MW2: BB chat reveals worse news

Recommended Videos

CWestfall

New member
Apr 16, 2009
229
0
0
Having disliked the Call of Duty series as early as CoD4, all I can really say is "I told you so."
 

Vault boy Eddie

New member
Feb 18, 2009
1,800
0
0
IW should make there next game on a console since they hate PCs so much, see how that works out for them. 9v9 on a P2P, that sounds like a big ole barrel of fail. Question to all who pre ordered and canceled, do youl ose the money you put in or do you get it back? Cause im thinking about just saying eff it and getting borderlands till a) the price goes down and b)they get there heads out there asses and patch in dedicated servers.
 

Avatar Roku

New member
Jul 9, 2008
6,169
0
0
Kalezian said:
orannis62 said:
3)Ah yes, the "You couldn't do better" argument, like I haven't heard this before. Yes yes, I couldn't do better, but I don't make games for a living. IW does, and should be able to tell from this massive uproar what people want.
Pingieking said:
1) Please tone down on the "Go make a game yourself if you think you can do better" argument. It's a flawed argument that barely even applies in this case. That's like saying "if you don't like you house, then go build your own". You've effectively told the vast majority of the consumer base to STFU and deal with a sub-par product. I know I can't do better, and I know that the majority of people complaining can't do better, but that's not the point. The point is that we know IW CAN DO BETTER! How do we know? Because they did do better with MW's multiplayer system! They've proven to all of us that they are clearly making something that has inferior multiplayer component compared to what they've made before. Why are we at fault for expecting IW to give us products that are at least on par with their previous titles in terms of quality and features? And why are we at fault for letting IW know that they've failed to meet our expectations?
ahh, yes, the old "I dont have to make games because thats not what I do for a living" argument, the only reason you dont is because your too lazy to do so. there is no exceptions.


also, I lol at all of the MW2 sucks people, simply because they seem to 'know' the game is going to be bad simply from what is said, and have not actually tried it.

I love how much people are saying that they are not going to buy the game, yet continue to bash the game developers decisions for the game, this in point; I will lol at all of them when the game is released and the multiplayer is actually good.

also, I have talked to some of my more 'hardcore' CoD friends, and they are still buying it in spite of the fact of what IW has put into the game, they also use the same reasoning as me, "One less squeaker".
Because we're lazy? Are you fucking kidding? So you go ahead and make a game then. Any game, even a flash game. I mean, if it's so easy, that should be no problem, right? We're waiting...

I'll address this second point, but are you getting the game for the PC (and therefore won't be able to find a lag free match), the 360 (and therefore can't use Party Chat), or the PS3 (and therefore won't have every gametype)? Knowing which will make it easier to argue.

You know what? I would have gotten it for the 360, and I have no doubt, even though I'm not getting it, that the Multiplayer will be phenomenal. That said, I'm not getting it, because IW is taking out something that makes up the core of my enjoyment for XBL in general, and that's a price I'm not willing to pay, even if the multiplayer is amazing.

Tell me, why are they hardcore? No lives, no friends (which makes sense actually, that would explain why, assuming you and they are getting the 360 version, that they don't care about party chat), delusions of grandeur...?

Sorry, but the whole "Hardcore" label really, really annoys me.
 

Vault boy Eddie

New member
Feb 18, 2009
1,800
0
0
DesertHawk said:
gamefreakbsp said:
On the other hand, welcome to the real world.
How so?
Eactly, I work my ass off to get the things i want, for people that get everything from mommy they have no other recourse than to take it up the pooper and go aboout there day. But when you actually take the money out of your pocket and give it to someone you expect a quality product in exchange for said money. These douches are going backwards instead of forward by taking out things that shouldnt even be tought of when youre thinking about changing something.

Ooo! the game looks spiffy! It's so awesome! These kids think there little dingaling grows a few inches by buying the game cause everyone else likes it. That's like buying a mustang in all its glory, and then since Ford knows that everyone loved it and will buy the next one, they go and drop a 4 banger in the engine bay and make the AC shoot out sulfur.
 

Pingieking

New member
Sep 19, 2009
1,362
0
0
Kalezian said:
Wait... what?
I'm lazy because I can't outperform perfessionals at their job? Do you expect me to outplay NBA players if my favorite team plays badly? Do you expect a soldier to get off his/her ass and design their own armoured car if their current one is not good enough? Do you want the average Joe to get off his ass and learn how to perform surgury if his doctor screwed up?

How about you make your own clothes so that the professionals don't have to meet your expectations. What? "I dont have to make clothes because thats not what I do for a living"? Well, if so you're just a lazy tard. (that was sarcasm for anyone who failed to notice)

The people at IW are professionals, and they get paid for being that. Why am I lazy if they don't perform up to professional standards? I don't see DICE excluding all these features from their shooters; why should I accept it from IW? I am complaining to IW because I want to support IW, and I want them to have my money instead of DICE. But having said that, I still have my standards, and IW gives me no choice but to give my money to DICE because they failed to meet my expectations while DICE has.

One reason I KNOW it will be bad is because the game has 9 vs 9 for EVERY multiplayer mode. THAT IS BAD! That is not acceptable multiplayer experience for the biggest game release of 2009. Hell, it's not acceptable for ANY 2009 FPS. 9 vs 9 is pathetic for PC FPS standards. This is the platform with the best online capabilities! This is the platform that run FPS with hundred of players at a time! The best IW can do is a feeble 18 players? Even most console FPS can top that.
 

DrunkWithPower

New member
Apr 17, 2009
1,380
0
0
Kalezian said:
I will be honest with anyone and eveyrone getting this game, I will hurt you if you spoil the story for me.
Everybody dies except for Matt Damon. Anywho, let me start by saying "haw haw". And I'll finish by saying "That's why I don't pre-order games, you basically get stuck with something you'll trade back in 5 days later.... like Madden 10".
 

Marowit

New member
Nov 7, 2006
1,271
0
0
9v9!??!?!

Holy game breaking batman!

That's just pathetic! I am sure the single player campaign is going to be great, but if it's as short as the last game how can they think it justifies $60!? I am so glad I've picked up DA:O and L4D2 with the money I was going to spend on this game (<3 steam). Now I'll get my epic single player, and have a slapstick, horrifying adventure with L4D2.

InfinityWard has just lost another longtime fan.
 

Avatar Roku

New member
Jul 9, 2008
6,169
0
0
Pingieking said:
Kalezian said:
Wait... what?
I'm lazy because I can't outperform perfessionals at their job? Do you expect me to outplay NBA players if my favorite team plays badly? Do you expect a soldier to get off his/her ass and design their own armoured car if their current one is not good enough? Do you want the average Joe to get off his ass and learn how to perform surgury if his doctor screwed up?

How about you make your own clothes so that the professionals don't have to meet your expectations. What? "I dont have to make clothes because thats not what I do for a living"? Well, if so you're just a lazy tard. (that was sarcasm for anyone who failed to notice)

The people at IW are professionals, and they get paid for being that. Why am I lazy if they don't perform up to professional standards? I don't see DICE excluding all these features from their shooters; why should I accept it from IW? I am complaining to IW because I want to support IW, and I want them to have my money instead of DICE. But having said that, I still have my standards, and IW gives me no choice but to give my money to DICE because they failed to meet my expectations while DICE has.

One reason I KNOW it will be bad is because the game has 9 vs 9 for EVERY multiplayer mode. THAT IS BAD! That is not acceptable multiplayer experience for the biggest game release of 2009. Hell, it's not acceptable for ANY 2009 FPS. 9 vs 9 is pathetic for PC FPS standards. This is the platform with the best online capabilities! This is the platform that run FPS with hundred of players at a time! The best IW can do is a feeble 18 players? Even most console FPS can top that.
You said it better than I could. Frankly, I tried for 10 minutes to think up a way to argue with his most recent post, but I couldn't because most points I was making seemed so fucking basic that I ended up feeling stupid for even having to make them.
 

Marowit

New member
Nov 7, 2006
1,271
0
0
Pingieking said:
Kalezian said:
Wait... what?
I'm lazy because I can't outperform perfessionals at their job? Do you expect me to outplay NBA players if my favorite team plays badly? Do you expect a soldier to get off his/her ass and design their own armoured car if their current one is not good enough? Do you want the average Joe to get off his ass and learn how to perform surgury if his doctor screwed up?

How about you make your own clothes so that the professionals don't have to meet your expectations. What? "I dont have to make clothes because thats not what I do for a living"? Well, if so you're just a lazy tard. (that was sarcasm for anyone who failed to notice)

The people at IW are professionals, and they get paid for being that. Why am I lazy if they don't perform up to professional standards? I don't see DICE excluding all these features from their shooters; why should I accept it from IW? I am complaining to IW because I want to support IW, and I want them to have my money instead of DICE. But having said that, I still have my standards, and IW gives me no choice but to give my money to DICE because they failed to meet my expectations while DICE has.

One reason I KNOW it will be bad is because the game has 9 vs 9 for EVERY multiplayer mode. THAT IS BAD! That is not acceptable multiplayer experience for the biggest game release of 2009. Hell, it's not acceptable for ANY 2009 FPS. 9 vs 9 is pathetic for PC FPS standards. This is the platform with the best online capabilities! This is the platform that run FPS with hundred of players at a time! The best IW can do is a feeble 18 players? Even most console FPS can top that.
well said.


9v9 - it's sad that IW took away the dedicated servers in order to make people have to buy their DLC for any new maps/mods, but even worse that 9v9 was their solution to enormous amounts of lag the IWnet 'solution' generates.
 

Ben7

New member
Apr 15, 2009
311
0
0
Man I love the stupidy of the Q&A session IW had:


Moriarte: Ignoring IW.net, is the PC version a direct port of the console version?

Mackey-IW: No, PC has custom stuff like mouse control, text chat in game, and graphics settings.
Wohoho, how will other developers cope with these advancements you've made?



DudezTY: Since we cannot kick people in ranked matches, how will we stop hackers who get past VAC?

Mackey-IW: Our goal is to ban hackers from the game.
.......
 

shadow skill

New member
Oct 12, 2007
2,850
0
0
9v9 wow there have been PS2 games with 32 players (It used real servers maintained by the developer rather than P2P.) 9v9 for a game like this is pretty weak for 2009 on the PC when it is somewhat routine to see 32 player multiplayer on consoles.
 

WickedSkin

New member
Feb 15, 2008
615
0
0
Kalezian said:
ahhh, I love all the bawww CoD6 is making people give, the tears, I love them.


if you dont like it, dont buy it and get on with your life, its only a game.

if you dont like it, keep playing CoD4, you know, the game that you want CoD6 to be?

if you dont like it, make a better game yourself, since obviously I-Dub doesn't know how to and you do.



take your pick of which comment you want, Im just making it standardized from now on since all of them are interchangeable with the current level of bawwww that fanboys are causing.

Apackof12Ninjas said:
canadamus_prime said:
So is anyone still going to buy this game? I'd be surprised if there is.
Yes I am, pre-order is paid off, gonna get it in 5 days. Im a bit excited ^_^

I will be honest with anyone and eveyrone getting this game, I will hurt you if you spoil the story for me.
People like you, people who just lies down and accept that they are being fucked over, are the very thing that is wrong with gaming today. Seriously you (and a lot of others like you) are pretty much responsible for this HUGE travesty.

Your list of choices is just worthless. Why? Because you have no clue whatsoever of what you are talking about.

We who are used to greatness will not settle for half-ish games. Most of us LOVED the CoD series. But now we got the finger and a big "FUCK YOU" from IW and Activision. They betrayed us. They are working against us in so many ways. They release a console game on PC. 9vs9? No mods? No proper servers? They pretty much took at least 4 years of game out of it. Then they expect us to pay MORE money?

We won't buy it. We have already stated that. But a lot of idiots will. What will that tell Activision and other companies? It's ok to release one forth of a game and charge more for it. So what will everyone else do from then on? Release 1/4 of games, charge more and drain your wallet silly with DLC. They are lowering the quality of their releases tremendously because some people will still throw cash at them like the little dogs they are.

Now figure out why your comments are worthless.

I'm sorry I'm just a little enraged.
 

WickedSkin

New member
Feb 15, 2008
615
0
0
Pingieking said:
Kalezian said:
Wait... what?
I'm lazy because I can't outperform perfessionals at their job? Do you expect me to outplay NBA players if my favorite team plays badly? Do you expect a soldier to get off his/her ass and design their own armoured car if their current one is not good enough? Do you want the average Joe to get off his ass and learn how to perform surgury if his doctor screwed up?

How about you make your own clothes so that the professionals don't have to meet your expectations. What? "I dont have to make clothes because thats not what I do for a living"? Well, if so you're just a lazy tard. (that was sarcasm for anyone who failed to notice)

The people at IW are professionals, and they get paid for being that. Why am I lazy if they don't perform up to professional standards? I don't see DICE excluding all these features from their shooters; why should I accept it from IW? I am complaining to IW because I want to support IW, and I want them to have my money instead of DICE. But having said that, I still have my standards, and IW gives me no choice but to give my money to DICE because they failed to meet my expectations while DICE has.

One reason I KNOW it will be bad is because the game has 9 vs 9 for EVERY multiplayer mode. THAT IS BAD! That is not acceptable multiplayer experience for the biggest game release of 2009. Hell, it's not acceptable for ANY 2009 FPS. 9 vs 9 is pathetic for PC FPS standards. This is the platform with the best online capabilities! This is the platform that run FPS with hundred of players at a time! The best IW can do is a feeble 18 players? Even most console FPS can top that.
I'm going to offer you sex for your brilliance... and you will accept.
 

Ivan Issaccs

New member
Oct 7, 2009
31
0
0
Frankly, I'm saddened by Infinity Wards decisions to gimp the PC version because of "piracy" (i.e. we're not worth the money it'd take to make a good version to them).
The hell? So to prevent more piracy they are going to reduce the multiplayer experience?
One of the only reasons a person would by a game rather than pirate it?
At this point I am presuming several managerial positions have been filled with burdens of the state...
 

Poomanchu745

New member
Sep 11, 2009
1,582
0
0
Chesterfield Snapdragon McFisticuffs said:
I know this sounds bad, but I really think that people in it for the Single Player especially should torrent this game. It is punishing Infinity Ward for what is Activision's decisions, but seriously, just go onto pirate bay or something and tell them that you're not prepared to pay for their bullshit.
Knowing IW they would probably plant the torrents online so they could track em to find out who was stealing their precious game just to be able to sue the shit out of every person that tried to torrent the game. I think IW was taken over by console frat boys and they are doing everything in their power to screw us PC gamers over.