Poll: banned from America , is this fair?

Recommended Videos

dowdpride

New member
Jul 30, 2010
29
0
0
i find it quite ridiculas! if this british guy got threatened and insulted by an american no one would do jack all, but if an american is threatened, OH NO Call the army! besides if this british guy had any national pride he eouldn't visit the states any ways. heck, i am canadien and i hate the usa(not specific people, just the general philosophy of the country)
 

lostzombies.com

New member
Apr 26, 2010
812
0
0
Bruin said:
lostzombies.com said:
jbchillin said:
lol he's British he has no freedom of speech.
hmmm, go test out US freedom of speech by shouting fire in a cinema...

No western country has 100% freedom of speech
That's inciting panic.

I was going to say something much more rude, but I'm positive I would be banned for it, so I'll shorten that and just say once you compromise public order and safety on purpose, you're already in the wrong.
Regardless, it's still restricting what you can say. Also things like libel, you can't make insult or make up lies about whoever you want.

Freedom of Speech in all western countries is just a lie, people who think they have it are just media-toys.
 

BGH122

New member
Jun 11, 2008
1,307
0
0
rebus_forever said:
AgentNein said:
thenumberthirteen said:
What happened to free speech? I believe we should have the right to call world leaders what we like.
As I understand it there were vague threats. Threats are not covered under freedom of speech. Secondly, he's not a US citizen.
exactly right, freedom of speech isnt something America assumes others have a right to only its own citizens.
That makes no sense. I'm not a lawyer so I can't argue this point on basis of facts, but how can a country hold visitors to its laws but not grant visitors its provisions?

If I go to America and murder a bunch of people they're not going to let me off since their rights and laws only apply to Americans. Similarly, they're not going to set me alight with napalm at the airport because I am granted rights even though I'm not their citizen.

It doesn't make sense to say that visitors can be held to American laws but not protected by them.
 

busterkeatonrules

- in Glorious Black & White!
Legacy
Jun 22, 2009
1,280
0
41
Country
Norway
thenumberthirteen said:
What happened to free speech? I believe we should have the right to call world leaders what we like.
Yeah! I hereby declare that from this day forward, Barack Obama's name shall officially be "Snookypoos"!
 

Bruin

New member
Aug 16, 2010
340
0
0
lostzombies.com said:
Bruin said:
lostzombies.com said:
jbchillin said:
lol he's British he has no freedom of speech.
hmmm, go test out US freedom of speech by shouting fire in a cinema...

No western country has 100% freedom of speech
That's inciting panic.

I was going to say something much more rude, but I'm positive I would be banned for it, so I'll shorten that and just say once you compromise public order and safety on purpose, you're already in the wrong.
Regardless, it's still restricting what you can say. Also things like libel, you can't make insult or make up lies about whoever you want.

Freedom of Speech in all western countries is just a lie, people who think they have it are just media-toys.
No, not "regardless", because screaming fire and having a stampede of people in a movie theater trample somebody is murder.

If you want to be correct, I'll let you be--You are correct. It's a limitation to your freedom of speech. But is it a limitation to my freedom to walk around wherever I want to sit outside your house with plastic explosives strapped to my back?

What's funny about your last statement is that the press is one of the biggest forms of freedom of speech. It's the sign that America is still free when people can criticize their government and even themselves. Nobody is forcing you to believe what the media says. Just as nobody is forcing you to slurp down all that conspiracy bullshit.
 

ivxx

New member
Sep 19, 2010
4
0
0
It strikes me as odd that so many are confusing "freedom of speech" with "freedom to say whatever the fuck I want with absolutely no consequences".

Picture it this way...you're walking down the street after having a few pints, checking out various shops, and spy a shopkeeper outside his establishment. You proceed to unleash a string of verbal abuse, tell this particular shopkeeper how much you hate his shop, his management style, and his haircut.

Then you act surprised when he bars your way as you try and walk through the door.

Moral(s) of this story:

a. Why would (or should, for that matter) any of the rights or privileges that citizens of another country enjoy be extend to foreigners? Seriously, it boggles the mind that it bothers any of you that this tea-drinker wasn't extended the same rights as his Miller Lite pounding cousins.

b. You are always allowed to say whatever you want to say. Just don't be surprised if you get banned from the club (or popped in the mouth) for saying it. Really, this should be common sense...
 

BGH122

New member
Jun 11, 2008
1,307
0
0
Mornelithe said:
Because the Bill of Rights states American citizens shall be protected by these laws, not every dipshit who comes to the US. Once those dipshits go through the process of becoming American citizens, then they're protected. Until then, watch your mouth, or you may just find the FBI jamming their foot into it.
Right, yeah. Except that the Bill of Rights includes things like the fifth and sixth amendments which, according to you, don't apply to non-US citizens so my argument still stands. If I come to American as a non-American I don't get due process or trial by jury, a cop can just walk up to me and shoot me in the face because I'm not covered by those rights.
 

Varrdy

New member
Feb 25, 2010
875
0
0
I would have had more respect for America if Obama had emailed back: "Yeah? Well fuck you too, buddy!"

The guy did something rather daft but the punishment seems a little harsh. I'm heading back to the States next year. Maybe if I email Obama and tell him what a great guy he is and how much I love him, I'll be able to skip customs...

Wardy
 

Bruin

New member
Aug 16, 2010
340
0
0
Mornelithe said:
BGH122 said:
rebus_forever said:
AgentNein said:
thenumberthirteen said:
What happened to free speech? I believe we should have the right to call world leaders what we like.
As I understand it there were vague threats. Threats are not covered under freedom of speech. Secondly, he's not a US citizen.
exactly right, freedom of speech isnt something America assumes others have a right to only its own citizens.
That makes no sense. I'm not a lawyer so I can't argue this point on basis of facts, but how can a country hold visitors to its laws but not grant visitors its provisions?

If I go to America and murder a bunch of people they're not going to let me off since their rights and laws only apply to Americans. Similarly, they're not going to set me alight with napalm at the airport because I am granted rights even though I'm not their citizen.

It doesn't make sense to say that visitors can be held to American laws but not protected by them.
Because the Bill of Rights states American citizens shall be protected by these laws, not every dipshit who comes to the US. Once those dipshits go through the process of becoming American citizens, then they're protected. Until then, watch your mouth, or you may just find the FBI jamming their foot into it.
When you're in the U.S, you're protected by the rights offered to every human being.

We have natural rights here--rights entitled to every person in our country regardless of whether they're American or not.

When you make threats to the president and the FBI gets ahold of them, American or not, you're going to get looked at, as I said before.
 

Sinclair Solutions

New member
Jul 22, 2010
1,611
0
0
America: the World's Largest Forum.

Are we getting all the fact's here? I highly doubt he got banned for calling Obama a prick. I have friends who do that on a daily basis. Did he ever threaten the President's life? Because...you know...that's bad and junk.
 

Raesvelg

New member
Oct 22, 2008
486
0
0
Blatantly irresponsible speech (shouting "Fire!" in a theater) isn't protected, slander can get you sued, lying under oath can get you arrested, and MAKING DEATH THREATS, particularly to the President of the United States, can also land you a set of negative consequences.

Freedom of Speech is not absolute people, in ANY country.
 

rebus_forever

New member
Jan 28, 2009
376
0
0
I never had this pegged as an issue of "free" speech, I had it pegged as an issue of the FBI over reacting, the idea that people can be punished for voicing an opinion wasn't even in question, if someone called me a prick and said they wanted to punch me i very much doubt I could ban them from my town, the FBI nor Obama own the USA and as far as i see the gripe was with an individual.

Still at least bush isnt still in charge or there might be a sudden revelation that the kid had wmd which would probably amount to our lap dog leaders helping the usa invade ourselves, that would've been messed up.
 

JWW

New member
Jan 6, 2010
657
0
0
I swear, this country feels more and more like the USSR every day.
 

Bruin

New member
Aug 16, 2010
340
0
0
rebus_forever said:
I never had this pegged as an issue of "free" speech, I had it pegged as an issue of the FBI over reacting, the idea that people can be punished for voicing an opinion wasn't even in question, if someone called me a prick and said they wanted to punch me i very much doubt I could ban them from my town, the FBI nor Obama own the USA and as far as i see the gripe was with an individual.

Still at least bush isnt still in charge or there might be a sudden revelation that the kid had wmd which would probably amount to our lap dog leaders helping the usa invade ourselves, that would've been messed up.
It wasn't his opinion that got him banned, it was making threats to the president.

Do that to anybody and you'll get punished.