No, to form a statistical probability you need some data to form your statistics from, and the data needs to be relevant and checkable. So we can't say life probably exists elsewhere because Hunde Des Krieg wants to be a dog, and we can't say that life probably exists elsewhere because we have found something alive that was not part of the Earthian genome.dagens24 said:There is statistical probability friend. While this doesn't prove anything it does change the odds. If you calculate all everything that is required to sustain life, the probability of it occuring naturally, and then expand to take into account the size of the universe, well the odds for and against change.
That's like saying there is a 50/50 chance god does or does not exist. If I were to say to you that there are dancing pink elephants on pluto that throw pony jams you can't say with 100% that there arn't because you can't provide any evidence against it. What you can do is look at statistical probabilities to reach a logical conclussion.
The only statistic we have is that there is life - here. And that as far as we know there is none anywhere else, with no other variables to include. Number of planets or vastness of space mean nothing until we find something that demonstrates that life has started somewhere else. Until then it is a pure guess, probability and statistics don't come into it.