Poll: Can you defeat yourself

Recommended Videos

Innocent Bystander

New member
Jan 29, 2012
59
0
0
I immediately cry out "We meet again, old friend!" and he will reply with "but this time the advantage is mine!" We will then both laugh, then we'll both go get a beer and reminisce about the good ol' days.
 

irmasterlol

New member
Apr 11, 2012
178
0
0
I happen to know for a fact that I have no ground game, so I'd try to shoot in for my legs and see if I can get the takedown. There's no way I could escape a good ground n pound from myself.
 

Erttheking

Member
Legacy
Oct 5, 2011
10,845
1
3
Country
United States
Yeah, I'm pretty sure that I can beat myself.........that came out wrong.
 

Ieyke

New member
Jul 24, 2008
1,402
0
0
Vigormortis said:
Well, let's consider:

More than likely, ruling out dopplegangers, clones, hallucinations, etc, the reason you'd suddenly be facing down a (seemingly older) bearded version of yourself is because your future self went back in time with the intention of mugging you. For whatever reason.

Considering this, if you choose to fight back, we will have one of two scenarios occur.

In one, you will defeat your future self. This will lead to you likely realizing the futility of traveling back in time to mug yourself. Meaning, your future self will never go back. Which leads to a paradox.

In the other, you lose to your future self; who likely walks away gloating about the new found money he took. In this scenario, you may feel a need for revenge. As such, you may end up deciding, at some point in the future, to go back in time and steal the money you lost in your youth. This essentially closes the loop.

In effect, our choices are:

* Win the fight, cause a time paradox
* Lose the fight, allow events to pan out

So...yeah. Losing is really the only option.
Basically, this.
.
.
.
But, I actually take option C, and simply don't hesitate to give myself my money. The Pan-Chronodimensional Council Of Ieykes have an understanding. We simply cooperate with ourselves because we know that we know what we're doing and there's no reason to question my motives. If future me needs present me's money, then he needs my money. Simple as that.

Beyond borrowing money tho, future and present me are going to have some fun if we ever meet.



To answer the actual question tho, no, I probably couldn't beat future me, because future me would be the one with the element of surprise and a battle plan. I'd just be caught off guard.
 

DkLnBr

New member
Apr 2, 2009
490
0
0
technically yes, if there is two of me then no matter the outcome "I" will win. However I think that my other self would win, as I'm not much of a fighter (but would that mean that he isn't either?)
 

Akytalusia

New member
Nov 11, 2010
1,374
0
0
it's hard to imagine myself in many of the scenarios presented by the forum these last few [periods of time]. they're just not applicable. i would never need to mug myself, therefore this must be an imposter or someone else is pulling the strings.
the most likely scenario is imposter, so i would react as i would if it was anyone else. i would not hand the wallet over. if they want it, they'll have to take it from me. this is the initial analysis. event points forthwith will be managed accordingly.
in the event that it is me, as in the case presented, i would have no way to ascertain this information and would react the same way. subsequent events will be handled by the same processes, though the results will likely be very different.
 

blueshark217

New member
Aug 15, 2009
67
0
0
I know that I'll immediately go for submissions go for a submission hold so I'll anticipate the lunge and keep my distance with strikes. Unless I predict my predicting of me going for submissions and instead go for kicks and head shots, but I'll predict that, and be prepared to counter myself, but what if I, oh balls now I'm confused.
 
Sep 13, 2009
1,589
0
0
Vuliev said:
Since I'm a reasonable person, I try to talk myself down first, see why he's resorted to crime. I'm pretty sure that I would know that I wouldn't want to harm myself, so I think I'd listen to reason and listen to what I have to say.

Failing that, it comes down to when I strike first as I would only strike to incapacitate. Or, perhaps, knowing me, I might just step slowly away because I know me, and I'd be too afraid to make a move to take my wallet.
Not only that, but even if you were in an open field, assuming that he is exactly as fit as you are he will never be able to close the initial distance. Just keep running until either your doppelganger realizes this and goes to mug someone else, or he dies from starvation. Chances are you'll always reach food first, and provided that reaching down to grab food doesn't slow you down enough to close the distance you'll eventually win. Worst case scenario you both die, but at the very least you're guaranteed to take him with you.

I don't know which option to choose, I'm legging it because it's how I can defeat myself. I shall choose option two
 
Sep 13, 2009
1,589
0
0
wulfy42 said:
The martial art I have specialized the most in is Judo, which is very defensively oriented and relies on an opponent attacking you. Since the other me would be on the offensive, I would have a large advantage and should easily be able to defeat myself.

In addition, most everyone should be able to defeat themselves if only they have realized they are fighting themself (assuming the other you has not realized it yet since they are attacking themself).

If you know how you fight, you'll know how the other you fights, while the other you won't have the same advantage. You'll know all your own weaknesses, while the other you doesn't know the same thing. If you have a bum knee, you could kick the other you's bum knee, if you can't see at all without your glasses, you can knock them off the other you etc.
Presumably wouldn't the other you also know that though? He is an identical copy, I assume that would be in mind as well as body
 

Gottesstrafe

New member
Oct 23, 2010
881
0
0
Hmm, tough answer. I suppose that if it's my future self, I'd just resolve to eat nothing but junk food and stop exercising altogether until I became an obese, wheezing, diabetic wreck sequestered to a Rascal (I'd probably have to ask myself if I was following Terminator or 12 Monkeys rules first though). If it was myself from an alternate universe where everything was its exact opposite, I'd resolve to eat healthier and work out more until the previous result was accomplished again. If the other me was a pod person or alien replicant I could try sneezing on it, hoping that its immune system would fail against Earthborne microbes like in War of the Worlds. If it was a perfect clone trying to replace me and assume my life I'd just let it and leave it footing my college loans. If this were an Evil Me scenario it'd probably be the good me trying to take my wallet back after I rightfully brained him with a bottle not a half hour ago. If it was an Evil Me clone then we'd probably link arms and merrily skip away to cut a swathe of Bonnie and Clyde-inspired bank robberies across the country, with homoerotic undercurrents. If it were a me born from a quantum paradox then I'd have to tell myself another paradox to reset the world without the other me in existence (also applicable to a replicated me generated by a computer AI for the purposes of petty revenge). If it was my doppelganger then I'd just remind myself that I wouldn't be able to mug myself without us touching each other and making the universe implode. If it was a me generated by the Skull of Corruption then I'd just outrun myself for 30 seconds until it was banished back into the aether. If another person were with me when my other self and I were to get in a fight and pull out a gun on us demanding to know who the real "me" was, I'd tell them to shoot both of us as it would be the only way to be sure.

Or of course this could just be a drug and alcohol induced hallucination or fever dream with the real me naked and hip thrusting into a mirror at 3:00 AM wearing nothing but a feather boa and a cigarette holder drooping out of my mouth like Hunter S. Thompson, all the while threatening my mirror image in the voice of the Dwarf in Red from Twin Peaks while agitatedly brandishing a candelabra in my free hand for emphasis.
 

Baldry

New member
Feb 11, 2009
2,412
0
0
I'd probably just end up convincing myself not to fight...me...We'd get on pretty well and that is when I'd decide to strike at him. Remember kids, ain't nothing wrong with fighting dirty, anyway I have to teach him I am his better so that he doesn't betray me in the future, he's already proven his prone to criminal outbursts so I have to strike him down while I have the upper hand.
 

Generic4me

New member
Oct 10, 2012
116
0
0
Normally, I would immediately punch anything pretending to be me. But if this thing is me, I would want to do something completely unexpected. Which is what I would do, but if I'm fighting myself, I can't possibly win by fighting like myself, which would be to do unpredictable attacks. So I'd be very predictable. I would never do that, which is why the other me wouldn't know what's going on and lose.

Unless he thinks of this too. Then I'll have to think of something I'd never think of.
 

Ledan

New member
Apr 15, 2009
798
0
0
Hmm.......
I suppose reasonably discussing the needs of myself and giving myself the money is out of the question?
I'm not much of a fighter, and have low endurance so the fight would be decided after only a few minutes. If I'm doing that charging thing i usually do when I attack, I'm pretty confident that I'd be able to take myself out because that never works.
 

wulfy42

New member
Jan 29, 2009
771
0
0
The Almighty Aardvark said:
wulfy42 said:
The martial art I have specialized the most in is Judo, which is very defensively oriented and relies on an opponent attacking you. Since the other me would be on the offensive, I would have a large advantage and should easily be able to defeat myself.

In addition, most everyone should be able to defeat themselves if only they have realized they are fighting themself (assuming the other you has not realized it yet since they are attacking themself).

If you know how you fight, you'll know how the other you fights, while the other you won't have the same advantage. You'll know all your own weaknesses, while the other you doesn't know the same thing. If you have a bum knee, you could kick the other you's bum knee, if you can't see at all without your glasses, you can knock them off the other you etc.
Presumably wouldn't the other you also know that though? He is an identical copy, I assume that would be in mind as well as body
It's not an exact copy since he's attacking and your defending (not attacking him). In Judo the attacker is at a serious disadvantage so if everything else is equal, the defender will always win.

As far as knowing all the weaknesses etc, that only works if the other you KNOWS everything that you know including that you and he are the same. In that case you would lose the advantage but it makes less sense for the other you to be attacking you and demanding money etc. Perhaps if it was an alternate you that has to kill you and take your place though...that would make sense.

While judo is an extreme case, most forms of combat (that don't involve guns and often even those that do) give an advantage to the person who does not attack first. You allow the other person to attack which leaves them open after you defend or dodge it. IF the other you also knew this..then he or she would never attack first....but according to the OP he or she IS attacking fist..randomly and without using any special items/abmushes etc to take advantage of being the first attacker.

Finally you have the other minor advantage..which is that if both combatants are equal (completely equal) the one with the larger options will usually win. You don't need to win the fight, or kill your other self, you just need to get away, disable him, tire him out etc. He has to keep attacking you...and has to defeat you, you just have to defend, conserve energy and wait till he tires out etc.

If you are both equal in all ways...it's easier to defend then to attack. So the defending you...should be the one who wins.

If I on the other hand had to attack and kill an exact copy of me to take his place, I would simply do it in a way that prevents the other me from ever knowing an attack is coming. A bullet to the brain suddenly from cover. An arrow to the knee and then a sudden attack with a sword etc. The attacker has a huge advantage is the defender doesn't know an attack is coming. Even if you could only use your bare hands, you could walk up to the other you and act like you are there to save him/her and kill your otherself when he goes to sleep at night or lets his/her guard down etc. That is the best way to take yourself out.
 

doodger

New member
May 19, 2010
166
0
0
Assuming the other me is in the same shape as I am and has no weapon, the first to make a move would probably win because I can't see myself standing after getting kicked in the guts by my evil clone. Wow, that's a lot of I, myself, etc :p
 

elvor0

New member
Sep 8, 2008
2,320
0
0
I have no idea. Assuming this is future me, future me already knows how I would fight, and I would expect future me to fight as I would. I already know what my own reactions would be in that situation. We'd most likely end up jabbing each others eyes out with our keys, or ending up headbutting each other as we attempted to do so. Failing a keyshot, I'd go for a knee to the nuts, (in which case, we'd cancel each other out) after which a jab in the throat is in order, so we'd both end up standing there gasping for air. Presumably if this is future me, I'd recover my breath slightly quicker due to less damage from smoking.

So going through that I /might/ be able to beat myself, but I find it very likely that it would be a laughable stalemate.
 
Sep 13, 2009
1,589
0
0
wulfy42 said:
The Almighty Aardvark said:
Presumably wouldn't the other you also know that though? He is an identical copy, I assume that would be in mind as well as body
It's not an exact copy since he's attacking and your defending (not attacking him). In Judo the attacker is at a serious disadvantage so if everything else is equal, the defender will always win.

As far as knowing all the weaknesses etc, that only works if the other you KNOWS everything that you know including that you and he are the same. In that case you would lose the advantage but it makes less sense for the other you to be attacking you and demanding money etc. Perhaps if it was an alternate you that has to kill you and take your place though...that would make sense.

While judo is an extreme case, most forms of combat (that don't involve guns and often even those that do) give an advantage to the person who does not attack first. You allow the other person to attack which leaves them open after you defend or dodge it. IF the other you also knew this..then he or she would never attack first....but according to the OP he or she IS attacking fist..randomly and without using any special items/abmushes etc to take advantage of being the first attacker.

Finally you have the other minor advantage..which is that if both combatants are equal (completely equal) the one with the larger options will usually win. You don't need to win the fight, or kill your other self, you just need to get away, disable him, tire him out etc. He has to keep attacking you...and has to defeat you, you just have to defend, conserve energy and wait till he tires out etc.

If you are both equal in all ways...it's easier to defend then to attack. So the defending you...should be the one who wins.

If I on the other hand had to attack and kill an exact copy of me to take his place, I would simply do it in a way that prevents the other me from ever knowing an attack is coming. A bullet to the brain suddenly from cover. An arrow to the knee and then a sudden attack with a sword etc. The attacker has a huge advantage is the defender doesn't know an attack is coming. Even if you could only use your bare hands, you could walk up to the other you and act like you are there to save him/her and kill your otherself when he goes to sleep at night or lets his/her guard down etc. That is the best way to take yourself out.
I agree with just about all of that. The only way to take defeat yourself is to exploit whatever difference there is between you two. I briefly considered a strategy involving trying to grab his beard before I reconciled with how ineffective that'd be
 

Ham Blitz

New member
May 28, 2009
576
0
0
Vigormortis said:
Well, let's consider:

More than likely, ruling out dopplegangers, clones, hallucinations, etc, the reason you'd suddenly be facing down a (seemingly older) bearded version of yourself is because your future self went back in time with the intention of mugging you. For whatever reason.

Considering this, if you choose to fight back, we will have one of two scenarios occur.

In one, you will defeat your future self. This will lead to you likely realizing the futility of traveling back in time to mug yourself. Meaning, your future self will never go back. Which leads to a paradox.

In the other, you lose to your future self; who likely walks away gloating about the new found money he took. In this scenario, you may feel a need for revenge. As such, you may end up deciding, at some point in the future, to go back in time and steal the money you lost in your youth. This essentially closes the loop.

In effect, our choices are:

* Win the fight, cause a time paradox
* Lose the fight, allow events to pan out

So...yeah. Losing is really the only option.
I am not sure if this has been said yet and I don't feel like reading through all the posts. Anyway:
Could it not be possible that the future self needed money because he successfully robbed you, thus when you get the point in the future where you are him, you need money, thus you go back and rob yourself... and then the cycle continues.
Moderately short story shorter, you go back in time to rob yourself for money because you are low on money ever since you robbed yourself back in time.