Parents accused of sexual abuse for taking pictures of their kids
- Thread starter Stormz
- Start date
Recommended Videos
What the hell? You do know what pedophile means. It means you rape kids and I don't think that will be accepted. Was it that you meant to say is that they wont be pursued as much?Fredrick2003 said:
Um... right. This could happen anywhere. It is more likely to happen in America but it can happen anywhere. I never got the, "DON'T FUCK WITH US WE GOT GUNS" stereotype came to be. Probably from Chris Hansen... Bastard.Switchlurk said:
Most people who work those photograph booths are grade-A perverts, so of course they'd assume that anything with a hint of skin is sexually charged.
Fucking morons.
Fucking morons.
Well, I just that means that I was sexually abused as a child. My parents have a picture of me covered in mud and naked. It's strange because my parents are the least perverted people I know.
Seconded... Might as well say serial killers and cannibals will become the norm soon. -_-2012 Wont Happen said:
As for the topic at hand, it is rather sickening. They aren't doing anything to their family or kids and that is defamation of character. Ugh. Luckily I already knew that people are this stupid hence the digital camera. We also have an ultrasound of Mikey sporting wood. Perfect blackmail material when he gets his first love.
OMG!! 0.0
My parents abused the living hell out of me as a kid!!!!!
That picture where I am naked in summer, playing in the yard, being cute?! Completely posed by my parents and in no way did I realize that I was being photographed!
All of those pictures of baths with me and my sister? *holds his head and starts crying*
If only I had seen the truth sooner!!!
My parents abused the living hell out of me as a kid!!!!!
That picture where I am naked in summer, playing in the yard, being cute?! Completely posed by my parents and in no way did I realize that I was being photographed!
All of those pictures of baths with me and my sister? *holds his head and starts crying*
If only I had seen the truth sooner!!!
I concur with your correction.Eleuthera said:
Pedophilia is merely the attraction to adolescents and pre-adolescents.
Raping children places the moniker of "child molester," a term with far less ambiguity.
And yet the police left Baby P to be beaten to death despite knowing it was happening... they were too busy arresting people for taking photo's of there children.. this sort of reminds me of that case were a women was going to be fined for littering because her child had thrown a sausage roll on the floor in a tantrum.
That is part of the situation - seeking remuneration for damages. I think that it belittles their suffering and puts a price tag on pain but that isn't the point.Silver said:
Walmart doesn't give a damn and doesn't change policy, until someone hits them in the pocket book. When their bottom line slips a little, officers higher in the chain of command stand issuing orders. If they didn't take this to court, a lower level PR peon would have handled this and assured the parents that 'Walmart does its very best to serve every customer while trying to serve the community.'
Good point, and it's not even that much. Paedophiles are pre-pubescents children only. The sexual preference to pubescents and adolescents are called Hebephilia and Ephebophilia respectivally.dietpeachsnapple said:
This is an important point, designations like paedophile or ephebophile are discriptives of sexual preference and\or orientation only. They imply neither disorder nor "fetish". Though they may when used in relation to chronophilia.
For instance, most people on this forum are teleiophiles. (attraction to adults.)
Remember this, having a sexual attraction to children makes one no more likely to rape a child than having a sexual attraction to women means you're going to rape the next women you meet. Get? Got it? good?
There are a LOT of sickos out there. The worker at walmart probably thought he was doing the right thing... but fuck they shouldn't have taken it as far as to separate the parents from the kids without any background checks or I dunno, a simple psychological interview with them... which sounds logical enough of a step towards making sure what the situation really is.
Don't mean to be offensive, but...
are you a pedo?
I mean, you make a very valid point and all but still... =S
Even you might look at it that way, it's still kinda sick. Somebody with a sexual attraction towards children might not wanna rape them, but they still will wanna have some form of release from their "unusual likings" even if it is in the form of watching child porn, it is still hurting a kid, don't you think?
Sick sick subject indeed.
...dude, wtf?vivaldiscool said:
Don't mean to be offensive, but...
are you a pedo?
I mean, you make a very valid point and all but still... =S
Even you might look at it that way, it's still kinda sick. Somebody with a sexual attraction towards children might not wanna rape them, but they still will wanna have some form of release from their "unusual likings" even if it is in the form of watching child porn, it is still hurting a kid, don't you think?
Sick sick subject indeed.
Why the Wal-Mart hate in this thread? The clerk and the company did nothing even remotely wrong. They saw photos of behavior that, for whatever reason, they weren't willing or able to make a judgment call about. So they reported it to the appropriate authorities with the faith and trust that Arizona CPS would be able to handle it properly from there.
The villain here is Arizona CPS and their complete mishandling of the investigation. They should have been able to clear this up immediately with little more than a phone call. Instead they went off half-cocked and started pulling kids out of their home with essentially NO EVIDENCE OF ABUSE.
The sad outcome of this is that, knowing that CPS in many States has gone way off the deep end in similar situations before, I am LESS likely to report something that I might consider borderline for fear of CPS handling the case so poorly. I, and Wal-Mart too, should be able to have faith that CPS will do their jobs competently and properly, without me having to worry about becoming the instigator of ridiculous and over-the-top false allegations.
The villain here is Arizona CPS and their complete mishandling of the investigation. They should have been able to clear this up immediately with little more than a phone call. Instead they went off half-cocked and started pulling kids out of their home with essentially NO EVIDENCE OF ABUSE.
The sad outcome of this is that, knowing that CPS in many States has gone way off the deep end in similar situations before, I am LESS likely to report something that I might consider borderline for fear of CPS handling the case so poorly. I, and Wal-Mart too, should be able to have faith that CPS will do their jobs competently and properly, without me having to worry about becoming the instigator of ridiculous and over-the-top false allegations.