Modern Warfare 2 Trailer Criticized For "Going Too Far"

Recommended Videos

Sparrow

New member
Feb 22, 2009
6,848
0
0
HE Starwind said:
Some people just don't realise it's a GAME. It's not made by terrorists themselves is it?

Or is it? o_O
OH SHI-- *nuked*

Ahem. Anyway. Next thing you'll know "Video Games Directly Finance Terrorism" will be pasted across every newspaper in the world.
 

Jezzy54

New member
Oct 19, 2008
243
0
0
The objective is to fight the people who did that to the White House. Therefore, I don't see a problem.
 

gbemery

New member
Jun 27, 2009
907
0
0
RelexCryo said:
gbemery said:
Why don't religious groups stop trying to persuade society to their morals? In fact how about they stop reviewing anything mainstream out of their venue?
Why doesn't EVERY alarmist group on the face of the earth stop reviewing things they know nothing about? Why should just the religious groups stop?

Aethists in Communist China mass murdered innocent Buddhists because they had been brainwashed by Marxists into believing that religions like Buddhism simply enslaved the poor.

Aethists in Communist China had kids sent to camps designed to end their "addiction" to internet and games- and kids were literally beaten to death in these camps, even after the grous advertised that they did not use beatings. All because of anti-video game alarmism.

How about ALL ignorant alarmists just stop talking about stuff they know nothing about?
Couldn't agree more!
 

loremazd

New member
Dec 20, 2008
573
0
0
Anarchy In Detroit said:
Oh screw the Christian Shit Monitor.

Tell me oh noble Christians... why is it ok to blow up random Eastern Europeans, random Russians, random Middle Easterners, but not the White House? How many times have we seen the Eiffel Tower get asploded in movies? How many times have we seen Berlin in ruins, playing as Soviets (you know, the people who raped and murdered their way back across what the Nazis already had raped and murdered the hell out of)? GROW UP.

Personally the White House getting ruined makes me actually curious to play this. Defending the US against... someone? Fuck yeah sign me up! Now there's a fight I can actually get behind.
Tell me, oh self righteous poster... why is it ok to judge millions of people over some opinionated members? Perhaps that high horse of yours is tired of being beaten by now, it's been dead for awhile.
 

Triple G

New member
Sep 12, 2008
484
0
0
I like the scene where this guy gets shot down in front of The White House and then a Russian Mi-24 army helicopters comes into the shot xD
 

Zersy

New member
Nov 11, 2008
3,021
0
0
Either way if they do censor it....

Then they shall have to face a army far more deadly then the US military or Russian Spetnaz

They Shall have to face the Gamers !! The most Hardcore and brutal army in existance we have never lost and we shall always be victourious !

HOO RAH !
 

HE Starwind

New member
May 14, 2009
186
0
0
Sparrow said:
HE Starwind said:
Some people just don't realise it's a GAME. It's not made by terrorists themselves is it?

Or is it? o_O
OH SHI-- *nuked*

Ahem. Anyway. Next thing you'll know "Video Games Directly Finance Terrorism" will be pasted across every newspaper in the world.
You know... I will not be at all surprised.
 

Chipperz

New member
Apr 27, 2009
2,593
0
0
Jezzy54 said:
The objective is to fight the people who did that to the White House. Therefore, I don't see a problem.
Actually, I've been hearing rumours that you'll be the ones invading America. My guess is the "Soap" McTavish levels are leading a U.N. Task Force to take out the U.S. Senate after the nuclear bomb in Notiraq in the first game is blamed on them. And it will be awesome.

Xzi said:
Who cares what the christian science monitor has to say about anything? Firstly, they have both, "christian," and, "science" in their title, so any point they make is automatically moot. Second, I seriously doubt that they have ever given their seal of approval to any game rated above E.
I'm replying to you as a quintessential troll on this thread that can't see past an organisation that a single person who has these thoughts belong to; Fuck off, troll.
 

Amnestic

High Priest of Haruhi
Aug 22, 2008
8,946
0
0
Chipperz said:
Jezzy54 said:
The objective is to fight the people who did that to the White House. Therefore, I don't see a problem.
Actually, I've been hearing rumours that you'll be the ones invading America. My guess is the "Soap" McTavish levels are leading a U.N. Task Force to take out the U.S. Senate after the nuclear bomb in Notiraq in the first game is blamed on them. And it will be awesome.
In which case you could argue that this is the true expression (via the medium of dance video games) of the Second Amendment to remove a corrupt government that should no longer be supported.

/Or something.
 

lucaf

New member
Sep 26, 2009
108
0
0
Chipperz said:
Actually, I've been hearing rumours that you'll be the ones invading America. My guess is the "Soap" McTavish levels are leading a U.N. Task Force to take out the U.S. Senate after the nuclear bomb in Notiraq in the first game is blamed on them. And it will be awesome..
i doubt it, how is a mostly american playerbase supposed to relate to attacking DC. even as a non american i dont like that idea
 

Chipperz

New member
Apr 27, 2009
2,593
0
0
lucaf said:
Chipperz said:
Actually, I've been hearing rumours that you'll be the ones invading America. My guess is the "Soap" McTavish levels are leading a U.N. Task Force to take out the U.S. Senate after the nuclear bomb in Notiraq in the first game is blamed on them. And it will be awesome..
i doubt it, how is a mostly american playerbase supposed to relate to attacking DC. even as a non american i dont like that idea
Out of interest, why? It's no different from attacking Iraq or Russia. If the storyline works, then anywhere should be allowed to attack anywhere.
 

Xandre

New member
Jan 14, 2009
41
0
0
Oh, bloody f*ing hell it's PC again. For those who do not know, PC states that it's okay for one and not the other. In other words, segregationalist (can't remember how to spell that one...).

It's pathetic. The country of a dictator gets nuked, it's fine. America gets nuked, it's an outrage. Folks, either it's ALL okay or NONE OF IT is okay. One or the other, Christians. You should shut up now, preferably before you start digging the hole (or putting up the cross). If you're not comfortable with seeing the destruction of a nation, we have a problem. It's a nuked city. It is a mass of concrete, steel, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc that has been blown up. STOP YOUR DAMN BITCHING and stay the hell away from me. I WILL NOT be held accountable for what happens. And the Christian Science Monitor? It's little better than the christians condeming Harry Potter for promoting Witchcraft. What God and Jesus did could be considered Witchcraft, no? Well, I think you hypercritical, hypocritical idiots have to shut up as well. Harry Potter is a fantasy book. COD6 is fantasy game. The only difference is in interaction levels. It might not happen. It's simply because it's hitting too close to home that it's not okay. Grow thicker skin, ignore it, just leave the game and its fans the hell ALONE. Just don't try and push your own opinions onto others. I've not read all of the comments. Just checked the first page. Let's see where my post leads...

And before anybody here complains about the third word in, it's censored. Deal with it.
 

willsham45

New member
Apr 14, 2009
1,130
0
0
I dont think it goes far enough i want to see the nation burn :p
But really I dont care seeing a city i have never been to go up in smoke, infact a city i do know like london going up in smoke would not effect me either...or come to think of that, i would not batter an eye lid if a game clearly depiced my own house with me burning inside as long as it was not actually happening.

Still back to the game i would love to be playing as the other faction distroying washington :p killing inersents and president blacky, bush or whoever is ment to be president at this time of the game
 

RedBaron19

New member
Oct 13, 2009
8
0
0
ssgt splatter said:
He's overreacting. Besides, if this game takes place in 2016 then we got a lot of time to live.
Really CSM, we don't have to worry at all. The world is going to end in 2012 anyway.......
 

Jezzy54

New member
Oct 19, 2008
243
0
0
Chipperz said:
Jezzy54 said:
The objective is to fight the people who did that to the White House. Therefore, I don't see a problem.
Actually, I've been hearing rumours that you'll be the ones invading America. My guess is the "Soap" McTavish levels are leading a U.N. Task Force to take out the U.S. Senate after the nuclear bomb in Notiraq in the first game is blamed on them. And it will be awesome.
The idea of Britain invading America is retarded. It's a diplomatic nightmare.
 

Mercsenary

New member
Oct 19, 2008
250
0
0
RedBaron19 said:
ssgt splatter said:
He's overreacting. Besides, if this game takes place in 2016 then we got a lot of time to live.
Really CSM, we don't have to worry at all. The world is going to end in 2012 anyway.......
Or that mayan astronomer decided to take a break and never got back to calculating the dates. XD

I'd say striking. I mean come on. Its a game, its supposed to entertain and tell a story. A story that has DC in ruins. I mean I'm quite sure there are plenty of stories and games where they show other countries' capitals ruined and burning. but DC? OH NOES. BAD GAME! BAD!
 

Chipperz

New member
Apr 27, 2009
2,593
0
0
Jezzy54 said:
Chipperz said:
Jezzy54 said:
The objective is to fight the people who did that to the White House. Therefore, I don't see a problem.
Actually, I've been hearing rumours that you'll be the ones invading America. My guess is the "Soap" McTavish levels are leading a U.N. Task Force to take out the U.S. Senate after the nuclear bomb in Notiraq in the first game is blamed on them. And it will be awesome.
The idea of Britain invading America is retarded. It's a diplomatic nightmare.
Didn't bother reading the rest of my post, huh?