Yes actually. I try to be helpful and the good guy in most games, with the exclusion of Fable (Original One) Where I was a Bad Guy One Time for the lols, and Red Dead Redemption which for some reason I want to just kill off entire villages.
Creatively evil, you mean. I agree, that's indeed more enjoyable.Miumaru said:It depends. For the most part, no. I prefer being evil on my own terms though.
I always choose what suits me most, now I can be evil by killing random people, sure. But if they've been introduced in the game and therefore actually exist by my standard it comes down to the situation. If the evil action grants me some sort of bonus, or advantage, and whether or not the evil action suits my principles.TheLefty said:This pertains mostly to Fallout 3, Red Dead Redemption and game like that, where you can choose to play good or bad.
I don't mean morally (mostly) but physically difficult. Even if I try, I end up just shifting to good. Unless I'm playing the games wrong, for the most part the only ways to be evil is to randomly kill people, and I always try to play the suave and smooth evil doer (I can't think of any examples at the moment, think James Bond's evil twin if there was one)as opposed to the bloody randomly killing kind. And, yes, I blew up Megaton (once).
But especially in Red Dead, even when I went through a random killing faze, most of the story quests give you +Honor anyway, I just find it difficult.
So I'm wondering if anyone else holds this same evil ineptitude?
(For option two I thought about putting babies instead of human liver...but thought that was just a bit too evil)