I would have thought that too, but thinking about it - the genetic combination are less likely to have regressed far from close relatives, than they are from a few degrees of separation.shewolf51 said:Huh, I would've thought that second or third cousin would've been safer because they would be farther apart from their common relative and thus there would be more differences in their genes and wouldn't be so closely related to each other.Gitsnik said:I agree with you. I want to stress that strongly.shewolf51 said:It doesn't matter how much he's seen her or if his half of the family is disowned. They are still related by blood.
In my mind, the idea of sleeping with a family member is EXTREMELY fucked up.
But.
A recalled genetic memory says that rooting the 1st cousin is safer than the 2nd or 3rd. I figure if he's got a rubber and she's cool with it, go nuts. It's creepy and wrong (IMHO), but if they're ok with it - go team (retard).
That is certainly an interesting bit of info.
Ok, I'm terminating this line of thought right now.