I reckon games need to have a balance of at least good gameplay, re-playability, and graphics. And a good story also really helps. There's nothing worse than getting to the end of a game and realizing the story really sucked, or made no sense.
Donnyp said:UBISOFT! Cookie me. I look at a game as Gameplay and story first. Then control and sound. Then "Funfactor" for replayability and finaly Online Fun factor. If a game comes out sporting its BEAUTY i judge that also but only if thats a selling plot.miracleofsound said:I'm a sucker for pretty graphics, yet I have utterly hated some of the best looking games out there because the gameplay was inferior... Assasin's Creed, Far Cry 2 and Prince of Persia 2008 to name a few.
Cookie for anyone who can spot the link between those three...
But I can't imagine I'd have spent 200 hours plus in Cyrodil and the Capital Wasteland had they not been so gorgeous to look at.
Cookies for you both!axia777 said:[
Ubisoft? Do I get cookies?
I also agree with having Bethesda games to good to look at. I love just climbing to the top of a mountain and staring off into the country side. That is just awesome.
Oh yes, I get it. ROFL.MaxTheReaper said:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5XyghKl72R0axia777 said:"Master of Unlocking" scenes? What ever are you talking about?
Oh yeah.
That's real talent.
Huzzah to that!Flying-Emu said:Well Contra's still fun so... I'd say graphics don't matter at all.