Marriage without sex?
- Thread starter Oneirius
- Start date
Recommended Videos
I wonder how many heterosexual people have tried out gay sex before deciding it's not for them.JUMBO PALACE said:
I assume it's one of those things you know with yourself. If you don't feel any attraction towards either gender, you're probably asexual. No need to force yourself to try sex in case you aren't.
Hell no that's retarded.
She's beautiful? What's the point of that? Physical attraction might as well be a negative in a scenario with no sex.
She's talented amazing and kind? So are a lot of people in this world.
She loves me and would do anything for me? But no sex?
There's absolutely no possibility of swinging?
Seriously though, I would never get married even if the choice was marriage or death. Situation avoided. If she honestly thinks marriage is that important she's not right for me.
She's beautiful? What's the point of that? Physical attraction might as well be a negative in a scenario with no sex.
She's talented amazing and kind? So are a lot of people in this world.
She loves me and would do anything for me? But no sex?
There's absolutely no possibility of swinging?
Seriously though, I would never get married even if the choice was marriage or death. Situation avoided. If she honestly thinks marriage is that important she's not right for me.
actually, if she's been through sexual trauma, this is entirely possible. happens all the time. and there's often not a direct cure-the best i've heard of is surgery to cut off certain nerve signals or kegel exercises, and even those aren't always effective.Canid117 said:
OP: sadly, i go through times when i am unable to have sex, but my partner sticks with me anyway. i doubt he would do so if it was permanent, but we'll see how long this one lasts. >.<
Lilani said:
That video was really lovely. Thanks for that.
Personally, I would have no issues with this because, as someone else said, there are alternatives. You don't have to cheat on them, and they could still participate if it didn't seem too awkward, depending on what you did. But, good relationships are about more than just sex. There's a deep connection involved, and from what the original poster described, you'd have found that in this person. For me, anyway, finding and retaining that deep connection would mean a lot more than someone to sex me up on occasion.
Me either. But, I wouldn't be against staying friends with the individual in question.FamoFunk said:
This reminded me of the series Pushing Daisies. I have only seen a few episodes but basically it's about a guy who can't touch his girlfriend because she will die if he touches her. They can't even kiss or hold hands, it's kinda sad really.
I can't really see how it would work out :/ Sex isn't the most important thing in a relationship but it's still a big part.
I can't really see how it would work out :/ Sex isn't the most important thing in a relationship but it's still a big part.
I would first see how the relationship went for quite a while, and see how well the alternatives worked, and think long and hard about adopting a child too, I would have to take it from there after much introspection and so on. My gut feeling though is that in such a situation, yes would be the answer.
Shouldn't have added that part.Oneirius said:
Many people almost prefer oral to the real thing. I know I do.
Changes the question from a huge dilemma to a piss easy choice for me.
Its the only real benefit for a man to enter a marriage. Its the way the world works.
A comedian (I think Tim Allen) said.. In life if your a woman you have the choice of to go to school, or to get a job, or have kids, Become a housewife and not work at all, or any combination there in. Men, have two choices. Go to work or go to jail. So given that men inevitably will end up having to take care of the responsibilities of their existence, because society demands it, then theres not a lot of things left in a relationship that a woman will do, that a man wont be expected to do anyway.
Now that was a sweeping generalization, without question. But I think you can see why this question really depends on what side your on. If you have options, it might not be as important to you. If you dont have options, its usually the only thing left that you cant (exactly) do for yourself.
So knowing it going into a relationship. No... I wouldnt. However all too often even the best relationships can degrade down to a sexless relationship over a long period of time. That makes the argument of "should I stay or should I go?" a more difficult one.
Now... as for what was said in the OP... The mention of oral gratification. In most ways thats more than a fair compromise. However, I am thinking if a person was not physically capable of having sex, then other forms of gratis would likely be just as limited.
A comedian (I think Tim Allen) said.. In life if your a woman you have the choice of to go to school, or to get a job, or have kids, Become a housewife and not work at all, or any combination there in. Men, have two choices. Go to work or go to jail. So given that men inevitably will end up having to take care of the responsibilities of their existence, because society demands it, then theres not a lot of things left in a relationship that a woman will do, that a man wont be expected to do anyway.
Now that was a sweeping generalization, without question. But I think you can see why this question really depends on what side your on. If you have options, it might not be as important to you. If you dont have options, its usually the only thing left that you cant (exactly) do for yourself.
So knowing it going into a relationship. No... I wouldnt. However all too often even the best relationships can degrade down to a sexless relationship over a long period of time. That makes the argument of "should I stay or should I go?" a more difficult one.
Now... as for what was said in the OP... The mention of oral gratification. In most ways thats more than a fair compromise. However, I am thinking if a person was not physically capable of having sex, then other forms of gratis would likely be just as limited.
Pretty much, yeah.Erana said:
It's cool when I can just quote and agree. My head hurts too much to words make.
She can give oral, but she can't receive. I mean, I guess you could lick her malformed, partly developed "genitals" if you wanted (and if you could stand the sight, which was frankly hideous), but she wouldn't orgasm from it. Do you really want to have a completely one sided, degrading sexual relationship with the woman you love?RazgrizInferno said:
WOW, Just Wow. that was a really great story to listen to, seems like I just found out how I want to live my life :'). Good to see youtube has other stuff than people making an ass out of themselves.Lilani said:
As if sex would get in the way of something like that.
You would be a fool to turn down a life partner like that.
You would be a fool to turn down a life partner like that.