies, though I only saw Sixth Sense, the Village and Unbreakable.
He pissed way to many people off with the last airbender
I think this is why he was booed, he really pissed off the fans of the series and alot of them must be smarting from it. From what I heard he pretty much threw out the cannon bits of the story out the window and messed around with pretty much everything.
 

Boba Frag

New member
Dec 11, 2009
1,288
0
0
Real shame- he over extended himself with big budget movies when he was far better suited to intense, slow burning dramas with those twists...

Quite frankly, I'm not surprised people perceive him as a bit of a joke.

Still, it's not over till it's over. He'll find some way to re-focus his ambitions.
 

Flee the Cities

New member
Apr 14, 2010
83
0
0
He is a bad director! "ALIENS COME TO CONQUER THE PLANET COMPOSED OF 70% OF THE THING THAT KILLS THEM. THEY CAN LEAP OVER BUILDINGS BUT CANT KICK DOWN A FUCKING BASEMENT DOOR. MEL GIBSON." -m. night shamlaynafa, 2002
 
Apr 19, 2010
1,544
0
0
dathwampeer said:
You know what's funny. Years ago when I was saying this douche was a hack everyone was like.

'ohh nooo. he's like a superamazingvisionaryofthefuturehaven'tuliekseensixthseseandallthatcozheislikeamazinganduberliknootherdirecter'.

Now like what 6-7 years down the line everyone's just catching up going...

'mmmyea, you were kinda rite there Jonny.'.

He was a hack from day one he's a hack now. Although horribly choreographed advert aside that might be his best (whatever passes for a film for him) film since 'unbreakable.' Which was his only watchable film.
People do have their own opinions, maybe they liked his earlier movies. That doesn't mean now that hes fallen you can just say that they were all wrong to like those movies.