dietpeachsnapple said:
Eclectic Dreck said:
I own a single sword that is perfectly capable of killing a similarly armed foe in a duel that I won as a prize in a fencing tournament. I also am in possession of five functional fencing foils at a given moment and enough parts that I could presumably piece together another three.
Are the fencing foils dulled for tournaments, or do you literally have blade tipped swords?
Second, how effective will that be against zombies? (Do you have one with a left and right handle grip for dual wielding purposes?)
A foil has neither edge nor point. Any late age dueling sword only has an edge in order to dissuade one's opponent from grasping the blade. In the place of a point you have a spring loaded steel "button" that acts as a switch for use by the scoring mechanism in a tournament bout.
No dueling sword of late age is designed to be used with a second weapon. The only reason one brings two swords to a battle is because the weapon is too unwieldy to act as an implement of offense and defense simultaneously. A legitimate rapier is one such weapon. At five feet long, the weapon was unwieldy and it is quite difficult to transition from offense to defense and as such was generally used with another implement such as a long dagger, a buckler or even a cloak wrapped around to off hand for defense. While there are certain techniques that leverage both weapons on the offense, in general if the sword CAN work alone, it works BEST alone.
The sword in question is a small sword, and though it possesses an edge of surprising sharpness the light weight of the weapon (less than two pounds) means that it won't remove a limb or any of that jazz. It is, afterall, a thrusting weapon and it does that job marvelously. According to science, a mere pound of force applied to the weapon is enough to drive it through a person (assuming you don't hit bone, which requires a bit more. Considering a lunge can deliver more than 2000 lbs of force (albiet briefly) you realize just how fragile we are).