Frozen Donkey Wheel2 said:
Eico said:
Frozen Donkey Wheel2 said:
Eico said:
65 deaths from a population of four and a half million is fairly minor indeed; that's 0.0014%.
So you're saying there's no middle ground between "business as usual" and "genocide"? OK, then.
Do tell me, with a quote, where I mentioned genocide.
I'm very curious.
Well, by bringing up the percentage of the total population, I thought you were implying that in order for the earthquake to be a big deal to you, it would have to put a dent in the total population.
So while you didn't bring up genocide, that's still pretty messed up. If that IS what you were implying.
I'm saying a natural event killing 65 people of four and a half million is nothing disastrous (/pun). With the amount of people who die every day from starvation alone severl hundred times larger than that number, I fail to see the noteworthiness of 0.0014%. Perhaps people are selfish and don't care that thousands die every day from dirty water and heat stroke. Heaven forbid, in the midst of the majority of the population below the poverty line, an earthquake should kill 0.0014% of a developed country's populas! I'd be surprised if the number of people who die from cancer in New Zealand every day isn't close to that number.
65 people dying isn't massive. Many, many, many, many more people die every day from everything BUT old age. It's simply that we don't see their faces. It's harder to ignore the faces of the people in a developed nation. It's okay not to care or talk about the people starving to death - 'they are far away, they don't have T.V's, I don't hear about them, so what can I do'? Almost racist, in an unintentional way, isn't it. Ha.