Poll: Does blood and gore affect how much you enjoy a game?

Recommended Videos

Doinstuffman38

New member
Dec 1, 2009
281
0
0
James Joseph Emerald said:
I actually liked the exploding heads from Gears of War and Fallout, though. Satisfying.
Absolutly. For Gears, the gore makes the game. Normally, I don't care either way if a game has gore or not, but for Gears, I can't imagine it any other way.

Turok (the remake) also had some pretty gory knife kills, which I also didn't mind.
 

Nazulu

They will not take our Fluids
Jun 5, 2008
6,242
0
0
Don't mind, unless it's like organs spilling out or it's so realistic when the blood comes out of someone and they scream in pain.

None of my favourite games have blood in it at all, so I don't see it as important at all.
 

Flying-Emu

New member
Oct 30, 2008
5,367
0
0
I don't really care. Gore is kind of superfluous in my eyes; I don't play the game to see heads and shit explode, I play for the challenge of dropping the enemy. As long as the gore isn't so spectacular as to distract from the gameplay (I DESPISE games that have 'blood splatter' on your HUD), I couldn't give two shits whether it's there or not.
 

KingGolem

New member
Jun 16, 2009
388
0
0
Generally, I only like blood and gore when it's either realistic or in a situation in which all pretense of realism has been dropped. For example, I loved the violence in Prototype, since a mutant super-powered badass could understandably dish out that level of destruction. My favorite bit of Prototype ultraviolence was when I got the streetsweeper power for the tentacle arm, and used it in a densely packed crowd of people. Man...limbs went flying EVERYWHERE! :D Another example of when it's alright is with No More Heroes. Violence is not portrayed realistically at all, so if Travis Touchdown can survive crap that would kill a terminator, it's actually less unrealistic that his bi-sected enemies should fill the screen with clouds of blood (and coins, but whatever).

However, an instance where it is not okay is when unrealistic violence is inserted into an otherwise fairly serious game. Fallout 3 is usually somewhat compliant with the laws of physics, but when using realistic weapons on realistic human enemies, a shot in the middle of the head should NOT decapitate a person and send their head flying off in three different directions. You know, a human head shot with a high-powered assault rifle might split open, sure, but it's not going to go flying. Human necks are made of bone and muscle, not whipped cream. It's even worse when this happens with a laser, you know, LIGHT, somehow imparting force equivalent to the kick of an NFL star.
 

Eggsnham

New member
Apr 29, 2009
4,054
0
0
Yep, I love a good blood soaked gore fest.

For me, violent videogames are a way of relieving stress and doing things that I couldn't normally do anywhere else in life, whether or not I would actually want to.

A game doesn't NEED gore for me to enjoy it, but I loves me some miscellaneous body parts and organs spilled all over the floor.
 

crudus

New member
Oct 20, 2008
4,415
0
0
If it is used to increase the atmosphere then blood and gore are a good thing. Otherwise I don't think I would care.
 

Baron von Blitztank

New member
May 7, 2010
2,133
0
0
I love a bloodbath. Add blood, organs, screams of terror, decaptitations, dismemberment, etc. It's all good!

But as much as I love blood and guts, I don't find it necessary for a game to be enjoyable I.E Transformers: War for Cybertron (Which can't have blood), Uncharted (which has blood splashes) and Assassin's Creed (which has blood splashes but gory counterattacks, especially with the hidden blade/s).
However if you took said good game and ramp up the gore in a realistic way. I will not complain.
 

DarkhoIlow

New member
Dec 31, 2009
2,531
0
0
I choose the third option,since I enjoy gore no matter how violent it might be (i.e: Dead space is a good example)and other games that cannot have or don't have it implemented are enjoyable for me as well.
 

Prof. Monkeypox

New member
Mar 17, 2010
1,014
0
0
I don't always see the point of excess gore, but if a game is good, it's good. Ultimately, that's the only important factor.
 

Le_Lisra

norwegian cat
Jun 6, 2009
693
0
0
Not really, but it can be a nice addition. Fragfests like Painkiller would be considerably less fun without a nice, soaky damage model, and if you couldn't nail enemies to walls in FEAR, I'd never finished that game.

On the whole though.. I don't really care. If games solely focus on the violence, though, that makes me kind of uneasy.
 

Dfskelleton

New member
Apr 6, 2010
2,851
0
0
I enjoy violent games, and if you can make the bad guys heads explode then it's generally win (except Jericho, I just sold it for 2 dollars which I used to buy HAWX. GOOD TRADE.) However, I do enjoy non violent games as well.
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,909
0
0
Generally speaking when it comes to action games with violence I like to see it properly represented. In many cases this includes very gory violence.

Given that I'm 34 and most of the games I enjoy involve a lot of fighting and fairly adult subject matter I tend to get irritated when a company winds up pulling their punches when it comes to violence, and also sex which I feel is entertwined with it as far as ratings and such go.

Now, one point I will make despite my selection (which was the closest I could come to my opinion) is that sometimes less is more when it comes to violence. One of the problems I have with a lot of games that get "ultraviolent" is that they exagerrate things to a ridiculous and cartoony extreme of the sort you might see in a movie like "Haunted World Of El Superbeasto" or some of the Adult Swim fare which is arguably almost as bad as cutting it since exagerrating it to an unbelievable extreme hurts immersion the same way. Exploding heads, high pressure blood spurts from unlikely locations, and other things might be "fun" int he right context but don't always fit in with games when they try and be realistic. Indeed some of the most grueling examples of violence in movies come from films that try and show fairly realistically what something would look like, rather than having every once of blood in the body come spurting out with some fleshy chunks when it wouldn't be appropriate.

I've long been a proponent where making the gore too cartoony should ultimatly lower something's rating rather than raise it.
 

Aesthetical Quietus

New member
Mar 4, 2009
402
0
0
I love exploring the gore, it gets old after a while though. So I voted neutral. The game has to be engaging, but having cool gory effects never go amiss.
 

Xpwn3ntial

Avid Reader
Dec 22, 2008
8,023
0
0
I don't care how much gore is in a game, but if it seems like the creators actively tried to limit it, I won't enjoy it as much.
 

ScruffyTheJanitor

New member
Jul 17, 2009
256
0
0
So long as it's not made just to look gory, I don't mind. I mean, if a train runs you over and you get put through a meat grinder, I'd be ok with the fact that there's enough gore to fill a jacuzzi. But when you put a tiny cut into someone and it spills their guts out, it just seems stupid.
 

Vibhor

New member
Aug 4, 2010
714
0
0
Blood and gore lets me vent out some frustation but nothing else
I could only enjoy the gore in fallout 3 a little but that was the only thing that kept me playing the game as I thought better weapons=more gore but it seems that even a 9mm pistol can asplode a super mutant
And another thing
When in AC2 ezio got his hidden knife there was a cutscene in which leonardo jokingly "cuts off"
ezio's finger.In that scene I actually closed my eyes just so that I wouldnt have to see the gore.So I guess it depends on the game as I really liked postal 2
 

McMarbles

New member
May 7, 2009
1,566
0
0
I can safely say that there's nothing on Earth that matters LESS to me when it comes to enjoying a game.