Poll: Can England be invaded

Recommended Videos
May 28, 2009
3,698
0
0
Anything can be invaded successfully if the whole world was against it, otherwise I'd have to say Britain's pretty much secure. Except from the terrible might of the Shetland Islands.
 

BlackHat

New member
Jan 30, 2009
80
0
0
Nato command, Europe, Usa,Austria, Trident nuclear system, one of the best trained armys in the world which has won every conflict that it has been in since the F***kin romans,God, The Queen, The SAS, One of the best trained navys in the world, One of the most technologically advanced and best trained Airfoces, An entire nation who would fight to the death to protect it, Some of the tuffest sea crossing conditions in the world, Bad Weather, Some of the most famous generals in history and the stratigical heratige that it brings, One of the most innovative nations (we invented everything in the last 40 years and most of the modern battle tatics other than shock and awe which dosen't work for shit america two wars you havn't won vientnam and iraq), Stiff upper lip, The Scottish ( the only thing there really good at which is beating stuff up) , tea and ale

Nuff said
 

Optimus Hagrid

New member
Feb 14, 2009
2,075
0
0
BlackHat said:
Nato command, Europe, Usa,Austria, Trident nuclear system, one of the best trained armys in the world which has won every conflict that it has been in since the F***kin romans,God, The Queen, The SAS, One of the best trained navys in the world, One of the most technologically advanced and best trained Airfoces, An entire nation who would fight to the death to protect it, Some of the tuffest sea crossing conditions in the world, Bad Weather, Some of the most famous generals in history and the stratigical heratige that it brings, One of the most innovative nations (we invented everything in the last 40 years and most of the modern battle tatics other than shock and awe which dosen't work for shit america two wars you havn't won vientnam and iraq), Stiff upper lip, The Scottish ( the only thing there really good at which is beating stuff up) , tea and ale

Nuff said
HELL YES MF's
 
May 28, 2009
3,698
0
0
Even though a lot of the population of Britain can be total gits with no apparent respect for anything, BlackHat is totally correct in that we would fight to the death to protect our country. Do you know why? Because those total gits despise the rest of the world more. Then there's the others that genuinely care.

You could try to invade would-be invaders, but you'd get bored when you find you can't do what we can and withstand the awesome might of our vomity weather and mentally-challenged soap operas.
 

Nickzilla

New member
May 12, 2009
52
0
0
"Yes, but it will be hard."

I really couldn't be bothered to read all ten pages of this thread, so I'll just stick with this: it's really hard to sail troops over the English channel without them getting sunk by all those boats we seem to have. Nazi Germany stood the best chance, and I think they only got Jersey.
 

xChevelle24

New member
Mar 10, 2009
730
0
0
BlackHat said:
Nato command, Europe, Usa,Austria, Trident nuclear system, one of the best trained armys in the world which has won every conflict that it has been in since the F***kin romans,God, The Queen, The SAS, One of the best trained navys in the world, One of the most technologically advanced and best trained Airfoces, An entire nation who would fight to the death to protect it, Some of the tuffest sea crossing conditions in the world, Bad Weather, Some of the most famous generals in history and the stratigical heratige that it brings, One of the most innovative nations (we invented everything in the last 40 years and most of the modern battle tatics other than shock and awe which dosen't work for shit america two wars you havn't won vientnam and iraq), Stiff upper lip, The Scottish ( the only thing there really good at which is beating stuff up) , tea and ale

Nuff said
Not to start a flame war, but Navy Seals are better than the SAS. The U.S. airforce is better than yours. The U.S. Army is of larger force and also better trained. I could go on and on but that just invites a flame war. Oh, and when I see British soldiers baynet charging companies of soldiers when they stand no chance of winning, like, say the Japanese did in WWII, then you can that you would die for your country. Oh, and in case you didn't know, we declared Victory in Iraq over 4 years ago.
 

Dudemeister

New member
Feb 24, 2008
1,227
0
0
Zombie Badger said:
The only uninvadeable countries are Russia and Canada. Napoleon and Hitler got the shit kicked out of them trying to invade Russia, and when the US attacked Canada in the War of 1812, they lost and the Canadians burned down the White House.
This is true but the Hitler's army still managed to actually invade Russia.
Also, Canadians burning down the White House doesn't make Canada uninvadable.
 

new_age_reject

Lives in dactylic hexameter.
Dec 28, 2008
1,160
0
0
Zombie Badger said:
The only uninvadeable countries are Russia and Canada. Napoleon and Hitler got the shit kicked out of them trying to invade Russia, and when the US attacked Canada in the War of 1812, they lost and the Canadians burned down the White House.
This.
I'd shack up with these two.
And Finland.
 

wolfshrimp

New member
May 6, 2009
119
0
0
why would you want to? England has nothing to offer. We have some brilliant scenery but basically if you are seeking to expand your influence over people, forget the English, 98% of the population are fit only for extermination, a more annoying bunch of miserable boring stupid wastes of resources you would be hard pressed to find. Invading them would only make you look bad on a military scale.

I may just point out I'm English to justify my claim.
 

Tharwen

Ep. VI: Return of the turret
May 7, 2009
9,145
0
41
Trivun said:
We have the greatest army in the world except on numbers (America and China beat us there). I'm sorry, USA, but it's true, we do have a better army, you simply beat us on numbers, but our technology is actually just as good as or better than yours on pretty much all fronts. The only problem is that cost cutting Labour don't like spending so hardly any sees the front line. If we did have that stuff out there instead of lying around in equipment stores back at Sandhurst, Cosford, Plymouth, Cranwell and everywhere else, then it's a widely held fact we would easily be able to beat the Americans in battle. As it happens, simply because of that we would be able to resist most attacks on our country (not counting nuclear warfare, but since we also apparently have nukes [I'm still slightly unsure there though] then everyone would lose there).

That said, no country, even America, is completely invulnerable. I know quite a bit about military tactics, warfare in general, the UK Armed Forces and have first hand experience of UK military training. But I can safely say that with a well trained and large enough force, we could still be invaded successfully. By the same token we could probably invade America (thank you, 'special relationship', take what you want, why don't you?). Love Actually reference in the brackets, by the way. No country is invulnerable, and the UK is no exception.

Schmee said:
England can be invaded, and has been a couple times. I'm fine in Scotland, so far unconquered, and since we werent included in the "invulnerable" statment then uhm, we could just walk over the border, invasion commences.
By the way, England hasn't been successfully invaded since 1066. Since then, the English have beaten the Scottish in several wars and it was only the rise of the Stuart monarchy that finally united the two countries. Hence your comment is historically BS. Sorry, but any history textbook will support my statement over yours.
Actually... though I hate to admit it, we buy most of our newest technology from the US.
 

Rikrok77

New member
Aug 20, 2008
30
0
0
yeah, the whole 'allies' thing would be pivotal to our survival... as long as we keep two or three major allies, i think we're pretty much invulnerable. The fact we're an island means that we would be very expensive to attack, plus our navy would kick the living daylights out of most others. But why do you want a tiny, cold, wet, otherwise useless piece of land anyway?
 

DLwolfspider

New member
May 22, 2009
3
0
0
It seems that all of the posters here are fixated on the physical aspect of a 'invasion', while tanks, planes, ships and troops would be part of any action to due so they would only be final stages of such.
It is generally considered that most modern battles will be won or lost by a handful of techs and a server room destablising such things as money transfers and telecoms.
Also any country could be affected because the battlefield would now be more digital, so it is not a case of how has the most troops or nukes but which country has the most computer geeks.

but in answers to the question 'why would you want too?'
 

lwm3398

New member
Apr 15, 2009
2,896
0
0
america could do it. my reasoning? we're america.

would america do it? no. my reasoning? we like britain.

why do people say america would help? we didn't join WWII till it was almost over. and that was because we were bombed. nah, i don't think we'd give a sweet shit if britain was under supreme stress like that.

and who wants to kill britain? germany tried it...twice? i don't know much about WWI,and who germany was fighting right then. back on topic,i don't think many would try. china,israel (kinda),USA, and europe are untouchable nowadays. if all these countries and continent teamed up...dear god,we'd destroy anyone who apposed us.
 

lwm3398

New member
Apr 15, 2009
2,896
0
0
Mazty said:
England has the best military in the world. Not the best equiped, but most experience. Troops have been seeing constant Urban action since the 70's, giving them a huge advantage in modern warfare.
So if it came down to street-to-street fighting, England would be a hellish nightmare to try and capture, not to mention the fact it's an island, which again would make an invasion exceptionally difficult.
Plus England has football hooligans. They're an army in their own right.
yeah. just say "they don't like (insert team name here)" and the opposing army can already be considered blood on the ground.
 

Cheesus333

New member
Aug 20, 2008
2,523
0
0
I think that if any country invaded, they'd hand it back. The chavs would drive them insane after two minutes. We've developed a natural immunity.