Mentally Ill Teenage Girl Dies From Suffocation During Exorcism

Recommended Videos

Cavouku

New member
Mar 14, 2008
1,122
0
0
I'm willing to believe in demons, and possession. But it's not the first conclusion I'd ever draw. In any situation. Ever. Even if I did in fact believe that was the situation, off the bat, I would find it better to act under the assumption it is not. Because what you believe isn't the problem, it's what you do.

And drowning a girl because she's not particularly normal, or acting off, is not acting with logical forethought.

...Also, is this a real exorcism method? I don't know much... or rather, anything, about exorcisms, but that just seems counter-productive to saving the possessed.
 

Wintermoot

New member
Aug 20, 2009
6,563
0
0
it happens to often.
REAL exorcisms are conducted and approved for by the church and done in such a way that the victim isn't harmed also before ANYTHING is done they check for stuff like mental or neurological disorders which is something that should be done before even considering preforming rituals like this. (for the record I,m a anti-theist and think that the whole idea of exorcism is a crock of shit)
 

The Rainmaker

New member
Jun 21, 2009
172
0
0
Finally found my sad and fucked up story of the day. Honestly though, this is just depressing. Also feel sorta sorry for the stupid dad. I mean, I doubt he feels good about killing his child. Suppose he should have thought of that before he forced her head underwater though...
 

AdamRBi

New member
Feb 7, 2010
528
0
0
The Demon won guys; the exorcism was a botched version of a wishing ritual. The demon wished for the child to die and to make the parents suffer.

Or there are just idiots in the world that figured drowning their child to the edge of death would cure mental illness. Especially since... Kumamoto Prefectural Police said the teenager died of suffocation and that she had undergone the ritual a hundred times before.... it didn't work the first 100 times.
 

lleihsad

New member
Apr 9, 2009
243
0
0
My favorite part is what the sect in question's rep had to say about it. Basically: "You were doing it wrong." Apparently, you're not supposed to bind the subject and hold them under the water - that's just waterboarding.

I normally have a reserved seat on the bandwagon for slamming irresponsible magicians, but this frankly seems more like a tragic failure to read the damned manual.
 

funguy2121

New member
Oct 20, 2009
3,407
0
0
Project_Omega said:
Exorcism is real, but it can be hard from distincting a demonic possession from mental illness sometimes. We are only human after all.
The girl is dead. She isn't anything now. "Only human" doesn't begin to cover it. I agree, exorcism is real. It's a real practice of antiquated, obsolete ideals to solve ever-evolving problems. It doesn't work, and it does very real harm, as evidenced by this story.

I will tell you how to distinguish between demon possession and mental illness. Is the person in question a tangible person sitting in front of you, or a character on the television? If it's the former, then you've got yourself a case of mental illness.
 

omegawyrm

New member
Nov 23, 2009
322
0
0
Sneaky-Pie said:
1. Slams against religion.
2. Rebuttals for religion.
3. Repeat steps 1 and 2.
4. Continuously repeat step 3.
5. Realize no one is going to change their opinion.
6. Remove yourself from the situation and thread.

Good talk, everyone.
So an argument is started when one group kills a little girl but they still get to be considered evenly? Man, wish I had enough faith to totally ignore reality and moral behavior like that.
 

Gudrests

New member
Mar 29, 2010
1,204
0
0
DJDarque said:
I didn't realize exorcisms still happened nowadays. I thought people were smarter than that.
....that didnt sound like an exorcism...that sounded like water boarding someone..
 

Shakomaru

New member
May 18, 2011
834
0
0
Isn't this basically waterboarding? and were they trying to kill her, or were they really trying to help?
 

Agayek

Ravenous Gormandizer
Oct 23, 2008
5,178
0
0
thongurf said:
BEST. IMAGE. EVER.
(that does not have tits in it)
It really is. If I ever find the guy who made it, I'll have to buy them a beer.
 

Dandark

New member
Sep 2, 2011
1,706
0
0
Why can people who are not religious stop bashing it with the most stupid arguments they could ever think of. We get it, you think it's a load of nonsense. Once your done telling everyone else how smart you are and how dumb they are for believing in religion then maybe you can start to see why some people believe in it.
 

Moosejaw

New member
Oct 11, 2010
127
0
0
People stand by and let others die for all sorts of reasons, none of them any better than the last. The drug war enriching violent cartels in Mexico, for instance, to whom the ATF then sells a ton of firearms so they can 'track' them and then forgetting to bother with the tracking...all because people are horrified that their kids will smoke marijuana (then they do it anyway). But who cares, those who die as a consequence are just brown people, right?

Religion or not, reckless stupidity will still exist in the same proportions.
 

Estelindis

Senior Member
Jan 25, 2008
217
0
21
Jonluw said:
Estelindis said:
While you are entitled to your opinion, I question the practicality and morality of what you suggest. To "do away" with something does not mean to simply let it die out, but to actively exterminate it. I assume you're aware that this breach of human rights would be actively opposed by many, including a significant number of atheists and agnostics who believe in the right of every human being to follow their own path?
You wouldn't have to do away with it forcefully. I'm not insinuating we should lead some agressive campaign against all religion.
One way would be to encourage critical thinking and rationality. Wait, why aren't we doing that already?

Causing a shift in society to stick to facts and well proven theories when anything important is concerned needn't be done through methods which infringe on human rights.
There's a certain lack of openness to some other points of view in your words of which you may not be aware. I am a Christian and I do my best to think critically and rationally. Many other Christians do too. We would certainly want to encourage using one's mind to its full potential; it is, after all, a gift from God. I'm sure many people of other faiths have similar feelings. After all, many great logical thinkers throughout the ages have had strong religious faith. Accordingly, I firmly disagree that that encouraging critical thinking would automatically lead to a decline in the love and worship of God or the divine (or however one's particular faith would put it).

In fact, nothing less than breaching my human rights could convince me to give up my faith. I certainly hope that even that wouldn't make me recant, but it's difficult to know how one would hold up under serious persecution, pain, or the threat of death unless one actually experiences something like that, and we're not always as brave as we'd wish to be. So yes: if you wanted to eliminate my faith, for instance, breaching my rights would be required.

However, I don't get the impression that you have any such wishes. Either you didn't think that people like me might exist (maybe you still don't; "she hilariously thinks she tries to be rational!" you may laugh, if one could laugh such a mouthful), or you didn't follow your thought of getting rid of religion through to its logical conclusion. Or maybe you just meant that wrongful practices committed by religious people should cease, in which case I agree - though I apply it to everyone, not just religious people. ;-)

Criminal actions such as the one mention in the OP could be lessened by better education and more rational thinking (as could wrongful actions with all kinds of motives). I hope that does happen! But we are missing an important piece of the puzzle: love. Our fellow escapist was right to say that religion isn't just for academics to discuss. God wants us to use our minds, but He also wants us to use our hearts. We need not just a more rational world but also a kinder world. And, in some ways, we need to prefer love - certainly, in the face of the kind of utilitarianism some people would call rational (a rationality based only on numbers), we need to maintain that the few, the poor, and the weak should not be sacrificed for the many, the wealthy, and the strong. So perhaps, in this sense, religion is irrational: it values love, which cannot be measured by any scientific unit. Still, we all know what love is and how valuable it is (or we do if we haven't suffered awful abuse or emotional deprivation), so I like to think this is an irrationality that we share. :)
 

Chonodhoch

New member
Apr 8, 2009
10
0
0
thongurf said:
Agayek said:
I'll close with an image I find fairly well encapsulates my point:

BEST. IMAGE. EVER.
(that does not have tits in it)
Dear lord that image fails utterly.

Beyond the fact that throughout the dark ages much scientific development continued and where infact propogated by the Catholic Church by the fact THEY MADE EVERY COPY IN EUROPE BACK THEN. The massive gap was a result of uneducated peasents jumping to the conclusion that book learning was the cause of the black death. The best way to see this is by realising that Ireland was used by Catholic church as a storage block to maintain ANY form of knowlege INCLUDING so called heretical texts, which is why they still exist.

Thank you for modern science Roman Catholocism!

On topic. As the artical says it wasn't even an exorcism ritual.
Actual rituals for exercism tend to come in a number of forms all involving lighting candles and praying to [insert deity]. The lighter forms which are done first generally involve watching the "possesed" individuals reactions to this and other holy things. It is then up to the exorcist (a catholic only title technically) whether or not this person really is possesed and whether or not to continue. Which involves... more candles and praying, maybe some oily water sprinkled apout for effect. Tell me please where is the problem with this?

As a man who believes in things he cannot directly see such as gravity, time, the Big Bang, wind, vacuum, the nucleic model of the atom and of course the judeo/christian God it is entierly possable that people might come under the adverse effects of other none-veiwables.

Sorry about that but I needed to rant about something
 

Comando96

New member
May 26, 2009
637
0
0
Pat8u said:
wait a minute buddhists really thats something new never thought they were into that stuff...
Japanese Samurai were Buddhist.

...They killed people with their sharp swords :p