Poll: Gay marriage- your thoughts?

Recommended Videos

Chibz

New member
Sep 12, 2008
2,158
0
0
My point is that David Popescu's actions are almost unheard of up here. This is why it was so shocking.
 
Mar 12, 2009
915
0
0
I don't see why they're making such a fuss over it when civil partnerships are exactly the same as a marriage in legal terms but if they want full marriage rights I'm not going to stop them from getting it.
 

ae86gamer

New member
Mar 10, 2009
9,009
0
0
i dont see what the big deal is. There are a lot of people who say gay people getting married is wrong, like if its hurting them or something. I think that as long as two people are in love it shouldnt matter if their gay, straight, or bi. I think that everyone deserves to get married. 50% of marriages end up in divorce. And there are people out there even knowing this statistic that want to get married and stay together but they cant because the government saids its wrong. Just let them get married and be happy.
 

confernal

New member
Feb 5, 2009
207
0
0
Correct we don't know the possible conquences off letting homosexuals rasing childern... but too simply do somthing even though we don't know what will happen has rarely served humanity well in the past(only rarely has somthing good come of this) like using fossil fuels or antibotics. Maybe homosexuals rasing childern will make them more understanding and less stereotypical of what males should do and what females should do, in that case it's a positive force that will improve humanity as a whole... however the opposite end of the spectrum could be true in that the kids could devlope sexual relation problems or could be completely alienated from their own gender... We simply don't have enough data! So instead of leaping into the abyss as we so often do, we should do some long term studies and plan this out to see the effects. I believe if there is more postives then negatives or no negatives at all then go for it... but don't expect me to agree with somthing that we don't understand yet.
 

confernal

New member
Feb 5, 2009
207
0
0
Yes we allow parents not of the norm to raise kids... but in a safe envioremnt. A parent who abuses their kid emotionally or physically usally have their childern taken away to a safer enviorment. No homosexuals will probably not abuse their kids physicallly or emotionally(however like us their could be exceptions) but we must protect the childern from harm even if the harm is completely unintentional and with the intentions of care. A childerns relationship with their parents dramtically influnces their life, and while most of us will be exposed to stimlus like death or other negative influnces not everybody will be exposed to having homosexual parents... While no body is sure yet if there are any effects of such an upbringing all percations must be made for the childern to develope as normal as possible. You wouldn't expose an child to a murder or other negative event since most childern don't... so why POSSIBLY expose them to an negative event that most childern will not have to go through.
 

IankBailey

New member
Jun 23, 2008
98
0
0
Bunnymarn said:
If two men or two women want to get married then let them.\

IankBailey said:
Kandon Arc said:
Darkdawn said:
nyctoftero said:
Okay, so let me get this straight.
You think that everything popped straight outta God's ass.
Okay then.
What seems more likely? Everything popped into existence which is physically impossible, or that chemical reactions between elements and molecules became so complex that they created life from the right conditions?
If you can prove to me that "God" exists without that Encyclopedia Dramatica clone called the Bible, or anything that doesn't make logical sense, I might actually consider you smarter than a tree stump.
Don't want to piss you off but can you prove without a shadow of a doubt he doesn't?
I'm the tallest man in the world and shoot lasers from my face and crap gold. Prove I'm not.
I'm sorry, but you wouldn't by any chance be 12?
All I'm saying is if people use the defense "can you prove he doesn't" it's roughly the same defense as saying "insert impossibility, prove me wrong."
 

Guitarmasterx7

Day Pig
Mar 16, 2009
3,872
0
0
I find the notion of two guys doing the nasty both disgusting and unappealing, but that doesn't mean they shouldn't be able to do it. No matter how prejudice you are you have to admit that banning gay marriage is discriminative, which has no place in federal law. They should at least be able to get married legally and get all the same benefits, if not religiously. Though why homosexuals would seek to be matromonied by something so bigotive that it condemns their very existence puzzles me.
 

Spider Expert

New member
Mar 6, 2009
184
0
0
Marriage is an outdated religious custom that shouldn't be given the dignity of requesting whether it's okay for someone to love each other.
 

Bunnymarn

New member
Oct 8, 2008
243
0
0
IankBailey said:
Bunnymarn said:
If two men or two women want to get married then let them.\

IankBailey said:
Kandon Arc said:
Darkdawn said:
nyctoftero said:
Okay, so let me get this straight.
You think that everything popped straight outta God's ass.
Okay then.
What seems more likely? Everything popped into existence which is physically impossible, or that chemical reactions between elements and molecules became so complex that they created life from the right conditions?
If you can prove to me that "God" exists without that Encyclopedia Dramatica clone called the Bible, or anything that doesn't make logical sense, I might actually consider you smarter than a tree stump.
Don't want to piss you off but can you prove without a shadow of a doubt he doesn't?
I'm the tallest man in the world and shoot lasers from my face and crap gold. Prove I'm not.
I'm sorry, but you wouldn't by any chance be 12?
All I'm saying is if people use the defense "can you prove he doesn't" it's roughly the same defense as saying "insert impossibility, prove me wrong."
I realise that, it's just your 'example' wasn't a very good one. You can't prove that he does exist and you can't prove he doesn't. An argument with no real solution.
 

IankBailey

New member
Jun 23, 2008
98
0
0
Bunnymarn said:
IankBailey said:
Bunnymarn said:
If two men or two women want to get married then let them.\

IankBailey said:
Kandon Arc said:
Darkdawn said:
nyctoftero said:
Okay, so let me get this straight.
You think that everything popped straight outta God's ass.
Okay then.
What seems more likely? Everything popped into existence which is physically impossible, or that chemical reactions between elements and molecules became so complex that they created life from the right conditions?
If you can prove to me that "God" exists without that Encyclopedia Dramatica clone called the Bible, or anything that doesn't make logical sense, I might actually consider you smarter than a tree stump.
Don't want to piss you off but can you prove without a shadow of a doubt he doesn't?
I'm the tallest man in the world and shoot lasers from my face and crap gold. Prove I'm not.
I'm sorry, but you wouldn't by any chance be 12?
All I'm saying is if people use the defense "can you prove he doesn't" it's roughly the same defense as saying "insert impossibility, prove me wrong."
I realise that, it's just your 'example' wasn't a very good one. You can't prove that he does exist and you can't prove he doesn't. An argument with no real solution.
I can prove he doesn't exist. It's quite simple actually. First I ask myself if I believe in the greek gods and people who descended from Zeus and Hera, Etc. like Hercules. When I realize that I don't because I can think for myself and not follow ideas from people 100s/1000s of years ago.
 

Sane Man

New member
Feb 24, 2009
157
0
0
It's simple, in America, let the States decide. It's the State's imperative anyways to want marriage a state institution (which I disagree with being a Christian myself) but they most certainly want babies to be future taxpayers so they got involved. Obviously, homosexuals cannot produce future taxpayers.

The whole point of the US was to have State power be more important than Federal power. If Massachusetts wants to have gay marriage, move there if you want it, move somewhere else if you don't.
 

Jim-a-Lim

New member
Jan 10, 2009
176
0
0
The only reason i voted no was because marriage is a christian ceremony whereby a man and a woman specifically are meant to be joined by god, but i have no problems with civil ceremonies i guess. Also i am a christian and i have plenty of gay friends, heck my gf's housemate is gay and we hang out alot these days, so please don't think of me as a gay hater :)
 

Jim-a-Lim

New member
Jan 10, 2009
176
0
0
I don't know about them I can't speak for someone else but if it's ok for those ceremonies surely no one could object to that as it's within their principles ^^