No, I'm not one of THOSE guys. I know ROGUE looks terrible by today's standards, but I don't care, because it's the most fun dungeon-crawling I've ever experienced. It also doesn't present action or fast-paced combat like Oblivion does, and I like action and fast-paced combat. While I would like a version of ROGUE with today's graphics and today's physics (from a first-person perspective), it doesn't exist yet, so I have to stick with ROGUE itself.Ionami said:Oh... you're one of THOSE guys... the ones who post comments about how no console nowadays could top the Commodore 64 and stuff like that.vdgmprgrmr said:It's not near "the best game ever."
If anything deserves that title (but nothing actually does), it's ROGUE.
Oblivion's only redeeming feature for me was the dungeon crawling (and the physics, I just love physics so much in games). I really liked it (even if the dungeons were made of set-pieces arranged differently each time, I liked it. It was the best modern dungeon crawling I'd experienced so far). (ROGUE isn't modern, but if it were, (it would be the messiah of action "RPG"s) it would be the best modern dungeon crawling I would experience.)
I could be wrong, though, since when I tried to play Morrowind on the XBox, it was boring as hell, and when I tried to play it on my computer (not the XBox disc, I had both versions) my computer turned the disc into three parts of a disc. I don't have much experience with Morrowind's dungeons. Perhaps I should go torrent it... I'm such a dirty pirate...
ROGUE looks absolutely terrible by the way. (By today's standards anyways, but that's just it isn't it? Todays standards.) Time to move on friend.
Yes you get better armor and weapons later in the game but that doesn't help you much.Danprezco said:On that note, I think it is better that the monsters level up. You get more exp from fighting and you don't just instantly kill them after you reach like lvl 25. They also get better armor and weapons you can take, which is nice.Firefly22 said:It was enjoyable when you first started off but later on,as you level up,the monsters leveled up with you which totally defeated the entire point of leveling your character.
Are you kidding me? I still play the Monkey Island games on a regular basis. One of my top 5 games is Jagged Alliance 2, which although not as old as ROGUE, is from 1999. And I play that at least once a week. I also love some of the earlier Mech Warrior games. And X-Wing vs. TIE fighter. That game rocks.vdgmprgrmr said:No, I'm not one of THOSE guys. I know ROGUE looks terrible by today's standards, but I don't care, because it's the most fun dungeon-crawling I've ever experienced. It also doesn't present action or fast-paced combat like Oblivion does, and I like action and fast-paced combat. While I would like a version of ROGUE with today's graphics and today's physics (from a first-person perspective), it doesn't exist yet, so I have to stick with ROGUE itself.Ionami said:Oh... you're one of THOSE guys... the ones who post comments about how no console nowadays could top the Commodore 64 and stuff like that.vdgmprgrmr said:It's not near "the best game ever."
If anything deserves that title (but nothing actually does), it's ROGUE.
Oblivion's only redeeming feature for me was the dungeon crawling (and the physics, I just love physics so much in games). I really liked it (even if the dungeons were made of set-pieces arranged differently each time, I liked it. It was the best modern dungeon crawling I'd experienced so far). (ROGUE isn't modern, but if it were, (it would be the messiah of action "RPG"s) it would be the best modern dungeon crawling I would experience.)
I could be wrong, though, since when I tried to play Morrowind on the XBox, it was boring as hell, and when I tried to play it on my computer (not the XBox disc, I had both versions) my computer turned the disc into three parts of a disc. I don't have much experience with Morrowind's dungeons. Perhaps I should go torrent it... I'm such a dirty pirate...
ROGUE looks absolutely terrible by the way. (By today's standards anyways, but that's just it isn't it? Todays standards.) Time to move on friend.
My favorite games ever consist of ROGUE, STALKER, Deus Ex, and the Half-Life games. Only one of those can really be considered to be really old. I like old games and new games. Some new games I like better than old games, and some old games I like better than new games.
Definitely not one of THOSE guys. But I'll dare to say you're one of those OTHER guys, who think newer games are simply better than older games, and don't understand how people can like older games so much.
Look into Darkfall Online, you will be happy ;DDanprezco said:Am I the only one that thinks that it's gonna be near impossible to top this game? I've played Fallout 3 and the ending is disappointing to say the least.
Just looking for anyone else who loved the fourth installment of the elder scrolls series.
BloodSquirrel said:This is the kind of comment that leads me to believe that most people who bash Fable 2 haven't actually played it. There are a ton of ways to make money in the game, and you don't HAVE to use any one of them.ZacQuickSilver said:What strikes me is how intensely HYPOCRITICAL that comment was because in Fable 2 you HAVE to work. It's not even introduced as some quest-disguised grind. It's just plain work.
Oblivion is more action-oriented, while Fallout depends more on percentages than stats.Azeban said:Are these Bethesda games (Oblivion/Fallout3) mostly real-time action with pieces of RPG (like Bioshock), or mostly RPG with occasional pieces of action?
I hated that too, wolves travel in packs, but no, they're spread out in this game.JMeganSnow said:If you want to complain about flow, complain about the random monster pop every 15 feet.geldonyetich said:Well, it might seem that way if you completely misread what I was originally complaining about as being difficulty related when it was actually flow related.JMeganSnow said:Is it just me, or is complaining simultaneously that the game is *too hard* and *not hard enough* just *ironic*?