I find him to be
fairly accurate. usally. I would have rated Borderlands higher IMO.
in his own words, he rips apart most games to make the truly GOOD games shine all the more.
essentially, he has high-standards, and makes it perfectly clear. is he a reviewer? no. an entertainer? ALmost. I think the best why to describe him is "comedic critic". perhaps the best to approach it is "ZP: I find out the bad. OTHER REVIEW I find the good."
Ive seen tons of reviews totally gloss over the bad and I think we need ZP to point out the truth. and its FUNNY!
xavierxenon said:
He takes every small detail that he finds bad and exagerates the fuck out of it all for comedic value which doesn't work anymore. The older ones used to be funny but then it was just the same stuff over again.
If he hates every game so much he might aswell not play any at all.
one: psychonauts.\silent hill 2\fantasy world dizzy\saints row 2\several "good but not great" games hes done.
two: "BUT YAHTZEE, you say, DID YOU NOT VOW TO PLAY ANY GAME IN CASE IT MIGHT SURPRISE YOU? in which case, yes I did say that so on to the show."
in which case, there you go.