YOU NINJA!Polaris19 said:America apparently owns a banhammer. >_<
I GOING TO KI-
Wait, could I get hit by Obama's banhammer?
Umm...
*Pats Polaris*
YOU NINJA!Polaris19 said:America apparently owns a banhammer. >_<
Regardless, it's still restricting what you can say. Also things like libel, you can't make insult or make up lies about whoever you want.Bruin said:That's inciting panic.lostzombies.com said:hmmm, go test out US freedom of speech by shouting fire in a cinema...jbchillin said:lol he's British he has no freedom of speech.
No western country has 100% freedom of speech
I was going to say something much more rude, but I'm positive I would be banned for it, so I'll shorten that and just say once you compromise public order and safety on purpose, you're already in the wrong.
That makes no sense. I'm not a lawyer so I can't argue this point on basis of facts, but how can a country hold visitors to its laws but not grant visitors its provisions?rebus_forever said:exactly right, freedom of speech isnt something America assumes others have a right to only its own citizens.AgentNein said:As I understand it there were vague threats. Threats are not covered under freedom of speech. Secondly, he's not a US citizen.thenumberthirteen said:What happened to free speech? I believe we should have the right to call world leaders what we like.
Yeah! I hereby declare that from this day forward, Barack Obama's name shall officially be "Snookypoos"!thenumberthirteen said:What happened to free speech? I believe we should have the right to call world leaders what we like.
exactly what I was thinking, another thing, How did he get Obama's email?Polaris19 said:America apparently owns a banhammer. >_<
No, not "regardless", because screaming fire and having a stampede of people in a movie theater trample somebody is murder.lostzombies.com said:Regardless, it's still restricting what you can say. Also things like libel, you can't make insult or make up lies about whoever you want.Bruin said:That's inciting panic.lostzombies.com said:hmmm, go test out US freedom of speech by shouting fire in a cinema...jbchillin said:lol he's British he has no freedom of speech.
No western country has 100% freedom of speech
I was going to say something much more rude, but I'm positive I would be banned for it, so I'll shorten that and just say once you compromise public order and safety on purpose, you're already in the wrong.
Freedom of Speech in all western countries is just a lie, people who think they have it are just media-toys.
Right, yeah. Except that the Bill of Rights includes things like the fifth and sixth amendments which, according to you, don't apply to non-US citizens so my argument still stands. If I come to American as a non-American I don't get due process or trial by jury, a cop can just walk up to me and shoot me in the face because I'm not covered by those rights.Mornelithe said:Because the Bill of Rights states American citizens shall be protected by these laws, not every dipshit who comes to the US. Once those dipshits go through the process of becoming American citizens, then they're protected. Until then, watch your mouth, or you may just find the FBI jamming their foot into it.
When you're in the U.S, you're protected by the rights offered to every human being.Mornelithe said:Because the Bill of Rights states American citizens shall be protected by these laws, not every dipshit who comes to the US. Once those dipshits go through the process of becoming American citizens, then they're protected. Until then, watch your mouth, or you may just find the FBI jamming their foot into it.BGH122 said:That makes no sense. I'm not a lawyer so I can't argue this point on basis of facts, but how can a country hold visitors to its laws but not grant visitors its provisions?rebus_forever said:exactly right, freedom of speech isnt something America assumes others have a right to only its own citizens.AgentNein said:As I understand it there were vague threats. Threats are not covered under freedom of speech. Secondly, he's not a US citizen.thenumberthirteen said:What happened to free speech? I believe we should have the right to call world leaders what we like.
If I go to America and murder a bunch of people they're not going to let me off since their rights and laws only apply to Americans. Similarly, they're not going to set me alight with napalm at the airport because I am granted rights even though I'm not their citizen.
It doesn't make sense to say that visitors can be held to American laws but not protected by them.
It wasn't his opinion that got him banned, it was making threats to the president.rebus_forever said:I never had this pegged as an issue of "free" speech, I had it pegged as an issue of the FBI over reacting, the idea that people can be punished for voicing an opinion wasn't even in question, if someone called me a prick and said they wanted to punch me i very much doubt I could ban them from my town, the FBI nor Obama own the USA and as far as i see the gripe was with an individual.
Still at least bush isnt still in charge or there might be a sudden revelation that the kid had wmd which would probably amount to our lap dog leaders helping the usa invade ourselves, that would've been messed up.