No, I see him as a commentator and not a critic. He chooses to (hilariously I might add) focus on the negative aspects of a game and rip those to shreds. To be honest, I never listen to any reviewer who is paid to review games because the amount of games they have to ploay and review makes them not review them as games to have fun and enjoy, but more as an item and if the parts are assembled correctly.
Take this for example, I used to love fried chicken, it was my favorite food and I could eat it anytime. In college I began managing a fried chicken resteraunt, so I was around it 8-12 hrs. a day, six days a week, I couldn't leave the store so my meals consisted of fried chicken and I had it those six days a week sometimes twice a day. Now I can't stand it, I can tell when it's good fried chicken but I won't do more than taste it. That's the way I see reviewers, they know when it's good, but they have been burnt out from having to do it critically for so long they notice every little flaw.
If I want a recommendation, I ask regular people who have played the game for fun and entertainment. That system works best for me. I still read and watch reviews but not for recommendations but for entertainment, especially if it is a scathing review of a horrid game.