Poll: Female babysitter charged for having sex with 14-year old boy.

[Delicious Anathema]

*Envy*

 

[FirmartheTrilby]

Lucky kid...

 

[FamoFunk]

Jail.
All hell would break lose if the 20yo was a Male and 14yo a Female. It's no different this way around, She, from what has been published, knew what She was doing and after.

 

[Vrach]

Consentual sex, no crime here as far as I can see. No, not saying it because she's hot and not saying it because the younger person is a male. I know girls who've had sex at that age with a guy who was 19, big whoop, they both wanted it, it's their choice.

The crime was statutory rape the boy was 14 and thus under the age of consent.

Thanks for telling me what I already know, it doesn't change the fact that I don't see it as a crime or something at all bad. If she got him drunk/incapacitated or otherwise raped him, it'd be wrong, yes, but I am of the opinion that a 14 year old human being has more than enough reason in them to make a decision of whether or not they wanna have sex.

It doesn?t really matter what your opinion is that slut still committed a crime and must be punished same as any other criminal.

Oh, you're one of those people >.>

What do you mean one of those people?

People who don't put any personal thought into a situation, instead hiding behind things like rules, law, religion and similar. Oh and those people who call others "slut" for having sex.

 

[bakan]

Where did I say child abuse leads to faster maturing Oo?

It is just that we have better food these days and evolve to be physically and in the end mentally more mature in less time.

You do realize that the ages at which people lose their virginity, finish their education, get a job, have children, get married, retire etc. are only going up?

As people grow older and our society gets more advanced childhood is lasting longer and longer. Where previously children as early as twelve got married, had jobs and even got children all of these things now often happen after 25 or even over 30.

And as we learn more and more about psychology and the human brain we realize that there are brain regions which do not fully mature until 30 and that until the end of puberty there's an insane amount of change and development going on in our brains. We learn that those parts of the brain that deal with responsibility, conscience and long-term consequences do not fully mature and function until after 20 years.

We're not getting mentally mature faster. On the contrary, we're only starting to realize how long it takes for people to become fully mentally mature.

It doesn't change the fact that children mature faster, having sex later comes due to education and social background.

 

[Peteron]

Nice going kid! He must have amazing persuasion skills!

 

[orangeban]

Consentual sex, no crime here as far as I can see. No, not saying it because she's hot and not saying it because the younger person is a male. I know girls who've had sex at that age with a guy who was 19, big whoop, they both wanted it, it's their choice.

The crime was statutory rape the boy was 14 and thus under the age of consent.

Thanks for telling me what I already know, it doesn't change the fact that I don't see it as a crime or something at all bad. If she got him drunk/incapacitated or otherwise raped him, it'd be wrong, yes, but I am of the opinion that a 14 year old human being has more than enough reason in them to make a decision of whether or not they wanna have sex.

It doesn?t really matter what your opinion is that slut still committed a crime and must be punished same as any other criminal.

Oh, you're one of those people >.>

What do you mean one of those people?

People who don't put any personal thought into a situation, instead hiding behind things like rules, law, religion and similar. Oh and those people who call others "slut" for having sex.

I don't agree with calling the girl a "slut" (I think that word should be abolished) but here's the thing, she broke laws, law-breakers get punished. That's how it works, and that's how it's gonna have to work here.

 

[Mr. Google]

Go directly to jail[footnote]After the trial, of course[/footnote]. Do not pass Go. Do not collect $200. Bonus of sex offender registry from community chest.

This is what a fourteen year old boy looks like (Not the one from this case, from another):
http://wwwimage.cbsnews.com/images/2009/06/11/image5082228x.jpg

Do you honestly think 20 year olds of any sex should be fucking that?

God you ruined it. If he didn't look like a baby then it would be acceptable. But she obviously has some sorta weird...fetish i guess? not sure what the right term would be. As a 15 year old if that girl wanted to bone it would be different im 5' 10", 200 pounds. I dont look 13 I look 16.

 

[Inuprince]

If the edit is true, then what are we talking about, we can drop this rape talk, because it seems that they were both interested in each other, - okay there's still the age gap - but it's the same case, with each one of these stories - the one complaining about it, is someone from the family. The boy didn't go to the cops and go - "oh please help, this hot chick wants to have sex with me". Seriously I am not saying this, because the girl looks good, it's just that the boy would have probably wanted it when sober, so if the girl really used alcohol to convince him, then she really is stupid, but I doubt the guy would have regretted it afterwards.

There is another twist to this, for those saying - what if the guy was the older one. In that scenario,there could also be the possibility that it was the girl who tried to get it on with the guy and getting him drunk and etc.(since in today's world even that wouldn't be surprising) - would we be calling the guy the "victim"? I think people would be saying "oh, he probably didn't need much motivation" - and call the guy the "offender" in all scenario's when the male is the older.

TL,DR: If they both wanted each other as seen in the edit, and no one is hurt, + the "victim" isn't complaining, then no other family member should go to the police. Settle things at home by talking it over.End of story.

 

[Olorune]

Damn! Where were all these sexed-up babysitters and teachers when I was in school?!?!Just kidding...no I'm not. No, but seriously, while there is a kind of small age difference, I just don't think that justifies her really sleeping with a 14 year old. He might have game and they might really like each other, but maybe wait until he's old enough to gain more of an understanding of the complications the situation may bring.

 

[Cavouku]

...Ignoring my own moral compass for a moment, this is, to at least some extent, manipulation for sex, if nothing else. I don't even trust myself to make smart sexual decisions yet, and I'm 16. At 14 I wouldn't trust myself with knowing half the porn sites I do, let alone a 20-year-old girl who is fully willing to bone a minor. And get him drunk.

Even if he was consenting, she was... providing services she wasn't supposed to. Those services being sex and booze, and no matter how much the kid would've liked both, there are laws that say neigh, and I feel those laws are not really bad laws.

She committed crimes. I don't know the correct legal terms for all of them, nor how long she would get in prison, or rehab, or wherever the hell they send her, but I do feel that a punishment of some sort is required, and if it happens to make her less manipulative of the young (and horny) boys everywhere, well that's just peachy.

EDIT: If anything, this just offers the chance to say that even at 20, ones judgment can be absolutely dreadful, but let's treat this as an individual thing. She had bad judgment, he had bad judgment (this was going to get out, and someone was going to bring it up to the police). People tend to have bad judgment. But I will say that I think there's an age factor, i.e., teenagers such as myself have a few more chemicals running through them, and I think it reflects badly when we try to deny that and say we're totally mature already.

If you're pretty mature at 15, and able to make smart decisions, imagine how much smarter those decisions will be when you're 19-21.

 

[Mr. Google]

Remember back when there was another case of female teachers having sex with male students coming out every other week? As horrible as it was, the test for guilty or not guilty really did come down to, is she hot or not? Some sort of double standard 'Can't rape the willing' thing. Which, unfortunately, makes perfect sense to me.

If the kid really is pressing charges himself, then, well, ya, rape is rape. But from the sounds of it, it isn't the kid pressing charges.

The story just has weird all over it though, so I can't really form a proper opinion on it. However, I did vote that she should be executed. Mostly for making that stupid duckface while taking a picture of herself in front of a mirror, I mean, come on...people still do that?

Yeah i think in these situations it should be the kids choice to press charges not the parents. You can't really say that he didn't know what was going on. This had been going on for a few months as the article states. And if I was a 14 year old with that baby sitter I'd of been fapping to her a long time ago. On the Duck Face though she seemed to not 100% it so i feel its more acceptable. Looks more like she was clenching her mouth together as to not smile haha.

 

[bakan]

Consentual sex, no crime here as far as I can see. No, not saying it because she's hot and not saying it because the younger person is a male. I know girls who've had sex at that age with a guy who was 19, big whoop, they both wanted it, it's their choice.

The crime was statutory rape the boy was 14 and thus under the age of consent.

Thanks for telling me what I already know, it doesn't change the fact that I don't see it as a crime or something at all bad. If she got him drunk/incapacitated or otherwise raped him, it'd be wrong, yes, but I am of the opinion that a 14 year old human being has more than enough reason in them to make a decision of whether or not they wanna have sex.

It doesn?t really matter what your opinion is that slut still committed a crime and must be punished same as any other criminal.

Oh, you're one of those people >.>

What do you mean one of those people?

People who don't put any personal thought into a situation, instead hiding behind things like rules, law, religion and similar. Oh and those people who call others "slut" for having sex.

I have personnel beliefs. I believe that when you do wrong (and what she did is wrong) you must face the consequences. And I don't think she's a slut because she had sex I think she's a slut because she had sex with a 14 year old boy.

Personal beliefs like overzealous relgious nuts have?
Every transgression has to be seen in context that's why law is more like a guide line which can be changed.

 

[orangeban]

Remember back when there was another case of female teachers having sex with male students coming out every other week? As horrible as it was, the test for guilty or not guilty really did come down to, is she hot or not? Some sort of double standard 'Can't rape the willing' thing. Which, unfortunately, makes perfect sense to me.

If the kid really is pressing charges himself, then, well, ya, rape is rape. But from the sounds of it, it isn't the kid pressing charges.

The story just has weird all over it though, so I can't really form a proper opinion on it. However, I did vote that she should be executed. Mostly for making that stupid duckface while taking a picture of herself in front of a mirror, I mean, come on...people still do that?

Yeah i think in these situations it should be the kids choice to press charges not the parents.

Forgetting the whole sex thing, she still provided him with alchohol, so I think the parents were in their rights to report her (like how someone might report their friends drug dealer.)

 

[orangeban]

Consentual sex, no crime here as far as I can see. No, not saying it because she's hot and not saying it because the younger person is a male. I know girls who've had sex at that age with a guy who was 19, big whoop, they both wanted it, it's their choice.

The crime was statutory rape the boy was 14 and thus under the age of consent.

Thanks for telling me what I already know, it doesn't change the fact that I don't see it as a crime or something at all bad. If she got him drunk/incapacitated or otherwise raped him, it'd be wrong, yes, but I am of the opinion that a 14 year old human being has more than enough reason in them to make a decision of whether or not they wanna have sex.

It doesn?t really matter what your opinion is that slut still committed a crime and must be punished same as any other criminal.

Oh, you're one of those people >.>

What do you mean one of those people?

People who don't put any personal thought into a situation, instead hiding behind things like rules, law, religion and similar. Oh and those people who call others "slut" for having sex.

I have personnel beliefs. I believe that when you do wrong (and what she did is wrong) you must face the consequences. And I don't think she's a slut because she had sex I think she's a slut because she had sex with a 14 year old boy.

Personal beliefs like overzealous relgious nuts have?
Every transgression has to be seen in context that's why law is more like a guide line which can be changed.

Can there be a revised Godwin's Law about accusing someone of being a religious zealot?

 

[Mr. Google]

Forgetting the whole sex thing, she still provided him with alchohol, so I think the parents were in their rights to report her (like how someone might report their friends drug dealer.)

Yeah I can agree with that. Getting the kid drunk is a no-no that the parents had every right to press charges on.

 

[Totenkopf]

Death by the blade.
Ignoring all hypocrisy and double standards, disregarding all the phoney "special circumstances",
I would like to send a clear message against child molestation.
(Yes, I've read the whole OP with edit, I still don't care. You have to be systematic here)

 

[HerbertTheHamster]

Head straight to Gulag

do not come back