avykins said:
I am strongly against gay marriage. Like it or not. Marriage is a religious ceremony. Always has been, always will be. You want a separation of church and state? Fine. Then you get civil unions. That is the religiously separated version. Stop whining and having all these protests over something you do not deserve.
Marriage is a religious ceremony between a man and a woman. End of story.
Now, do I think civil unions should have all the legal rights and responsibilities of a real marriage? Sure. But they do not deserve the title of marriage. Nor should the church have to recognise them as such and any professional should be able to refuse them non critical service if it goes against their beliefs such as the case of the doctor who refused to perform artificial insemination on a lesbian couple. They offered them the name of doctors who would but just did not want to do it themselves and almost lost their licence over that bullshit.
To quote this one pic I came across. "Equal Rights: Gays have the right to marry anyone of the opposite sex that they choose. Just like everyone else."
Actually no my good sir. Religion has not
always been a religous ceremony. Marriage as you know it didn't become a religious ceremony in Christian churches until the mid 1500's during the spanish inquisition and the reasoning for such was so the church could have more control over people in Europe.
Not only that but marriage is something that has been with us since the very first civilization was formed in mesepotamia it is not an invention of any church or religion. Also before and during the early years of the Roman Catholic Church marriage in many places in Europe had nothing to do with the religion. It was simply a union between two people. It involved a private ceremony between the two people, sometimes with others sometimes just themselves, and had no involvement from the Roman Catholic Church whatsoever.
Furthermore no one is saying that your church has to recognise or marry gays. Some churchs DO in fact support gay marriages and are more then happy to have ceremonies for them. It should be their right to host these ceremonies of marriage.
Your argueing over the semantics of the word marriage. You don't own the word marriage. Your church doesn't own the word marriage. Your religion doesn't own the word marriage. The debate here is that you want to impose YOUR beliefs (ie that marriage between same-sex couples is a sin) on others. I'm not saying you have to like it, accept it, be happy about it, or approve of it. Your free to have your beliefs and do as you wish and by the same token gays and churches that offer to marry gays should have that same right. Anything less is discrimination.
Edit: Just to clarify gays are asking for the right to LEGALLY MARRY that means in a courthouse in front of a judge. NO ONE or at least no one serious about the issue is trying to make it so all churchs HAVE to marry gays. We're talking about the right to go to your local courthouse and marry. Although there are plenty of Churches out there that do in fact marry or want to be able to marry gays.
Edit 2: God I think I've repeated the same history regarding Catheiscm like 50 million times throughout this thread today. Funny how people who are staunchly religious don't even know the history of their own religion. (Not directed at the guy I quoted here, just saying whats on my mind)