Graustein said:
akmarksman said:
I was the 5th person to vote yes.
Can you give us a reason for your viewpoint?
In my part of America..Alaska that is..you might have heard about Alaska..we had our Governor run for Vice President..
In Alaska,there are shitloads of pickups and drunk males to drive those aforementioned pickups.
Not everyone here can afford to drive a pickup..some might drive a fuel efficient jeep or a subaru..so when those drunk bastards are out,breaking the law..there's a good chance that they will hit someone and possibly kill them or maim them real good..while the inebriated shit usually ends up with maybe a scratch.
If a law like that were to be passed here..part of me would feel that it is a violation in some way..but then again driving is a PRIVILEGE,not a right.
I'm 27 and have never drove while sleepy,or drunk or high. Hell I don't even drink or do drugs,but I'm at the mercy of one of these worthless shits who think it's fun to go barreling down the road going 60MPH in a 35MPH zone.My dad drives a semi during the end of the normal working hours(he leaves for work around 5PM) and he usually gets home around 11PM-midnight and some nights we drive to town to get food or to get the mail.
There's probably a study showing that the large majority of drunk drivers are males,age 20-25 and thereby making it illegal for them to drive a vehicle after a specific time would save lives..I can't argue with those findings because I've seen the results of drunk driving.It ain't pretty.