Poll: Fallout 4 or Elder Scrolls V?

[darksakul]

I rather say Nether.

 

[Char-Nobyl]

I suppose we're not going to get a 'both' option? Because it's not like they're similar enough to force you to decide between the two.

 

[Darmort]

Fallout 4.
Provided they don't make any of the mistakes in Fallout 3 again (such as the bad voice acting, poor combat mechanic that was broken and a main character I didn't care about).

That said, I found both Fallout 3 and Oblivion (and Morrowind) to be incredibly overhyped by anyone who played them, and I discarded them after about four-seven hours each. Nothing there to keep me interested.

 

[tehroc]

I absolutely HATED Fallout 3, every location was the same as next. The voice acting was (as usual for Bethesda though) absolutely horrible. The leveling system was several steps back from Oblivion. Every thing that made Fallout 1 and 2 so great (the humour) was missing from FO3. Bethesda puts out a pretty well made game by most often the games lack soul.

 

[Sgt Doom]

I want a better magic system, and a fixed leveling system.


[HEADING=2]And more Dark Brotherhood.[/HEADING]

Summed up my thoughts perfectly. Though i'd also like to see Bethesda pay their QA department in more than dried peas and tissue paper.

 

[whaleswiththumbs]

I'm stoked for New Vegas(Fallout).

I'd want something new altogether, Meaning yeah a Fallout game. But, I want a new setting, we have already been to Alaska, the desert area of the western US, D.C. And philly, prob more I'm just not thinking. I would say maybe New York, but that would obviously be a big target in a nuclear war(so the fact that D.C. is still standing is amazing to me.). I'm thinking the plains area of the states, although thats obivously less building/content fillled so you might have to make some stuff up. of course you can always hit the international world, and lets see no EAstern Europe, STALKER has taken that. I'd say France maybe. The beautiful parisian hills and coasts contrasting with there new hlaf-bombed out paint coating, Of course Montenegro is also very beautiful, but I wouldn't want to go mountain climbing i left Megaton.

 

[Avatar Roku]

Oblivion was so full of color and life and frolicking little woodland mammals, while Fallout was so depressing and bleak... I'm going to have to go with TES V.

Well, that's the thing. Depressing can be good if you're in that kind of mood.

While I personally preferred Fallout 3 to Oblivion (by a small margin, for the record), I think that it would be best to get the next Elder Scrolls game first. Way I see it, there's been more innovation since Oblivion than there has been since Fallout, so getting an ES game first would seem fresher.

Well, when you think about it, if you want to talk about innovation in the Fallout franchise, Fallout went completely in a different direction with the third installment with a total overhaul and redesigned gameplay. I mean, we went from turn-based tactical gameplay to an action-packed RPG with FPS elements.

But, in all honesty, I really feel that Fallout 3 was more of a successor to the Elder Scrolls series. Sure completely different story and setting, but they were just too similar in my book, both with hit and miss features.

So, what I'm really asking is if you want the perfect post-apocalyptic RPG or the perfect fantasy RPG.

You misunderstand me. I'm saying that, since Fallout was the most recent of the Bethesda games, there has been more innovation to their format. Therefore, an ES game will seem more fresh, as it will take those innovations and then some, whereas a new FO game by them might just seem like Fallout 3.5.

 

[thiosk]

I want a better magic system, and a fixed leveling system.


[HEADING=2]And more Dark Brotherhood.[/HEADING]

More like

[HEADING=3]The Dark Brotherhood: Scrolls of the Elders[/HEADING]

Was my favorite by a large margin as well.

 

[reg42]

I liked TES for having your race actually influence gameplay

 

[mikecoulter]

Neither! ¬_¬

I'm pretty sure out of the two, Elder Scrolls is more to my liking, but I still despise them.

 

[GreyFox389]

If they made an Oblivion version of Morrowind I'd pick that, but they'd never do that so I pick another Fallout game.

 

[ItsAPaul]

I would say Fallout 4, but I'd rather Elder Scrolls 5 come out and Fallout 4 be an improvement on it like this last go around. Me thinks that'll be the order they release in anyway.

 

[deewank]

Im hoping for another fallout

 

[aarontg]

They have already done fallout so I think they should concentrate on refining elderscrolls befor going straight into fallout again, one thing to change of course is the hipnotized eye contact syndrome.

 

[Pimppeter2]

TES: V will conquer my life, health, and free will.

 

[KiLl_RoY]

FALLOUT!!!!!!!
oblivion figting system sucks big time.

 

[Kyber]

i loved so much EC IV that i want see V

 

[Vkmies]

None. The elder scrolls went downhill after morrowind. It was the last awesomelly epic elder scrolls. And they pretty much ruined fallout for me with the third installment.

So unless they make fallout like the black isle used to do it or the new elder scrolls like morrowind was made then bethesda can go and jump from a cliff all i care.

 

[Remleiz]

Neither, Skies of Arcadia 2 should be made first

 

[osric90]

Elder Scrolls if they sort out the million hits to kill one enemy after like level 8. Fallout can't really be made into much more, if they go with the same post apocalyptic theme.