"No! Don't get the flag!" But, that's the objective, "NOOOOO!"
- Thread starter BloodyThoughts
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Well, i'd screw up his nuke and insult him verbally.
Also, i don't play objective games without voice chatting with atleast one person i know. You need some basic tactics for a good win, and tactics rarely happen with a team of randoms. Having someone to plant on B, while you plant on A in Demolition, cover you while you take point in Domination, escort you in CTF or S&D in a non-retarded and obvious manner, having a good, beneficial for the team killstreak setup and so on makes MW2 a lot less frustrating.
Also, i don't play objective games without voice chatting with atleast one person i know. You need some basic tactics for a good win, and tactics rarely happen with a team of randoms. Having someone to plant on B, while you plant on A in Demolition, cover you while you take point in Domination, escort you in CTF or S&D in a non-retarded and obvious manner, having a good, beneficial for the team killstreak setup and so on makes MW2 a lot less frustrating.
The reason it sucks is because it encourages people to camp the shit out of the game instead of playing for the objectives. Why bother capping flags when you have one player who just kill whores, get a chopper gunner and ends the fucking game.Kuchinawa212 said:
In case I wasn't clear enough:
FUCK the nuke. Right in its ear.
People just can't grab the concept of objective based games, I find this happens allot in MW2.
"Don't capture that flag you noob"
"Why did you plant that bomb?"
"OMG why did you do that i was two kills off a killstreak" (I had this shouted at me after winning the match almost single handedly)
I realy don't see why people play objective based matches when all they want is team death match. I very rarely play COD now and one of the reasons why is because of this (that and everyone with a mic seems to be about 10 years old).
Infact thats kinda why i started playing MAG, if you don't do the objectives in that then you loose horribly, no matter what you score is. Gives people that insentive to you know, play the game!
"Don't capture that flag you noob"
"Why did you plant that bomb?"
"OMG why did you do that i was two kills off a killstreak" (I had this shouted at me after winning the match almost single handedly)
I realy don't see why people play objective based matches when all they want is team death match. I very rarely play COD now and one of the reasons why is because of this (that and everyone with a mic seems to be about 10 years old).
Infact thats kinda why i started playing MAG, if you don't do the objectives in that then you loose horribly, no matter what you score is. Gives people that insentive to you know, play the game!
People don't generally rage after a nuke in MW2.JFuss said:
They just kind of sigh with dissapointment.
If you cant win doing that why on a weekends without fail do I get stuck on a team playing rush with 7 snipers and me?Irridium said:
Also I about a week ago I ran into a group of people just sitting at the m-com station arming and defusing the bomb for points, I promptly took out my piston and shot the guy from the other team in the head then got booted from the server, so it does happen in BC2 just not as much.
The problem with BFBC2 is that it is more rewarding to get kill streaks by just camping with a sniper, then actually going to blow up the objectives in rush or capturing the bases in CTF. You only get something like a 200 point bonus for winning a match which is easily outmatched by the points that can be racked up through kill streaks.
To those who play MW2 online, find a group of friends to play with, the game goes a lot smoother.
To those who play MW2 online, find a group of friends to play with, the game goes a lot smoother.
Brilliant justification of your point and such valuable addition to the topic!MirrorSweep said:
OT - I have stopped playing online multiplayer and this being one of the reasons. All of the good things in MW2's multiplayer was offset by bad things. Many really popular games without broken systems to abuse are ruined as when you get millions of people playing your chances of coming across an arsehole are increased, however good the game.
yup. i was playing rush on abd co.2 when some kid yelled NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!
i need 10 more kills to rank up n00b
*then i planted the bomb and won the game*
the kid yells:
N00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000B!!!!!!!!
then i see his score-1 kill 21 deaths score 50.
i need 10 more kills to rank up n00b
*then i planted the bomb and won the game*
the kid yells:
N00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000B!!!!!!!!
then i see his score-1 kill 21 deaths score 50.
Yep i second this, bring back the "player match" option so people can just play for fun and do the objectives and leave all the people who care so much about their pointless statistics more then having fun to be ass holes in ranked matches as was the case until COD4 MW came along decided to fuck it up for everyone by making its crappy everything has to be ranked and have some sort of point other then fun in multiplayer approach which now every game copies because MW is so popular and they want to be just like it when they grow up.....Davrel said:
j0z said:
i just snipe a few guys move up snipe move up plant objective morter strike win game rank up, rinse and repeat, only make more fun
This has happened to me but I notice this more in MW2 than in any other game really and it seems to be Infinity Ward's fault for making every game mode except S&D into a game of team death match, or camp long enough to get a nuke.
I play alot of Empires 2.24d (a Halflife 2-mod) and I only had one situation that roughly matches yours:
I was close to the enemy Commanders-Vehicle, I let my own Commander know that I can wall him in and blow him up in under 3 minutes.
He starts screaming(Cut-down version): "NO DONT DO IT IM ALMOST DONE RESEARCHING NUKES!"
I was like: "We don't need those if I'm already able to blow him up without the nukes..."
"NO DONT GET OUT OF THERE I WANT THE ENEMY COMPLETELY GONE!"
Roughly explained, he wanted to destroy all the enemy structures first before finishing off the Commander.
I disconnected out of pure facepalm.
I was close to the enemy Commanders-Vehicle, I let my own Commander know that I can wall him in and blow him up in under 3 minutes.
He starts screaming(Cut-down version): "NO DONT DO IT IM ALMOST DONE RESEARCHING NUKES!"
I was like: "We don't need those if I'm already able to blow him up without the nukes..."
"NO DONT GET OUT OF THERE I WANT THE ENEMY COMPLETELY GONE!"
Roughly explained, he wanted to destroy all the enemy structures first before finishing off the Commander.
I disconnected out of pure facepalm.