Poll: Can you hate gay culture and not be homophobic?

Recommended Videos

Elementary - Dear Watson

RIP Eleuthera, I will miss you
Nov 9, 2010
2,980
0
0
I agree! I have nothing against homosexuals, its their choice at the end of the day, as long as it doesn't interfere with me, then I cant judge. But I hate the flamboyant, OTT, High Pitch lisp thing that some have going! Its annoying! I cant stand it when people deliberately put on voices and constantly talk that way. Impressions are funny, but you dont see impressionists permanetly immitating one specific voice, so why do some gays? Its so fake, and put on, and obviously so! Argh...!
 

Avalanche91

New member
Jan 8, 2009
604
0
0
Gay's are okay, they're just people too. It's the stereotypical 'fabulosity' I can't stand. Thank god not all gays act like that.....or do, but in a less annoying degree.
 

Helmholtz Watson

New member
Nov 7, 2011
2,497
0
0
JesterRaiin said:
But of course.

But here's the question for you - since there's a wide spectrum of what we can call "gayness" : which "gay culture" is considered "mainstream", "canon" and which is offshoot ?
I think the OP was referring to this form of "gay culture":

 

StrangerMouse

New member
May 16, 2010
128
0
0
Oh yes, you most certainly can. I'm an LGBT person myself, and I dislike many aspects of "gay culture."
 

JesterRaiin

New member
Apr 14, 2009
2,286
0
0
Volf99 said:
JesterRaiin said:
But of course.

But here's the question for you - since there's a wide spectrum of what we can call "gayness" : which "gay culture" is considered "mainstream", "canon" and which is offshoot ?
I think the OP was referring to this form of "gay culture":

Lack of precission begets flames. ;)

 

Helmholtz Watson

New member
Nov 7, 2011
2,497
0
0
JesterRaiin said:
Volf99 said:
JesterRaiin said:
But of course.

But here's the question for you - since there's a wide spectrum of what we can call "gayness" : which "gay culture" is considered "mainstream", "canon" and which is offshoot ?
I think the OP was referring to this form of "gay culture":

Lack of precission begets flames. ;)

lol, what did I just watch?
 

DanielBrown

Dangerzone!
Dec 3, 2010
3,838
0
0
I think so.
I've had plenty of gay friends, and I'm not homophobic, but I hate a deep hatred for the Pride festivals here in Stockholm. I wouldn't go around demonstrating how awesome it is that I'm heterosexual, so I don't see the point in them doing it for homosexuality. Especially since they do it in such a disgusting way. When you've seen two 50 year old men, making out, dressed in diapers and covered in baby oil... you don't want to live on this planet anymore.
Those extremely girly gay guys really tick me off as well. Mainly because we're forced to see them through the American media. Fucking Fab 5 who made that acceptable.
 

Farson89

New member
Apr 16, 2009
131
0
0
I dislike anyone who goes out of their way to act like a stereotype, for example I remember a schoolmate of mine coming out of the closet and then mysteriously developing a lisp OVERNIGHT. Fuck that guy.
 

MiracleOfSound

Fight like a Krogan
Jan 3, 2009
17,776
0
0
Yes. In fact I know a couple of gay dudes who can't stand the culture and vibe in gay clubs. I know others who thrive on it.

Everyone's different.
 

garjian

New member
Mar 25, 2009
1,013
0
0
Am Gay.
Cannot stand camp people.

It's rare you see a gay person on American TV, which takes up the majority of our TV, that isn't this disgusting little camp stereotype, flailing his wrists and shoulders around in a top fashion outlet in Paris and flirting with every possible masculine object, just to make sure the audience gets that he's gay. It's pathetic and I am ashamed of you.

is that the "gay culture" you were referring to?
if so, of course it's not homophobic, as it has nothing to do with homosexuality.
Shopping, feminine attributes, musicals, limp wrists and well... all that, have absolutely nothing to do with having sex with men.
 

Danny91

New member
May 30, 2011
131
0
0
Wasn't there a South Park episode where they explained tolerance of gays as being a different thing to just blindly forcing yourself to approve of everything such a minority person would do, for fear of being labeled insensitive? Sorry if I cant remember the details, but it was quite a good one.
 

Harlief

New member
Jul 8, 2009
229
0
0
There are a couple of gay people I've encountered who annoy me with their incessant talking about being gay and having lots of sex, they are just as bad as the douche-bags who talk about how straight and manly they are and how many women they've boned. Douche-bags are douche-bags, gay or straight.
 

Asuka Soryu

New member
Jun 11, 2010
2,437
0
0
I'd say 'no'. It's not that you hate them for being gay. You're hating them for being in your face and annoying.
 

Random berk

New member
Sep 1, 2010
9,636
0
0
I know a couple of gay guys who, athough you immediately know they were gay from listening to them, don't try to make a big deal of it. These guys are a pleasure to talk to. I aalso know another one who tries to act as much like the stereotypical flamboyant homosexual as possible, the manner of speaking, the gestures, he hasn't quite taken to dressing in bright pink, sparkly clothes yet, but at this rateit'll happen. This individual is a massive wanker who I would straight up not tolerate if he tried to communicate with me. Although he is also a cowardly backstabbing scumbag, so thats probably a bigger part of my prejudice against him than the gay thing. Even so, I would always have far more respect for a gay guy who just deals with it like a normal person than I would for one who tries to substitute homosexuality for pesonality.
 

deus-ex-machina

New member
Jan 22, 2010
321
0
0
I live in Brighton, England.

It's definitely possible to live in the gay capital of the UK, be totally comfortable and friendly among gay people, but still dislike a few aspects. I do not mind the Pride Festival here - it's not about forcing it down your throat, it's about celebrating who you are and if that means you have to be fabulous, so be it.

But I do not like drag queens. Not the people who dress up, but their alter egos. Most of the time, they're crass, bitter characters who can't stand 'breeders' - a term I hate. Now I know drag queens are a gross exaggeration of the gay scene, but it's a good example.

I'm quite introverted, so sometimes I do feel uncomfortable around extroverts and sometimes I think this is where a lot of guys tend to dislike gay guys. Maybe I'm wrong, but it's how I figured out my own shyness and discomfort around some gay guys. It's not that they're gay. Even if they would like to sleep with me, I don't care. I think I just don't like being around hugely extroverted people.
 

Terminal Blue

Elite Member
Legacy
Feb 18, 2010
3,933
1,804
118
Country
United Kingdom
sir.rutthed said:
So, are people who like me who don't automatically hate gay people for being gay but don't like the 'in your face' attitude surrounding a large part of that culture homophobic? Or is it acceptable to draw that distinction?
Well, probably yes..

However, the actual meaning of homophobia has been forgotten to a large degree. People who use the word often don't realize that the vast majority of the human race (including many gay people) are homophobic, and it's not really a very bad thing. It's certainly not as bad as being prejudiced or discriminatory.

Now, let's talk about privilege for a second.

A lot of you claim you "don't flaunt" your sexuality. I'll tell you, unless you actively closet yourself (by never being seen with your partners in public, by never describing someone as your wife or girlfriend, by never talking about your children. In short, by deliberately hiding your romantic or personal life altogether, and even then you're not really closeting because no-one will ever assume you're gay without evidence) then you are "flaunting" your sexuality. The reason you don't see yourself as taking part in a "culture" is because that culture is the one we all live in, it's mainstream mass culture.

A gay person has a very clear choice ahead of them, they can not talk about their sexuality, which means being 'closeted' (and often having quite unpleasant social consequences from ultimately being 'outed'), or they can talk openly about it, which means "flaunting" it. Unsurprisingly, the vast majority choose to undergo the scorn of people like those who seem to have descended upon this thread and "flaunt" their sexuality as if it's something worth being proud of, because from an outside perspective it's very easy to see how proud you all are of your sexuality - you tell everyone about it all the time, the only reason you don't see yourself doing it is because 'everyone else' does the same things.

Now, the second thing that really bugs me about this argument.

Why do gay people have to be so different? Why do gay men have to be all flamboyant and camp? Why do gay women often adopt exaggerated 'masculine' (or ultra-feminine) styling or wear piercings? Why do people have to wear leather at pride parades? Why do gay men have to wear makeup? Etc.

The answer, they really don't and if you were to actually involve yourself in a gay lifestyle you'll realize that such people are the tip of the iceberg. However, once again, this is about closeting, these are very useful and easy ways for someone to delineate themselves visually. These tropes are actually, for the most part, based on old stereotypes about gay people (particularly the idea that gay people are by by nature less masculine/feminine, or that this has more to do with them as people than it does with the definition of masculine or feminine).

The interesting thing about those stereotypes is that they highlight a rather weird (when you think about it) conflation which lies pretty close to the root of homophobia, the association between homosexuality and gender non-conformity. I don't want to call the self-conscious adoption of gender non-conformity in the pride movement a conscious protest because it doesn't rely on everyone who does it understanding it, but it is a very political adoption. If there is no room in our culture for a little gender non-conformity, there will never be room for men to have sex with men or women to have sex with women.

So basically, yeah, what are you upset by?

Call me wrong, but the way I interpret your point (and I'm by no means excluding everyone who responded, because some of you badly need to check your insecurity) is that gay people need to shut up and be more 'normal'. Just bear in mind that you live in a world where being "normal" means being "straight", absolutely and by definition. There's no way around that.

For the record, I don't like mainstream gay culture. I'm just not stupid enough to call it 'gay culture' as if there's no way to blend being countercultural with being gay (because, you know, movements like the original 'counterculture', or later punk and goth, modern anime geek culture etc. never provided any kind of shelter for people to be open about their sexuality before Lady Gaga so much as crawled out of the womb). I like mainstream "straight culture" (or "culture", as we call it) even less, but I'm not stupid enough to assume that no straight people feel the same.

But the right to be non-conformist, whether in gender or lifestyle or sexuality. That's something I can get behind, be careful you don't stamp on it.
 

KarlMonster

New member
Mar 10, 2009
393
0
0
"Can you hate gay culture and not be homophobic?"

Yes.

Precisely the same way that I can hate Bluetooth babblers, without being a Luddite.

OK, maybe 'Luddite' is a little off in terms of word relationships, but I feel the allegory still works.
There is nothing prima facie wrong with the technology, its how the technology is used that annoys me.