I avoided this topic for a few days because I didn't want to get involved. I suppose that was foolish. Because now, instead of that, you get a post that took up 5 pages of a word document, and the better part of half an hour to make. I should channel that energy into something more efficent than internet debates, like watching grass grow, but oh well. It was certainly a cathartic sort of fun to make. Good luck finding where you're quoted, everyone.
Wintermute_ said:
for years, I have prayed to the Nintendo overlords, God, and even the FSM, for a Pokemon RPG.
YES! and while play as a trainer might be ok, I want to play as a pokemon! Pick your pokemon, lvl up by fighting other pokemon and players, and eliminate the trainers from the equation. Just pokemon in a pokemon environment. Kinda like dungeon quest if dungeon quest wasn't piss...
Perhaps you should listen to the answer then? Pokemon Mystery Dungeon, which is precisely what you are describing, has been around since the GBA.
Ih8pkmn said:
<---- my user
It has to die. It sucks, and has sucked since the 3rd generation.
Uh-hu. thanks very much for the reasonable, well thought out arguements explaining the inherent flaws within the later pokemon games and why the series should be ended. Oh wait. You didn't have any of that. Sorry, must have misread your post. Now all I can see is unfounded complaining with no backing or legitimacy behind it. Terrible troll is terrible?

Give me your reasons for it's faults. I am positive they have counterpoints.
The Procrastinated End said:
I'd rather they stopped whoring out a staple of my childhood but if people are still enjoying it they can keep going for as long as they want.
Perhaps you are looking at it in the wrong light, in this case. You consider it whoring out your childhood, yet someone in your life would have paid for you to enjoy it, correct? Now other children get to enjoy something of similar/better quality because they continue the series and learn from previous titles. So maybe, opposed to whoring out your childhood, they're simply giving more kids one?
Nazulu said:
Agreed. It has gone on for too long now, it really is abuse. They don't do anything really special with the new games, just pump the same shit out over and over and it's really sad. Also, everyone knows the new Pokemon suck compared to the originals, almost everything about these new games are pathetic.
Are you seriously arguing that Lucario is a worse designed pokemon than Jynx? And please, if you're going to make baseless accusations, do me a favour and forget that grammar and spelling exist, because it makes it easier for me to mock you, opposed to actually refuting your claims.
So let's look at a basic overview of the Pokemon Games, shall we?
FIRST GENERATION; RED, BLUE, YELLOW.
Pokemon is introduced, with 151 critters included. The battle system, trading, collecting pokemon; all there, all in their infancy. The battle mechanics have a myraid of flaws, like critical hits that can do less damage then regular attacks (boosted attack is not included when a critical lands, so a critical hit from something with +3 attack does a mere +2, less damage.), psychic types are overpowered gods of the game (special attack and special defense were combined as one type, and the only pokemon psychics were weak against were terrible themselves), you had a very limited amount of space for items and the games could glitch up in any number of ways.
SECOND GENERATION; GOLD, SILVER, CRYSTAL
We get more new beasts to nerd out over. A special defense stat is introduced, as well as two new types which radically overhaul the battle system, along with hold items. Breeding is introduced, making trading and collecting pokemon easier for groups of friends to manage together. A much larger world is put into the games, allowing longer play time with more side quests and places to explore.
THIRD GENERATION; RUBY, SAPPHIRE, EMERALD
New pokemon with new and interesting type combinations. Dive and the Mach/Acro Bikes make huge changes to how players can explore the world. Natures radically alter how pokemon are raised. Although smaller than the Kanto games, there is large world with plenty to explore. Pokemon designs remain both interesting (Tropius) and occassionally disastrous (Luvdisc). More hold items, more moves and abilities change the battle system and see the rise of heavily compeditive gameplay.
FOURTH GENERATION; DIAMOND, PEARL, PLATINUM
More pokemon! Sweet! Also, the biggest and most influencial change to the basic mechanics of battle remake the compeditive scene, The Physical Special Split. (Previously, attacks used Physical or Special strength based of the type. After the split, the move itself determined whether a move was physical or special. It changed the way the game worked; suddenly Gyarados was a true force with Waterfall, a physical water move, to nominate but one example.) Players can trade wirelessly online and in person, use the underground to kill time and collect rare items, go hunting for the 14 different legendaries, or play in the non combat focused contests. Bucketloads of content in all directions.
FIFTH GENERATION; BLACK, WHITE
Who the hell can guess?
I contest you to provide evidence of deteriorating quality in the games, a lack of originality and developer interest. Pokemon has grown exponentially with each and every installment. Learn about what you condemn before you get nailed to the wall with it mate.
Wintermute_ said:
And the new pokemon, not necessarily the games, just look ridiculous and just suck.
Case in point Voltorb -> Electrode, Grimer -> Muk, Doduo -> Dodrio, ... wait ...
Jellly said:
They need to do something different and change up the game, Its like they really don't care that it is totally the same game if It make money. At least with Zelda and Mario they do change it (sometimes).
Why change the game when the very model for the series is to attract a new demographic of young children each release? It's a completely new and exciting thing for them. And if some of the kids from older demographics hang around, well that's just super.
NinjaCat said:
Pokemon isn't nearly as good as it used to be and it might just need to be Old Yeller'd. Although, a few of the new Pokemon do appeal to me. Plus, as long as Nintendo can make a good profit off it, it'll continue... Possibly forever.
Lazy quote is a lazy quote. Look up. Read that essay. Can't be bothered making a second.
MrJohnson said:
I don't know, I think they're definitely running out of pokemon ideas. In the last generation some of them were just animated objects/the majority were, or just repainted other pokemon.
*Yawn*. Muk, Dodrio, yadda yadda yadda. Every generation has had lazy ideas. Every generation has had awesome ideas. Hush now, or I'll add another paragraph listing some for each generation.
Turbo_Destructor said:
Firstly, hire a decent designer to actually make some cool looking pokemon again. We haven't had any decent pokemon since arguably Johto (some do not even like these ones).
*Sigh* I suppose this is nessecary. Cool looking pokemon? I'll ignore 5th generation so far, because I'm keeping my knowledge of it to a minumum until I play them myself. Okay, so you like 1st and 2nd generation? Well, introducing you to, the all start line up of 3rd! *Also, no idea how to put the link into the text, so just for fun, you also get a big ugly link at the end of each.
Blaziken! http://www.serebii.net/pokedex-dp/257.shtml
Shedinja! http://www.serebii.net/pokedex-dp/292.shtml
Sableye! http://www.serebii.net/pokedex-dp/302.shtml
Aggron! http://www.serebii.net/pokedex-dp/306.shtml
Tropius! (I mean look at it, it is the almighty Tropius!) http://www.serebii.net/pokedex-dp/357.shtml
That's 5, taken by my own preference from within the 3rd gen. I could easily have gotten up to 30 based on fully non-legendaries alone, discounting cool pokemon like Vibrava and Jirachi.
Now for Sinnoh, the 4th gen! Again, I will be (slightly) kind and only display 5 fully evolved regular 'mons.
Luxray! http://www.serebii.net/pokedex-dp/405.shtml
Floatzel! http://www.serebii.net/pokedex-dp/419.shtml
Drifblim! http://www.serebii.net/pokedex-dp/426.shtml
Lucario! http://www.serebii.net/pokedex-dp/448.shtml
Abomansnow! http://www.serebii.net/pokedex-dp/460.shtml
Wow, you're right. They all look terrible. No, wait. They look fine. Yes, it is subjective, but is a bronciosarus with banana's growing from its neck and frond wings any less awesome than a mouse with electricity in its cheeks? Didn't think so.
Hedberger said:
I stopped paying attention to it after the last proper Pokemon IE Gold/Silver/Crystal
I didn't quote you to really answer anything you said, beyond that giving no evidence on an unsubstansiated and frankly stupid claim makes you look foolish too. No, I quoted you as a punishment for that claim. Have fun being quoted in this mammoth of a post!