I immediately cry out "We meet again, old friend!" and he will reply with "but this time the advantage is mine!" We will then both laugh, then we'll both go get a beer and reminisce about the good ol' days.
Basically, this.Vigormortis said:Well, let's consider:
More than likely, ruling out dopplegangers, clones, hallucinations, etc, the reason you'd suddenly be facing down a (seemingly older) bearded version of yourself is because your future self went back in time with the intention of mugging you. For whatever reason.
Considering this, if you choose to fight back, we will have one of two scenarios occur.
In one, you will defeat your future self. This will lead to you likely realizing the futility of traveling back in time to mug yourself. Meaning, your future self will never go back. Which leads to a paradox.
In the other, you lose to your future self; who likely walks away gloating about the new found money he took. In this scenario, you may feel a need for revenge. As such, you may end up deciding, at some point in the future, to go back in time and steal the money you lost in your youth. This essentially closes the loop.
In effect, our choices are:
* Win the fight, cause a time paradox
* Lose the fight, allow events to pan out
So...yeah. Losing is really the only option.
Not only that, but even if you were in an open field, assuming that he is exactly as fit as you are he will never be able to close the initial distance. Just keep running until either your doppelganger realizes this and goes to mug someone else, or he dies from starvation. Chances are you'll always reach food first, and provided that reaching down to grab food doesn't slow you down enough to close the distance you'll eventually win. Worst case scenario you both die, but at the very least you're guaranteed to take him with you.Vuliev said:Since I'm a reasonable person, I try to talk myself down first, see why he's resorted to crime. I'm pretty sure that I would know that I wouldn't want to harm myself, so I think I'd listen to reason and listen to what I have to say.
Failing that, it comes down to when I strike first as I would only strike to incapacitate. Or, perhaps, knowing me, I might just step slowly away because I know me, and I'd be too afraid to make a move to take my wallet.
Presumably wouldn't the other you also know that though? He is an identical copy, I assume that would be in mind as well as bodywulfy42 said:The martial art I have specialized the most in is Judo, which is very defensively oriented and relies on an opponent attacking you. Since the other me would be on the offensive, I would have a large advantage and should easily be able to defeat myself.
In addition, most everyone should be able to defeat themselves if only they have realized they are fighting themself (assuming the other you has not realized it yet since they are attacking themself).
If you know how you fight, you'll know how the other you fights, while the other you won't have the same advantage. You'll know all your own weaknesses, while the other you doesn't know the same thing. If you have a bum knee, you could kick the other you's bum knee, if you can't see at all without your glasses, you can knock them off the other you etc.
It's not an exact copy since he's attacking and your defending (not attacking him). In Judo the attacker is at a serious disadvantage so if everything else is equal, the defender will always win.The Almighty Aardvark said:Presumably wouldn't the other you also know that though? He is an identical copy, I assume that would be in mind as well as bodywulfy42 said:The martial art I have specialized the most in is Judo, which is very defensively oriented and relies on an opponent attacking you. Since the other me would be on the offensive, I would have a large advantage and should easily be able to defeat myself.
In addition, most everyone should be able to defeat themselves if only they have realized they are fighting themself (assuming the other you has not realized it yet since they are attacking themself).
If you know how you fight, you'll know how the other you fights, while the other you won't have the same advantage. You'll know all your own weaknesses, while the other you doesn't know the same thing. If you have a bum knee, you could kick the other you's bum knee, if you can't see at all without your glasses, you can knock them off the other you etc.
I agree with just about all of that. The only way to take defeat yourself is to exploit whatever difference there is between you two. I briefly considered a strategy involving trying to grab his beard before I reconciled with how ineffective that'd bewulfy42 said:It's not an exact copy since he's attacking and your defending (not attacking him). In Judo the attacker is at a serious disadvantage so if everything else is equal, the defender will always win.The Almighty Aardvark said:Presumably wouldn't the other you also know that though? He is an identical copy, I assume that would be in mind as well as body
As far as knowing all the weaknesses etc, that only works if the other you KNOWS everything that you know including that you and he are the same. In that case you would lose the advantage but it makes less sense for the other you to be attacking you and demanding money etc. Perhaps if it was an alternate you that has to kill you and take your place though...that would make sense.
While judo is an extreme case, most forms of combat (that don't involve guns and often even those that do) give an advantage to the person who does not attack first. You allow the other person to attack which leaves them open after you defend or dodge it. IF the other you also knew this..then he or she would never attack first....but according to the OP he or she IS attacking fist..randomly and without using any special items/abmushes etc to take advantage of being the first attacker.
Finally you have the other minor advantage..which is that if both combatants are equal (completely equal) the one with the larger options will usually win. You don't need to win the fight, or kill your other self, you just need to get away, disable him, tire him out etc. He has to keep attacking you...and has to defeat you, you just have to defend, conserve energy and wait till he tires out etc.
If you are both equal in all ways...it's easier to defend then to attack. So the defending you...should be the one who wins.
If I on the other hand had to attack and kill an exact copy of me to take his place, I would simply do it in a way that prevents the other me from ever knowing an attack is coming. A bullet to the brain suddenly from cover. An arrow to the knee and then a sudden attack with a sword etc. The attacker has a huge advantage is the defender doesn't know an attack is coming. Even if you could only use your bare hands, you could walk up to the other you and act like you are there to save him/her and kill your otherself when he goes to sleep at night or lets his/her guard down etc. That is the best way to take yourself out.
I am not sure if this has been said yet and I don't feel like reading through all the posts. Anyway:Vigormortis said:Well, let's consider:
More than likely, ruling out dopplegangers, clones, hallucinations, etc, the reason you'd suddenly be facing down a (seemingly older) bearded version of yourself is because your future self went back in time with the intention of mugging you. For whatever reason.
Considering this, if you choose to fight back, we will have one of two scenarios occur.
In one, you will defeat your future self. This will lead to you likely realizing the futility of traveling back in time to mug yourself. Meaning, your future self will never go back. Which leads to a paradox.
In the other, you lose to your future self; who likely walks away gloating about the new found money he took. In this scenario, you may feel a need for revenge. As such, you may end up deciding, at some point in the future, to go back in time and steal the money you lost in your youth. This essentially closes the loop.
In effect, our choices are:
* Win the fight, cause a time paradox
* Lose the fight, allow events to pan out
So...yeah. Losing is really the only option.