whitelabel2k said:
Artemis923 said:
whitelabel2k said:
Artemis923 said:
whitelabel2k said:
Artemis923 said:
Drugs are lame.
The people who use drugs are lame.
The fact that everyone assumes that the 19 year old guys gettin Mt Dews at 4 am are on drugs is lame.
The huge "cool factor" that drugs play in our pop culure is lame.
Kids that think drugs are cool are lame.
Drugs are lame.
At no time do you give a reason as to why these things are lame. The guy above you gave an opinion coupled with a fact, seemingly to move the debate onward. You swan in and join the likes of Rutawitz and Nazulu with an opinion based on anecdotal evidence or your own bias.
Who the hell says I need to give evidence for my own opinion? I don't like drugs, end of story.
And if you have just said that that, instead of calling people who LIKE certain drugs lame I would be fine with that. But you've just declared yourself against a whole swathe of society. The whole people who use drugs are lame thing only works if you're up for tossing out half your mp3s. As Bill Hicks said, "Drugs have done good things for us. If you don;t believe me then take all your records, tapes and CDs and burn them. Cos you know what? The musicians that made that great music that has enhanced your lives throughout the years, REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL high on drugs"
1) I don't give a fig what you're "fine with".
2) The opinions of a drug crazed society mean precisely DICK to me.
3) You have no knowledge of my musical tastes, nor of the personal lives of the musicians. You go by ASSUMPTION, a poor choice for what you believe is a logical argument.
4) I could care less what Bill Hicks has to say.
5) You have wasted minutes of my life with your pro-drug garble. Go find someone else to bother, you troll.
Its hardly trolling if you want to open up a fair and balanced debate is it?
Trolling would be making sweeping generalizations. A drug CRAZED society eh? crikey. Obviously no one intelligent has EVER done drugs and they have never had ANY positive effects on the world. This applies to you too Searanox. Its the close mindedness thats annoying, the willingness to accept existing anecdotal evidence as fact.
Also, the musical tastes thing IS a logical movement, it proves that for a large amount of society drugs have had a positive outcome. Terribly sorry I've wasted your time with reasoned argument, at no point lowering myself to personal slights against you.
Cock.
Dude.
Drop it. You're not going to change my mind, and with each post your idiocy shines through.
"Obviously no one intelligent has EVER done drugs and they have never had ANY positive effects on the world."
You must have read the wrong post, because I said nothing of the sort.
"Its the close mindedness thats annoying, the willingness to accept existing anecdotal evidence as fact."
Your obvious bias is also absurdly annoying. You have shown no such evidence either.
"Also, the musical tastes thing IS a logical movement, it proves that for a large amount of society drugs have had a positive outcome."
Re-read my sentence: "You go by ASSUMPTION, a poor choice for what you believe is a logical argument."
It has NOTHING to do with music, so trying to use your "musical tastes thing" to counter-argue does nothing. I said nothing about my musical taste being logical. I said ASSUMPTION IS A POOR CHOICE FOR A LOGICAL ARGUMENT. Did you read it this time?
Furthermore, you have shown nothing to prove your claims that "...a large amount of society drugs have had a positive outcome...". Unless you can somehow PROVE that the musicians that I listen to are all doing drugs. Good luck with that.
And once again, you have successfully wasted my time. You should work on your writing technique. My eight year old sister could form a more cohesive argument than you have.
