Nobel laureate forced out of studies after making joke about women

Recommended Videos

NeutralStasis

New member
Sep 23, 2014
45
0
0
In my mind, this sacking of people that don't go along with the ideology of others is a slippery slope even in the best of times. You can be upset at something someone says, you can agree to disagree, but to seek out and destroy someone because they see things differently is fucking insane.

I know that I will get a lot of hate from those a little left of the mark, but ponder this...if a point in time comes to pass that your views and ideology is no longer the "good" one, would you like to have the same treatment. Would you like to be fired because of something that you said? When it comes down to it, I disagree with Mr. Scientist. I think everyone who wants to be in the STEM sciences and has the aptitude, should be welcomed eagerly. But, I will not remove his right to believe what he believes. It is a BAD IDEA.
 

Addendum_Forthcoming

Queen of the Edit
Feb 4, 2009
3,647
0
0
Marxie said:
And I've personally got 10 days in SIZO for calling Mr. President a ****. Fucking HOW does mine or yours suffering from a not very just system absolves said systems flaws?

"Oh, everyone gets fired if they piss off their employer!"
YES! And some time ago everyone got fired if they pissed off the Party, and somehow we found enough consciousness in ourselves to say "Hey guys, you know what? This is not right!"
So hyperbole, got it. By all means ... we should create a system where the indebted, who employ you at personal risk, can be ridiculed on their own private property or during public events? People have the right to ask you to leave if you are not a fit rolemodel of the company. This is not some crime of the century. Pretending like an employer telling you that you're fired is equivalent to being thrown in jail because you said something mean about your Soviet Premier is HARDLY comparable.

If I had workers calling me a **** in my place of business, I would take them aside and tell them quite clearly that I am asking for their resignation. If only to spare them the embarassment of being told to leave. Pretending this is equivalent to 3 years labour in a work camp is ridiculous.

My boss had a right to fire me. I lost my cool with some particularly stupid customers complaining about how their food got cold, because they ordered so much and I personally WARNED THEM that bringing out all the mains AT ONCE meant that some dishes would naturally be cold if eaten at the same rate of other dishes with a burner to keep them warm. I did not handle the situation well. I would likely never do it again. I regretted what I said, even though what I said wasn't as mindlessly stupid or public as this. But my EMPLOYER would have no ideas as to my regret. Would have no idea whether I would say what I said again. And thus, why, you don't see me complaining that it was 'unjust'.

It's not fair. But it's not unjustified. There is a difference. Because we're humans... (natural exceptions for Uwe Boll apply).

Marxie said:
Well, if our society is AWWRIGHT and it's functioning does not produce any sort of conflicts - why is this entire feminism thing is a thing? Why, maybe because society IS flawed in a plenty of regards and people are looking for ways to right their wrongs?
What exactly would you write into law that would stop employers from firing employees over what they say or do in the workforce? Or are we to assume that any discourse should be welcome anywhere, even on someone else's private property or as a representative of a company?

Marxie said:
So, freedom of speech is not an issue if we delegate the punishing power from government to anyone else? Well, I will become rich, get me a monopoly in some field and will destroy careers and livelihood of anyone who says something I don't like. That would be totally cool, right?
Please stop pretending like you understand what freedom of speech is. Free expression does not stop you from being unemployable because of what you say. It stops a government from unjustly penalizing, or restraining you, for what you say. You have every right to talk .... I have every right to kick you off private property. You have every right to say what you want, you have no rights to me paying you to say what you want to say. You have every right to say what you want to say, I have every right to not have to listen to you.

If you're expecting me to grant you audience, payment, or protection of labour regardless of what you say, you are effectively telling me that my rights to be free of your garbage, my rights to choose my associations beyond the specifics of my obligations, are invalid. In which case, free speech is no longer free. It costs someone their rights.

Marxie said:
Like Anita Sarkeesian says: "That is the problem"
I don't give a flying fuck what someone else has to say. It makes sense. That's enough.
 

And Man

New member
May 12, 2014
309
0
0
Hahahahahahahahah. Holy shit the responses to this thread are fucking ridiculous. "Muh freedom of speech." It doesn't matter what your views on "freedom of speech" or "SJWs" are. He wasn't making a joke to coworkers or some shit like that. The man was making a public speech as a guest at a luncheon and insulted his entire audience while officially representing his employer. Ya know, kinda like all those journalists that wrote those stupid "gamers are dead" articles, except worse because it's in a goddamn professional and educational environment. And no, it wasn't even a joke. He just claimed that it was once a shitstorm started brewing to try and alleviate it. The man getting fired is just standard business handling of such an issue. The people complaining about him getting fired clearly have no understanding of professionalism or business and workplace standards.

Like, holy shit. Choose your fucking battles better. Both sides. Instead of claiming that every instance of "SJW political correctness" or every instance of "misogyny" is the end of the fucking world, maybe take a little fucking context into consideration and stop being such a blind extremist?
 

Beliyal

Big Stupid Jellyfish
Jun 7, 2010
503
0
0
NeutralStasis said:
When it comes down to it, I disagree with Mr. Scientist. I think everyone who wants to be in the STEM sciences and has the aptitude, should be welcomed eagerly. But, I will not remove his right to believe what he believes. It is a BAD IDEA.
I fail to see how his right to believe what he wants to believe is being removed. He can still believe women are overly sensitive crybabies, but his employers don't want him to represent them like that because they disagree. He can still believe that and maybe find employers who will accept his views and promote them.

When you are employed anywhere in the world, there are rules to adhere to. You, as an employee, represent the company or university you work for. If your behaviour reflects badly on the company or university, your employers have all the right in the world to fire you. They are not removing your right to believe in what you want, they are just not obligated to have you around to misrepresent their company, affect their public appearance and potentially push away customers.
 

BloatedGuppy

New member
Feb 3, 2010
9,572
0
0
Pluvia said:
It really shouldn't have taken to the third page for someone to say this.

Tumblr never got him fired. Twitter never got him fired. His superiors fired him because he said something that damaged their image.

This is so common that it makes me wonder if the people thinking this is outrageous have ever even had a job. Hell I was told I would be fired from my last job if I said sorry to a customer if they hurt themselves in the store.

He got fired by the university for the comments he made. This is the real world, this isn't new.
It isn't new for people to be fired for embarrassing their employer, no.

It is relatively new that things you say/do might end up on social media and get signal boosted to an almost ridiculous degree.

I'm reminded of...what was it. That dongle thing. The guys making dongle jokes. And they got fired for making dongle jokes because a woman at the tech conference took a picture and put them up on social media and a shitstorm ensued. And then there was a backlash and SHE got fired. Who won, there? Was that business as usual in any respect?

I have no idea if Hunt deserved to be fired or not, that's between Hunt and his employer. What I do know is that I DON'T know, and that my opinions on the subject don't amount to a hill of beans.
 

Gorrath

New member
Feb 22, 2013
1,648
0
0
And Man said:
Hahahahahahahahah. Holy shit the responses to this thread are fucking ridiculous. "Muh freedom of speech." It doesn't matter what your views on "freedom of speech" or "SJWs" are. He wasn't making a joke to coworkers or some shit like that. The man was making a public speech as a guest at a luncheon and insulted his entire audience while officially representing his employer. Ya know, kinda like all those journalists that wrote those stupid "gamers are dead" articles, except worse because it's in a goddamn professional and educational environment. And no, it wasn't even a joke. He just claimed that it was once a shitstorm started brewing to try and alleviate it. The man getting fired is just standard business handling of such an issue. The people complaining about him getting fired clearly have no understanding of professionalism or business and workplace standards.

Like, holy shit. Choose your fucking battles better. Both sides. Instead of claiming that every instance of "SJW political correctness" or every instance of "misogyny" is the end of the fucking world, maybe take a little fucking context into consideration and stop being such a blind extremist?
I'm with you; the guy didn't get canned because of a lack of freedom of speech or because he held some silly ideas, he got canned because he had the idiotic idea that a professional luncheon was the place to air out a bunch of his personal baggage. I'm not for firing everyone who ever says something stupid or controversial either, but that's up to the employer to decide since it is their reputation he's dinging with every stupid remark.

Unfortunately, the successful approach of "weaponizing" identity politics has been noted and adopted by almost everyone these days. "He's a Nobel laureate and knighted for his good work!" So fucking what? My own real identity is linked with what some would consider impressive awards, they would not, should NOT make me immune to the consequences of saying stupid shit. People's ideas should be considered based on the merit of those ideas not the race/religion/sex/gender/name/credit/awards that make up that person's identity. Weaponized identity politics hurts us all and I sorely wish people would stop!
 

Lil devils x_v1legacy

More Lego Goats Please!
May 17, 2011
2,728
0
0
He is an old man, old men have old ideas. I think that should have been taken into consideration before asking him to step down. Yes, his comments were sexist, uncalled for, and have no business being said but also a sign of his times. If he failed to apologize or continued on with such things, then I can see asking him to step down privately, he is past retirement age and suggesting it may be time to retire at that point. Forcing him out seems a bit harsh for an old man with old ideas of how the world works. Sexism just as racism should fade when those that promote such things are past. There is no need to hurry them out faster, life is short enough it happens before we know it.
 

Thaluikhain

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 16, 2010
19,538
4,128
118
Lil devils x said:
If he failed to apologize or continued on with such things,
He did, he went on to dig himself in deeper, saying that he was joking, but that what he said was absolutely true.
 

Gorrath

New member
Feb 22, 2013
1,648
0
0
BloatedGuppy said:
Pluvia said:
It really shouldn't have taken to the third page for someone to say this.

Tumblr never got him fired. Twitter never got him fired. His superiors fired him because he said something that damaged their image.

This is so common that it makes me wonder if the people thinking this is outrageous have ever even had a job. Hell I was told I would be fired from my last job if I said sorry to a customer if they hurt themselves in the store.

He got fired by the university for the comments he made. This is the real world, this isn't new.
It isn't new for people to be fired for embarrassing their employer, no.

It is relatively new that things you say/do might end up on social media and get signal boosted to an almost ridiculous degree.

I'm reminded of...what was it. That dongle thing. The guys making dongle jokes. And they got fired for making dongle jokes because a woman at the tech conference took a picture and put them up on social media and a shitstorm ensued. And then there was a backlash and SHE got fired. Who won, there? Was that business as usual in any respect?

I have no idea if Hunt deserved to be fired or not, that's between Hunt and his employer. What I do know is that I DON'T know, and that my opinions on the subject don't amount to a hill of beans.
Emphasis mine. I'd not downplay your opinion so much. You are one voice in a sea of millions but individual voices do matter greatly. What has really changed is that the populace wield enormous power through social media. Within a single generation, people have had to go from only really having to worry about the opinion of those who were influential in the media to having to worry about the opinion of we, the mob. In a lot of ways this is a good thing, it is a form of democratizing opinion by making the opinion of the masses have serious weight. The problem is that we, the mob, are often poorly informed, badly educated or both. So what we need to do is temper our opinions, restrain our emotions and educate ourselves as best we're able so that we can wield this new power with thoughtful consideration.

The idea that, because we are individuals in a massive sea of individuals, our opinions don't matter, becomes cause for shirking this responsible handling of social media power. If we want the social lynch mobs to end, we need to realize just how important every one person in that mob is and we must be conscious of how little we know, just like you are in this case. Bravo for expressing that sentiment but don't underestimate your own opinion.
 

Lil devils x_v1legacy

More Lego Goats Please!
May 17, 2011
2,728
0
0
thaluikhain said:
Lil devils x said:
If he failed to apologize or continued on with such things,
He did, he went on to dig himself in deeper, saying that he was joking, but that what he said was absolutely true.
Yes, it could have been suggested he retire.. he is well within retirement age at this point. I feel bad for old men and their old distorted views. LOL
 

Yan007

New member
Jan 31, 2011
262
0
0
Tells joke about girls crying when criticized.

Is forced to resign because girls won't stop crying about what he said.

Am I the only one seeing that angle?
 

RealRT

New member
Feb 28, 2014
1,058
0
0
Because it doesn't matter how smart you are and how much have your research helped humanity, if you allow yourself anything that can be interpreted as sexist - you are pedophile Hitler. Good job, good job. It's like that other time when a scientist got hounded for appearing in a shirt with bikini-clad ladies on it in public.